The Main Plant Population and Community Characteristics of the Confucian Cemetery in Qufu,Shandong Province,China

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2015.03.015

Abstract

Abstract: Based on the data obtained from the survey of 40 samples,we clarified the tree diameter class distribution and types of species,analyzed the species diversity of the plant community in the Confucian Cemetery and evaluated the restoration and succession of plant community.The results are as followsFirstly,in the tree and shrub layers,the Shannon-Wiener diversity index,Simpson diversity index and Pielou evenness index of the Pistacia chinensis forest are obviously higher than those of the Platycladus orientailis forest(P<0.05),but nearly the same as those of the Quercus acutissima forest.In the herb layer,there is no obvious difference among the four indexes(Richness index,Shannon-Wiener diversity index,Simpson diversity index Pielou evenness index).Secondly,there are 7 expansive species,16 seclusive species,2 enhancing invasive species and 3 randomly invasive species.The platycladus orientalis population is obviously lacking in Grade Ⅰseedlings and Grade Ⅱ saplings.The Quercus acutissima population is extremely short of Grade Ⅱ saplings.Thirdly,the main cause of the vegetation status in the Confucian Cemetery is the grass cutting test,while the landscape fragmentation,area effect and non-environmental heterogeneity are also important reasons.

Key words: plant ecology, community succession, population characteristics, diameter structure, species diversity

CLC Number:

Q948

GAO Yuan, MENG Fanxu, ZHU Kongshan, HAO Jiachen. The Main Plant Population and Community Characteristics of the Confucian Cemetery in Qufu,Shandong Province,China[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2015, 0(3): 70-77.

References 36

[1]	Silvertown J.Plant coexistence and the niche[J].Trends in Ecology and Evolution,2004,19(11):605-611.
[2]	Zhou S R,Zhang D Y.A nearly neutral model of biodiversity[J].Ecology,2008,89(1):248-258.
[3]	牛克昌,刘怿宁,沈泽昊,等.群落构建的中性理论和生态位理论[J].生物多样性,2009,17(6):79-593.
[4]	张炜平,潘莎,贾昕,等.植物间正相互作用对种群动态和群落结构的影响:基于个体模型的研究进展[J].植物生态学报,2013,37(6):571-582.
[5]	Chazdon R L.Beyond deforestation:restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands[J].Science,2008,320(5882):1458-1460.
[6]	丁易,臧润国.海南岛霸王岭热带低地雨林植被恢复动态[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(5):577-586.
[7]	刘炳亮,苏金豹,陈建伟,等.人工廊道对具有不同扩散模式的植物多样性的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2013,41(6):157-160.
[8]	Ramalho C E,Laliberté E,Poot P,et al.Complex effects of fragmentation on remnant woodland plant communities of a rapidly urbanizing biodiversity hotspot[J].Ecology,2014,95(9):2466-2478.
[9]	冯飞,毕润成,张钦弟.旅游干扰对云丘山不同植被景观区物种多样性的影响[J].生态科学,2014,33(1):134-140.
[10]	牛莉芹,程占红,赵蒙.旅游干扰下五台山不同植被景观区物种多样性特征[J].应用与环境生物学报,2012,18(4):559-564.
[11]	周光裕,叶正丰,龚明良.山东曲阜孔林的植被与土壤[J].山东大学学报,1960,10(4):54-65.
[12]	徐宁,吴兆录,宋会兴.山东孔林三种植物群落物种多样性及动态研究[J].广西植物,2006,26(3):257-260.
[13]	方精云,沈泽昊,唐志尧,等.“中国山地植物物种多样性调查计划”及若干技术规范[J].生物多样性,2004,12(1):5-9.
[14]	方精云,王襄平,沈泽昊,等.植物群落清查的主要内容方法和技术规范[J].生物多样性,2009,17(6):533-548.
[15]	Tom L,Christina A C.Measuring diversity:the importance of species similarity[J].Ecology,2012,93(3):477-489.
[16]	万慧霖,冯宗炜.庐山常绿阔叶林物种组成及其演替趋势[J].生态学报,2008,28(3):1147-1156.
[17]	李立,陈建华,任海保,等.古田山常绿阔叶林优势树种甜槠和木荷的空间格局分析[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(3):241-252.
[18]	高远,朱孔山,郝加琛,等.山东蒙山 6 种造林树种 40 余年成林效果评价[J].植物生态学报,2013,37(8):728-738.
[19]	高远,慈海鑫,邱振鲁,等.山东蒙山植物多样性及其海拔梯度格局 [J].生态学报,2009,29(12):6377-6384.
[20]	高远,陈玉峰,董恒,等.50 年来山东塔山植被与物种多样性的变化[J].生态学报,2011,31(20):5984-5991.
[21]	高远,姚亮,邱振鲁,等.山东五莲山植物群落结构及物种多样性[J].植物研究,2008,28(3):359-363.
[22]	程瑞梅,肖文发,王晓荣,等.三峡库区植被不同演替阶段的土壤养分特征[J].林业科学,2010,46(9):1-6.
[23]	Finegan B,Delgado D.Structural and floristic heterogeneity in a 30-year-old Costa rican rain forest restored on pasture through natural secondary succession[J].Restoration Ecology,2000,8(4):380-393.
[24]	李伟立,余倩,郭雪艳,等.皖南次生马尾松林自然演替进程中的群落动态[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(8):1997-2004.
[25]	李铭红,宋瑞生,姜云飞,等.片断化常绿阔叶林的植物多样性[J].生态学报,2008,28(3):1137-1146.
[26]	武晶,刘志民.生境破碎化对生物多样性的影响研究综述[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(7):1946-1952.
[27]	Wright J S.Plant diversity in tropical forests:a review of mechanisms of species coexistence[J].Oecologia,2002,130(1):1-14.
[28]	Lundholm J T.Plant species diversity and environmental heterogeneity:spatial scale and competing hypotheses[J].Journal of Vegetation Science,2009,20(3):377-391.
[29]	刘海丰,桑卫国,薛达元.暖温带森林优势种群的地形生境变异性[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(4):795-801.
[30]	McKinney M L.Influence of settlement time,human population,park shape and age,visitation and roadson the number of alien plant species in protected areas in theUSA[J].Diversity and Distributions,2002,8(6):311-318.
[31]	Kellner J B,Hastings A.A reserve paradox:introduced heterogeneity may increase regional invasibility[J].Conservation Letters,2009,2(3):115-122.
[32]	姜俊,陆元昌,庞丽峰,.南亚热带人工林树种种间联结分析及经营模式设计[J].林业资源管理,2014,36(6):79-84.
[33]	高远,邱振鲁,陈玉峰,等.旅游干扰对蒙山植物种类组成的影响[J].世界科技研究与发展,2009,31(4):708-710.
[34]	朱珠,包维楷,庞学勇,等.旅游干扰对九寨沟冷杉林下植物种类组成及多样性的影响[J].生物多样性,2006,14(4):284-291.
[35]	管东生,林卫强,陈玉娟.旅游干扰对白云山土壤和植被的影响[J].环境科学,1999,20(6):6-9.
[36]	郑伟,朱进忠,潘存德.旅游干扰对喀纳斯景区草地植物多样性的影响[J].草地学报,2008,16(6):624-635.