塞罕坝机械林场林内景观质量评价研究

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.03.018

林业资源管理 ›› 2016, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 98-103.doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.03.018

塞罕坝机械林场林内景观质量评价研究

杨会娟¹, 于泊², 车晓雨¹, 于士涛³, 范冬冬³, 黄选瑞⁴

1.河北农业大学园林与旅游学院,河北保定 071000;
2.河北省木兰围场国有林场管理局,河北围场 068450;
3.河北省塞罕坝机械林场,河北围场 068450;
4.河北农业大学林学院,河北保定 071000

收稿日期:2016-04-15 修回日期:2016-05-16 出版日期:2016-06-28 发布日期:2020-11-02
通讯作者: 黄选瑞,男,教授,博导,主要研究方向为森林可持续经营。Email:hxr1962@163.com
作者简介:杨会娟(1981-),女,河北井陉人,讲师,在读博士,研究方向为森林游憩。Email:yhjhebau@163.com
基金资助:
国家林业局全国森林经营基础研究项目(169201531-4);河北农业大学中青年骨干教师境外研修项目(1081006)

Study on Scenic Beauty of Forest Interior Landscape in Saihanba Mechanized Forest Farm

YANG Huijuan¹, YU Bo², CHE Xiaoyu¹, YU Shitao³, FAN Dongdong³, Huang Xuanrui⁴

1. College of Landscape and Travel,Agriculture University of Hebei,Baoding ,Hebei 071000,China;
2. Mulan State-owned Forest Management Bureau of Hebei,Weichang,Hebei 068450,China;
3. Saihanba Mechanized Forest Farm of Hebei,Weichang,Hebei 068450,China;
4. College of Forestry,Agriculture University of Hebei,Baoding,Hebei 071000,China

Received:2016-04-15 Revised:2016-05-16 Online:2016-06-28 Published:2020-11-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用SBE法,以塞罕坝机械林场落叶松纯林、落叶松白桦混交林、樟子松纯林和桦树天然次生林等4种主要林分的林内景观为研究对象进行研究。结果表明:落叶松纯林和白桦落叶松混交林美景度较高,樟子松纯林次之,桦树次生林最低;平均胸径在15 cm以下、密度在 1 250株/hm²以上、林分透视距离在1倍树高以下、乔灌草结构、灌木盖度高于90%、灌木高度在1m以上,都显著降低了林内美景度;密度、林分结构(乔灌草结构)、灌层盖度(≥90%)3个指标进入美景度与林分指标的回归模型,解释了55.1%的因变量,且均与美景度为负相关关系,说明这3个指标显著降低了林分的美景度;林分美景度与灌层的生物多样性无显著相关关系,降低灌木层的高度和盖度,既可以增加美景度也不会影响灌层生物多样性。

关键词: 塞罕坝, 林内景观, 美景度, SBE法

Abstract: The article studied forest interior landscape quality of 4 typical forest stands in Saihanba using SBE method which include Larix principis rupprechtii plantation,Larix principis rupprechtii and Betula platyphylla mixed plantation,Pinus sylvestris var.mongholica lit.plantation and Betula platyphylla natural secondary forest.The results showed that SBE score of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation,Larix principis-rupprechtii and Betula platyphylla mixed plantation were higher,followed by Pinus sylvestris var.mongholica Litv.,and Betula platyphylla natural secondary forest was the lowest;the SBE score was reduced significantly by some stand indicators including DBH below 15cm,stand density below 1250 plant/hm²,perspective distance below the tree height,vertical structure with tree,shrub and grass,shrub layer coverage greater than 90%,shrub average height greater than 1m;3 indicators including density,stand structure (with tree,shrub and grass),shrub layer coverage(more than 90%) entered the regression model,explaining 55.1% of the dependent variable,and had a negative correlation with SBE,indicating that the 3 indexes significantly reduced the scenic beauty of the stand;SBE score has no significant correlation with the biodiversity of shrub layer,so reducing height and coverage of shrub layer could increase the scenic beauty but not affect the biodiversity of shrub layer.

Key words: Saihanba, forest interior landscape, scenic beauty, SBE method

中图分类号:

S718.5

杨会娟, 于泊, 车晓雨, 于士涛, 范冬冬, 黄选瑞. 塞罕坝机械林场林内景观质量评价研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2016, 0(3): 98-103.

YANG Huijuan, YU Bo, CHE Xiaoyu, YU Shitao, FAN Dongdong, Huang Xuanrui. Study on Scenic Beauty of Forest Interior Landscape in Saihanba Mechanized Forest Farm[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2016, 0(3): 98-103.

参考文献

[1] Gobster P H.Forest aesthetics,biodiversity,and the perceived appropriateness of ecosystem management practices[R].Portland:US Department of Agriculture,Forest Service,Pacific Northwest Research Station,1996:77-97.
[2] Ode A.Visual aspects in urban woodland management and planning[D].Alnarp:Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,2003.
[3] Sheppard S R J.Beyond visual resource management:emerging theoris of an ecological aesthetic and visible stewardship [C]//Sheppard S R J,Harshaw H W.Forests and landscapes-linking ecology,sustainability and aesthetics.Wallingford,U.K.:CABI Publishing,2001:149-172.
[4] Ribe R G.The aesthetics of forestry:what has empirical preference research taught us[J].Environmental Management,1989(13):55-74.
[5] 陈鑫峰,王雁.国内外森林景观的定量评价和经营技术研究现状[J].世界林业研究,2000,13(5):31-38.
[6] Tönnes S,Karjalainen E,Löfström I,et al.Scenic impacts of retention trees in clear-cutting areas[J].Forest Research,2004(19):348-357.
[7] 吴南生.北京西山风景游憩林抚育理论与技术研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2006.
[8] 董建文.福建中、南亚热带风景游憩林构建基础研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2006.
[9] 李明阳,菅利荣.风景林调查规划与合理经营的理论和实践[M].北京:北京林业出版社,2008.
[10] 姜金璞.北京西山地区风景游憩林抚育管理技术及效果评价研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2008.
[11] 章志都.京郊低山风景游憩林质量评价及调控关键技术研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2010.
[12] Zube E H,Ervin,S H,James L T,et al.Landscape perception:reasearch,application,and theory[J].Landscape Planning,1982(9):1-33.
[13] 翟明普,张荣,阎海平.风景评价在风景林建设中应用研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2003(6):16-19.
[14] 张荣,翟明普,阎海平.国内外风景游憩林抚育研究进展[J].北京林业大学学报,2004,26(2):109-113.
[15] 俞孔坚,吉庆萍.专家与公众景观审美差异研究及对策[J].中国园林,1999(2):19-23.
[16] 许大为,李羽佳.基于SD-SBE法的专家与公众审美差异研究[J].中国园林,2014,30(7):52-56.
[17] Daniel T C,Boster R S.Measuring landscape esthetics:the scenic beauty estimation method,research paper RM-167[R].Portland:US Department of Agriculture,Forest Service,1976:45-48.
[18] Vodak M C,Roberts P L,Wellman J D,et al.Scenic impacts of eastern hardwood management[J].Forest Science,1985,31(2):289-301.
[19] 李效文.北京低山主要风景游憩林抚育技术模式研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2008.
[20] 章志都.侧柏刺槐林群落生态学特征及林内景观影响研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2007.
[21] Hull R B,Buckley G J.The Scenic beauty temporal distribution method:an attempt to make scenic beauty assessments compatible with forest planning efforts[J].Forensic Science,1986,32(2):271-286.
[22] 李翠翠.京郊典型风景游憩林林内景观质量评价技术研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2010.
[23] 史琛媛,张志伟,魏浩亮,等.冀北山地不同疏伐密度下油松风景林美景度的研究[J].河北林果研究,2015,30(4):335-339.
[24] Deng Songqiu,Yan Jiafeng,Guan Qingwei,et al.Short term effects of thining intensity on scenic beauty value of different stands[J].Forest Research,2013(18):209-219.
[25] Deng Songqiu,Yin Na,Guan Qingwei,et al.Dynamic response of the scenic beauty value of different forests to various thinning intensities in central eastern China[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2014(186):7413-7429.
[26] 陈建军.基于目标树的杉木风景游憩林经营技术研究[J].现代园艺,2014(12):6-7.
[27] 欧阳勋志,廖为明,彭士揆.天然阔叶林景观质量评价及其垂直结构优化技术[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(6):1388-1392.
[28] 章志都,徐程扬,董建文,等.郁闭度对风景游憩林林下植被及林内景观的影响[J].中国城市林业,2008,6(2):10-13.

塞罕坝机械林场林内景观质量评价研究

Study on Scenic Beauty of Forest Interior Landscape in Saihanba Mechanized Forest Farm

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	付立华, 侯金潮, 孙赫, 王鹤智, 刘强, 程顺. 基于分位数回归的华北落叶松干形曲线模拟[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020, 0(1): 151-157.
[2]	周阳超, 王瑞辉, 周璞, 符伟男, 钟呈, 周义罡. 湘东常绿阔叶林林内景观质量评价与分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019, 0(3): 163-168.
[3]	常伟强. 塞罕坝机械林场森林资源动态变化分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2018, 0(6): 13-17.
[4]	艾婧文, 刘健, 余坤勇, 张今朝, 赵秋月, 上官莎逸. 耦合美景度的生态风景林目标树法优化经营[J]. 林业资源管理, 2017, 0(6): 94-102.
[5]	赵娱, 张菲, 许中旗, 张岩, 程顺, 崔同祥. 塞罕坝地区樟子松生长过程研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2017, 0(5): 39-44.
[6]	王敏华, 傅伟聪, 陈梓茹, 朱志鹏, 黄淑萍, 蓝若珂, 董建文. 中视距下福建山地乡村背景林美学质量评价[J]. 林业资源管理, 2017, 0(3): 86-90.
[7]	周璞, 王瑞辉, 周阳超, 符伟男, 钟呈, 周义罡. 湘东中山区风景游憩林林内景观质量评价与分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2017, 0(3): 91-97.
[8]	许晴, 李晓莎, 许中旗, 张岩, 张菲, 程顺, 崔同祥. 塞罕坝地区樟子松立木材积表研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2017, 0(1): 57-62.