欢迎访问林业资源管理

林业资源管理 ›› 2009, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 76-82.

• 科学技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

旅游城市生态评价方法比较分析与实证研究——以广西桂林为例

马艺芳1,2   

  1. 1.北京林业大学 省部共建森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室,北京 100083;
    2.广西师范大学,广西 桂林 541000
  • 收稿日期:2009-01-06 修回日期:2009-04-13 出版日期:2009-04-28 发布日期:2020-12-16
  • 作者简介:马艺芳(1962-),女,广西资源人,副教授,在读博士生,主要研究方向为城市生态评价、生态旅游。
  • 基金资助:
    广西教育厅项目(0802LX291);广西师范大学重点项目(04SKZD06)

Comparative Analysis and Empirical Study on Ecological Evaluation Method for Tourist City——Take Guilin City as an example

MA Yifang1,2   

  1. 1. The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation, Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 10083, China;
    2. Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
  • Received:2009-01-06 Revised:2009-04-13 Online:2009-04-28 Published:2020-12-16

摘要: 旅游活动的开展依赖于良好的生态环境,对旅游城市生态评价可以了解其生态系统健康、平衡、良性循环状态,明晰其生态发展变化的特点和未来趋势。对旅游城市生态综合指数评价法、旅游城市生态安全模糊综合评价法、旅游城市生态足迹评价法进行比较分析研究,认为这3种方法同时使用,可以克服单一评价方法本身的一些缺陷,能从不同角度互为补充、较完整地反映旅游城市的生态状况。利用这3种评价方法,对桂林旅游城市进行生态评价,结果为:桂林旅游城市生态状况处于“临界安全”状态。

关键词: 旅游城市, 生态评价, 方法比较, 广西桂林

Abstract: The development of tourism activity depends on a goodecological environment.Health, equilibrium and benign cycle of ecosystem can beunderstood according to the ecological evaluation for tourist city.And then the characteristic and future tendency of ecological development would be perspicuity.The simultaneous usage of ecological comprehensive index evaluating method, fuzzy comprehensive ecological security evaluating method and ecological footprint evaluating method for tourist city could overcome some defiencies forsingular evaluating method, which could complement each other from different angles and relatively completely reflect the ecological status.The ecological evaluation of Guilin City by using three methods above showed that the eco-security situation was safe relatively.

Key words: tourist city, ecological evaluation, method comparison, Guilin, Guangxi

中图分类号: