四合木植物群落对不同放牧强度的响应

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2024.04.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以四合木植物群落为研究对象,通过设置不同放牧强度:轻度放牧(LG)、中度放牧(MG)、重度放牧(HG)的控制试验,以及与无放牧(NG)对照,对四合木群落植物种类组成、物种多样性、生物量及种群更新情况进行研究。结果表明:1)随着放牧强度的增加,群落优势种四合木的重要值呈上升趋势,HG降低了草本群落中无芒隐子草、画眉草的重要值,提高了蒙古韭、骆驼蓬的重要值;2)与NG区相比,放牧处理降低了草本群落的高度、盖度、密度以及地上生物量,放牧处理下灌丛群落的高度、密度及地上生物量变化不显著,盖度呈先增后减的趋势;3)与NG区相比,放牧处理显著提高了草本群落的多样性指数、丰富度指数和优势度指数,显著降低了灌木群落的多样性指数;4)地上生物量与多样性指数、丰富度指数在各区呈线性增加的关系,与均匀度指数在NG、LG、MG区表现为正相关,在HG区表现为不相关,与优势度指数呈负相关;5)四合木种群实生苗密度在MG、HG区高于NG区。综上所述,四合木植物群落结构和功能受放牧行为的影响,其中草本群落对放牧行为的响应相较灌丛群落更为明显,因此适度放牧有利于控制草本群落,保护四合木种群。

关键词: 四合木, 放牧强度, 群落特征, 物种多样性, 生物量

Abstract:

This study focused on the Tetraena mongolica plant community,examining the effects of different grazing intensities light grazing(LG),moderate grazing(MG),heavy grazing(HG)and no grazing(NG)as the control,onplant species composition,species diversity,biomass,and population regeneration.1)As grazing intensity increased,the importance value of dominant species Tetraena mongolica in the community showed an upward trend.HG reduced the importance values of Cleistogenes songorica and Eragrostis pilosa in the herbaceous community,while increasing the importance values of Allium mongolicum and Peganum harmala.2)Compared to NG,grazing reduced the height,coverage,density and aboveground biomass of herbaceous communities.No significant changes in the height,density and aboveground biomass of shrub communities under grazing treatment,although the coverage showed a trend of initially increasing and then decreasing.3)Compared to the NG area,grazing significantly increased the Shannon-Wiener,Margalef and Simpson indices of the herbaceous community,while significantly reduced the Shannon-Wiener index of the shrub community.4)Aboveground biomass was positively correlated with the Shannon-Wiener and the Margalef indices in all areas.It was positively correlated with the Pielou index in NG,LG,and MG areas,but shows no correlation in the HG area.It was negatively correlated with the Simpson index.5)The density of seedlings of the Tetraena mongolica population was higher in the MG and HG areas compared to the NG area.In summary,the structure and function of Tetraena mongolica plant communities are affected by grazing behavior,with the herbaceous community showing a more significant response than the shrub community.Therefore,MG is beneficial for controlling the herbaceous community and protecting Tetraena mongolica populations.

Key words: Tetraena mongolica, grazing intensity, community characteristics, species diversity, biomass

中图分类号:

Q948

姬玉飞, 杨永志, 庞立东, 贾芳彬, 鲁雪妍, 高润红. 四合木植物群落对不同放牧强度的响应[J]. 林草资源研究, 2024,(4): 84-93.

JI Yufei, YANG Yongzhi, PANG Lidong, JIA Fangbin, LU Xueyan, GAO Runhong. Response of Tetraena mongolica Plant Communit to Varying Grazing Intensities[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024,(4): 84-93.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 35

[1]	KEMP R D, HAN Guodong, HOU Xiangyang, et al. Innovative grassland management systems for environmental and livelihood benefits[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110(21):8369-8374. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208063110 pmid: 23671092
[2]	REN Haiyan, EVINER V T, GUI Weiyang, et al. Livestock grazing regulates ecosystem multifunctionality in semi-arid grassland[J]. Functional Ecology, 2018, 32(12):2790-2800.
[3]	SASAKI T, OKAYASU T, SHIRATO Y, et al. Can edaphic factors demonstrate landscape-scale differences in vegetation responses to grazing?[J]. Plant Ecology, 2008, 194(1):51-66.
[4]	MCNAUGHTON S J. Grazing as an optimization process:Grass-ungulate relationships in the Serengeti[J]. The American Naturalist, 1979, 113(5):691-703.
[5]	高苏日固嘎, 斯琴朝克图, 乌兰图雅, 等. 克氏针茅草原群落物种多样性与生物量关系对放牧强度的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(23):9736-9746.
[6]	TAMARA F, PETR H, MARIO H, et al. Seasonality constraints to livestock grazing intensity[J]. Global Change Biology, 2017, 23(4):1636-1647. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13591 pmid: 27976453
[7]	WAN Hongwei, BAI Yongfei, HOOPER D U, et al. Selective grazing and seasonal precipitation play key roles in shaping plant community structure of semi-arid grasslands[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2015, 30(9):1767-1782.
[8]	MANIER J D, HOBBS N T. Large herbivores influence the composition and diversity of shrub-steppe communities in the Rocky Mountains,USA[J]. Oecologia, 2006, 146(4):641-651.
[9]	古琛, 杜宇凡, 乌力吉, 等. 载畜率对荒漠草原群落及植物功能群生物量的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2015, 24(12):1962-1968. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2015.12.006
[10]	王占文. 荒漠草原不同载畜率下主要灌木种群对近邻草本植物的影响[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2021.
[11]	杜忠毓, 贺一鸣, 房朋朋, 等. 孑遗濒危植物四合木群落组成、物种多样性及土壤养分含量[J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(11):3537-3548.
[12]	国家林业和草原局, 农业农村部. 国家重点保护野生植物名录[EB/OL].(2021-09-07)[2024-04-10]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-09/09/content_5636409.htm.
[13]	王彦荣, 曾彦军, 付华, 等. 过牧及封育对红砂荒漠植被演替的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2002, 22(4):321-327.
[14]	石松利, 王迎春, 周红兵, 等. 濒危种四合木与其近缘种霸王水分关系参数和光合特性的比较[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(4):159-169.
[15]	王乐, 赵利清, 陈育, 等. 西鄂尔多斯草原化荒漠植物群落多样性[J]. 干旱区研究, 2015, 32(2):258-265.
[16]	智颖飙, 杨持, 王中生, 等. 孑遗植物四合木(Tetraena mongolica)的濒危肇因与机制[J]. 生态学报, 2008(2):767-776.
[17]	石松利, 王迎春, 李骁, 等. 不同生育期四合木抗氧化系统的变化及生境间差异[J]. 中国沙漠, 2012, 32(3):771-779.
[18]	李鑫, 何红艳, 杨帆, 等. 基于GIS的西鄂尔多斯国家级自然保护区信息管理系统建设研究[J]. 内蒙古林业调查设计, 2011, 34(3):59-61.
[19]	张颖娟, 杨持. 濒危物种四合木与其近缘种霸王遗传多样性的比较研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(4):425-429.
[20]	维娜. 四合木(Tetraena mongolica Maxim.)和霸王(Zygophyllum xanthoxylum(Bunge)Maxim.)营养器官比较解剖[J]. 内蒙古大学学报:自然科学版, 1991, 22(4):528-533.
[21]	王震. 不同留茬高度对四合木生长及生理生化特性的影响研究[D]. 中国林业科学研究院, 2013.
[22]	王霞. 不同留茬高度对四合木生长及生理生化特性的影响研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2013.
[23]	张磊, 李锦荣, 高永, 等. 西鄂尔多斯荒漠主要灌丛特征对放牧干扰环境的响应[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2023, 38(3):1-9.
[24]	杨婧, 褚鹏飞, 陈迪马, 等. 放牧对内蒙古典型草原α、β和γ多样性的影响机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(2):188-200. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00017
[25]	赵生龙, 左小安, 张铜会, 等. 乌拉特荒漠草原群落物种多样性和生物量关系对放牧强度的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(1):168-177.
[26]	罗亚勇, 赵学勇, 左小安, 等. 放牧与封育对沙质草地植被特征及其空间变异性的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2008, 25(1):118-124.
[27]	MILCHUNAS D G, SALA O E, LAUENROTH W K. A generalized model of the effects of grazing by large herbivores on grassland community structure[J]. The American Naturalist, 1988, 132(5):87-106.
[28]	杨利民, 韩梅, 周广胜, 等. 草地群落物种多样性维持机制的研究Ⅲ.物种分布格局[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2002, 24(1):58-61.
[29]	HECTOR A, SCHMID B, BEIERKUHNLEIN C, et al. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands[J]. Science, 1999, 286(5442):1123-1127. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5442.1123 pmid: 10550043
[30]	WINCK R B, RIGOTTI M V, DE SÁE L S. Effects of different grazing intensities on the composition and diversity of Collembola communities in southern Brazilian grassland[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2019(144):98-106.
[31]	XIONG Dingpeng, SHI Peili, ZHANG Xianzhou, et al. Effects of grazing exclusion on carbon sequestration and plant diversity ingrasslands of China—A-meta-analysis[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016(94):647-655.
[32]	马文静, 张庆, 牛建明, 等. 物种多样性和功能群多样性与生态系统生产力的关系:以内蒙古短花针茅草原为例[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(7):620-630. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00064
[33]	WU Xing, LI Zongshan, FU Bojie, et al. Effects of grazing exclusion on soil carbon and nitrogen storage in semi-arid grassland in Inner Mongolia,China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 24(4):479-487.
[34]	杨畅, 朱文琰, 许明圆, 等. 不同放牧强度对高寒草甸植物实生苗更新的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2022, 39(9):1869-1879.
[35]	LEMBRECHTS J J, PAUCHARD A, LENOIR J, et al. Disturbance is the key to plant invasions in cold environments[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113(49):14061-14066. pmid: 27872292