冀北山地不同树种根际土壤化学性质特征

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2022.05.019

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了了解冀北山地不同树种根际土壤养分的差异,对该地区6个树种[华北落叶松(Larix principis-rupprechtii)、白桦(Betula platyphylla)、胡桃楸(Juglans Mandshurica)、白榆(Ulmus pumila)、花楸(Sorbus pohuashanensis)、樟子松(Pinus sylvestris)]根际土壤的化学性质进行分析。结果表明:1) 6个树种根际土壤全量养分中,土壤总有机碳的含量范围为33.90~107.65 mg/g,土壤总氮的含量范围为2.40~8.65 mg/g,土壤总磷的含量范围为490.52~829.60 mg/kg,其中全磷含量最高的为胡桃楸,全氮和全碳含量最高的均为白桦。2)土壤氨态氮含量最高的为樟子松,显著高于其它树种;土壤有效磷含量最高的为胡桃楸;土壤硝态氮、速效氮和速效钾含量最高的为白榆。3)根际土壤C/N,C/P,N/P的范围分别为11.64~12.62,69.34~128.10,4.89~10.29;C/N比值最高的为樟子松,C/P和N/P比值最高的均为白桦。4)相关性分析表明,土壤pH、土壤含水率与土壤各养分之间存在着显著或极显著的正相关关系;各速效养分与全量养分之间也存在着显著或极显著的正相关关系。

关键词: 冀北山地, 根际土壤, 树种, 化学性质

Abstract:

In order to understand the differences of rhizosphere soil nutrients among different tree species in mountain areas of northern Hebei,the chemical properties of rhizosphere soil of six tree species(Larix principisrupprechtii,Betula platyphylla,Juglans mandshurica,Ulmus pumila,Sorbus pohuashanensis and Pinus sylvestris)in the region were analyzed.The results showed that:1)among the total nutrients in rhizosphere soil of the six tree species,the content of total organic carbon in soil ranged from 33.90 to 107.65 mg/g,the content of total nitrogen in soil ranged from 2.40 to 8.65 mg/g,and the content of total phosphorus in soil ranged from 627.35 to 829.60mg/kg.Among them,Juglans mandshurica had the highest content of total phosphorus,and Betula platyphylla had the highest content of total nitrogen and total carbon.2)The highest content of ammonia nitrogen in soil was Pinus sylvestris,which was significantly higher than that of other tree species;Juglans mandshurica had the highest content of available phosphorus in soil;Ulmus pumila had the highest content of nitrate nitrogen,available nitrogen,and available potassium in soil.3)The range of C/N,C/P and N/P in rhizosphere soil were 11.64~12.62,69.34~128.10 and 4.89~10.29,respectively.Pinus sylvestris had the highest C/N ratio,and Betula platyphylla had the highest C/Pand N/P ratios.4)The correlation analysis showed that there was a significant or extremely significant positive correlation between soil pH,soil moisture content and soil nutrients;there was also a significant or extremely significant positive correlation between available nutrients and total nutrients.

Key words: mountain areas of northern Hebei, rhizosphere soil, tree species, chemical property

中图分类号:

S714.2

杨柳, 邵洪圆, 李校, 徐国巧, 马娇娇, 贾彦龙, 许中旗. 冀北山地不同树种根际土壤化学性质特征[J]. 林业资源管理, 2022, 0(5): 153-159.

YANG Liu, SHAO Hongyuan, LI Xiao, XU Guoqiao, MA Jiaojiao, JIA Yanlong, XU Zhongqi. Rhizosphere Soil Chemical Properties of Different Tree Species in Mountain Areas of Northern Hebei[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(5): 153-159.

图/表 4

表1

表2

6个树种根际土壤速效养分特征

树种	AN	AP	AK	$NH 4 +$ -N	$NO 3 -$ -N
白桦Betula platyphylla	65.15±1.36ab	14.20±2.37cd	331.62±18.27c	10.90±1.92bc	54.25±0.56ab
白榆Ulmus pumila	67.19±9.35a	21.83±3.5b	433.48±3.46a	9.68±2.08c	57.51±7.72a
胡桃楸Juglans Mandshurica	53.58±5.67bc	28.50±5.17a	405.01±6.58b	4.85±1.05d	48.73±4.62abc
花楸Sorbus pohuashanensis	56.37±2.17abc	10.55±2.0de	298.28±3.89d	13.29±0.83b	43.09±3.00bc
华北落叶松Larix principis-rupprechtii	46.19±9.32c	12.30±1.9cd	395.72±0.33b	9.15±0.49c	37.04±9.70c
樟子松Pinus sylvestris	21.35±0.13d	5.13±0.41e	320.71±8.7c	20.89±0.023a	0.46±0.11d

表2

表3

图1

参考文献 32

[1]	Lynch J. Root architecture and plant productivity[J]. Plant physiology, 1995, 109:7-13. pmid: 12228579
[2]	Neumann G, Römheld V. Rhizosphere chemistry in relation to plant nutrition[M]//Marschner's mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, 2012:347-368.
[3]	Hinsinger P, Bengough A G, Vetterlein D, et al. Rhizosphere:biophysics,biogeochemistry and ecological relevance[J]. Plant and soil, 2009, 321(1):117-152. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9885-9
[4]	张婷. 几种作物根际与非根际土壤养分含量差异探析——以重庆市北碚区为例[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2012.
[5]	Finzi A C, Abramoff R Z, Spiller K S, et al. Rhizosphere processes are quantitatively important components of terrestrial carbon and nutrient cycles[J]. Global change biology, 2015, 21(5):2082-2094. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12816 pmid: 25421798
[6]	高欢欢, 曾凡江, 赵秀芳, 等. 干旱沙漠区2种深根植物根际微生物数量分布及根际效应研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019, 34(8):172-183.
[7]	章家恩, 刘文高, 王伟胜. 南亚热带不同植被根际微生物数量与根际土壤养分状况[J]. 土壤与环境, 2002, 12(3):279-282.
[8]	陈永妍, 仇慈欢, 储秋燕, 等. 四种滨海植物根际微生物分布及根际效应研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2014, 53(3):562-564.
[9]	黄章翰, 李维扬, 纪小芳, 等. 不同林龄杉木人工林根际效应及养分特征[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2021, 49(11):61-67.
[10]	蒋治岩, 邹青勤, 杨柳, 等. 典型黑土区不同菌根类型树种根系分泌速率及根际效应差异[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(9):2709-2718.
[11]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005.
[12]	杨阳, 刘秉儒. 荒漠草原不同植物根际与非根际土壤养分及微生物量分布特征[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(22):7562-7570.
[13]	杨开军, 杨万勤, 贺若阳, 等. 川西亚高山3种典型森林土壤碳矿化特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2017, 23(5):851-856.
[14]	吉艳芝, 冯万忠, 陈立新, 等. 落叶松混交林根际与非根际土壤养分、微生物和酶活性特征[J]. 生态环境, 2008, 17(1):339-343.
[15]	张义凡, 陈林, 李学斌, 等. 不同荒漠草原植被根际与非根际土壤养分及碳库管理指数特征[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(8):24-34.
[16]	Santoro A E, Francis C A, De Sieyes N R, et al. Shifts in the relative abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea across physicochemical gradients in a subterranean estuary[J]. Environmental microbiology, 2008, 10(4):1068-1079. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01547.x pmid: 18266758
[17]	Herrmann M, Saunders A M, Schramm A. Archaea dominate the ammonia-oxidizing community in the rhizosphere of the freshwater macrophyte Littorella uniflora[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2008, 74(10):3279-3283. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02802-07 pmid: 18344332
[18]	王希华, 黄建军, 闫恩荣. 天童国家森林公园常见植物凋落叶分解的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(4):457-467. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2004.0063
[19]	贾淑霞. 落叶松和水曲柳人工林土壤根系和土壤微生物呼吸研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2009.
[20]	Jia Shuxia, Wang Zhengquan, Li Xingpeng, et al. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer,root branch order and temperature on respiration and tissue N concentration of fine roots in Larix gmelinii and Fraxinus mandshurica[J]. Tree Physiology, 2011, 31(7):718-726. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpr057 pmid: 21849591
[21]	Jia Shuxia, McLaughlin N B, Gu Jiacun, et al. Relationships between root respiration rate and root morphology,chemistry and anatomy in Larix gmelinii and Fraxinus mandshurica[J]. Tree Physiology, 2013, 33(6):579-589. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpt040 pmid: 23824239
[22]	安慧, 韦兰英, 刘勇, 等. 黄土丘陵区油松人工林和白桦天然林细根垂直分布及其与土壤养分的关系[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13(4):611-619.
[23]	陈海滨, 马秀丽, 陈志彪, 等. 南方稀土矿区水土保持植物根际土壤碳氮及pH特征[J]. 土壤学报, 2016, 53(5):1334-1341.
[24]	Wang Zhongcheng, He Gongxiu, Hou Zihang, et al. Soil C:N:P stoichiometry of typical coniferous(Cunninghamia lanceolata) and/or evergreen broadleaved(Phoebe bournei) plantations in south China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management. 2021, 486:118974. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.118974
[25]	Springob G, Kirchmann H. Bulk soil C to N ratio as a simple measure of net N mineralization from stabilized soil organic matter in sandy arable soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2003, 35(4):629-632. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00052-X
[26]	李树斌, 周丽丽, 陈宝英, 等. 亚热带树种转换对林地土壤碳氮磷计量比的影响[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2019, 39(6):575-583.
[27]	马天翼. 京津冀地区森林土壤碳氮磷含量和变化机制初探[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2019.
[28]	Ladanai S, Ågren G I, Olsson B A. Relationships between tree and soil properties in Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris forests in Sweden[J]. Ecosystems, 2010, 13(2):302-316. doi: 10.1007/s10021-010-9319-4
[29]	张珊. 不同林龄序列云杉人工林土壤化学计量特征及其与土壤因子的相关性研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2017.
[30]	韩晓荣, 杨林, 马秀枝, 等. 不同龄组兴安落叶松林土壤养分及其化学计量特征[J]. 林业资源管理, 2021(3):129-136.
[31]	Osaki M, Iyoda M, Tadano T. Ontogenetic changes in the contents of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase,phosphoeno/pyruvate carboxylase,and chlorophyll in individual leaves of maize[J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 1995, 41(2):285-293. doi: 10.1080/00380768.1995.10419585
[32]	吴萍, 印莉萍, 张立平. 植物营养分子生理学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001.

树种	TC/(mg/g)	TN/(mg/g)	TP/(mg/kg)
白桦Betula platyphylla	107.65±2.41a	8.65±0.37a	804.60±29.8a
白榆Ulmus pumila	87.85±2.08b	7.55±0.04b	736.95±17.11b
胡桃楸Juglans Mandshurica	80.90±5.50bc	6.85±0.45bc	829.60±4.57a
花楸Sorbus pohuashanensis	76.90±6.21cd	6.10±0.57cd	680.26±17.17c
华北落叶松Larix principis-rupprechtii	68.40±1.96d	5.65±0.20d	627.35±35.23d
樟子松Pinus sylvestris	33.90±3.27e	2.40±0.16e	490.52±12.96e

树种	C/N	C/P	N/P
白桦Betula platyphylla	12.46±0.25ab	128.10± 4.08a	10.29±0.41a
白榆Ulmus pumila	11.64±0.34b	119.34± 5.60ab	10.25±0.18a
胡桃楸Juglans Mandshurica	11.81±0.07b	97.56± 7.53c	8.26±0.59b
花楸Sorbus pohuashanensis	12.62±0.17ab	113.23±10.65abc	8.98±0.96b
华北落叶松Larix principis-rupprechtii	12.11±0.09b	109.20± 3.02bc	9.02±0.18b
樟子松Pinus sylvestris	14.23±1.94a	69.34± 8.49d	4.89±0.29c