Forest and Grassland Resources Research >
Evaluation and screening of fire-resistant performance of major native afforestation tree species in eastern Qinghai Province
Received date: 2026-07-19
Revised date: 2025-11-16
Online published: 2026-04-17
By evaluating the fire resistance of native afforestation tree species in eastern Qinghai Province,this study clarifies the disparities in fire resistance and the application value of different species,providing a theoretical basis and practical reference for regional forest fire prevention and forestry ecological construction.This study focus on 14major native afforestation tree species in eastern region of Qinghai Province.The physicochemical properties and combustibility traits(moisture content,ignition point,calorific value,ash content,crude fat)of their different organs(leaves and branches)were determined.Utilizing the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP),a comprehensive fire resistance evaluation index model was established based on three dimensions:physicochemical combustion properties,bio-ecological characteristics,and afforestation economic traits.The comprehensive ranking of fire resistance performance of the 14 tree species was obtained in descending order as follow:Ulmus pumila,Caragana korshinskii,Tamarix chinensis,Populus tomentosa Carrière,Populus davidiana,Salix oritrepha,Cotoneaster multiflorus,Picea crassifolia,Betula albosinensis,Sorbus pohuashanensis,Pinus tabuliformis,Potentilla glabra,Sabina przewalskii,Hippophae rhamnoides.The results showed that among the tree species in eastern Qinghai Province,Ulmus pumila is a native afforestation tree species with strong fire-resistant,wide adaptability,and economic applicability,followed by Caragana korshinskii,Tamarix chinensis,Populus tomentosa,Populus davidiana,etc.Pinus tabuliformis,Potentilla glabra,Sabina przewalskii,and Hippophae rhamnoides are not suitable for ultivation as pure stands for fire prevention.The study screened out native fire-resistant tree species suitable for the local area,providing theoretical support for considerations related to forest fire prevention in regional afforestation.
WANG Qiaoyu , ZHANG Hongwei , HU Shurong , WANG Lina . Evaluation and screening of fire-resistant performance of major native afforestation tree species in eastern Qinghai Province[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2025 , 0(6) : 72 -82 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2025.06.007
| [1] | 陈昊权, 王洪荣, 张文, 等. 四川省不同乔木植被类型可燃物载量模型构建[J]. 林草资源研究, 2024(6):117-128. |
| [2] | 伊伯乐. 呼伦贝尔地区森林草原火灾时空动态与燃烧特征研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2024. |
| [3] | NOLAN R H, BOER M M, COLLINS L, et al. Causes and consequences of eastern Australia’s 2019—20 season of mega-fires[J]. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26(3):1039-1041. |
| [4] | TEIXEIRA A M C, CURRAN T J, JAMESON P E, et al. Post—Fire Resprouting in New Zealand Woody Vegetation:Implications for Restoration[J]. Forests, 2020, 11(3):269. |
| [5] | MURRAY B R, BROWN C, MURRAY M L, et al. An integrated approach to identify low-flammability plant species for green firebreaks[J]. Fire, 2020, 3(2):9. |
| [6] | HIGUERA P E, ABATZOGLOU J T. Record-setting climate enabled the extraordinary 2020 fire season in the western United States[J]. Glob Change Biol, 2020, 27(1):1-2. |
| [7] | 李存秀, 刘峰贵, 孙南沙, 等. 明清时期甘青地区饥荒及其社会影响与响应[J]. 第四纪研究, 2025, 45(1):335-348. |
| [8] | 黎书会, 吴艳, 孙志东, 等. 凉山州15种主要经济树种的防火性能[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1):203-211. |
| [9] | 史腊梅, 姚启超, Peter Brown. 青藏高原东缘“魔鬼火灾季”的驱动因子[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2026, 3(30):1-9. |
| [10] | 杨伟, 何琬琬, 熊子宣, 等. 武汉市森林常见树种凋落叶易燃性研究[J]. 林草资源研究, 2025(1):77-83. |
| [11] | 李世友, 袁俊杰, 杨林, 等. 西南林区森林防火分区技术探讨[J]. 森林防火, 2017(1):27-30. |
| [12] | 曹华龙. 东北地区森林防火管理面临的问题及对策研究[J]. 农业灾害研究, 2023, 13(5):194-196. |
| [13] | 何振邦, 龙玉莲, 金桂梅, 等. 防逃逸活捕笼和灭鼠烟包对高原鼢鼠的防效研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2025(4):72-74. |
| [14] | 彭红明, 刘长礼, 袁有靖, 等. 高寒峡谷城市地下空间资源评价及利用方略[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2024, 20(6):1778-1789+1797. |
| [15] | 王虹, 秦维. 105℃恒重法与两次烘干法对于玉米水分测定的定量研究[J]. 粮食加工, 2008(2):82-83. |
| [16] | 国家林业局. 森林可燃物的测定:LY/T2013—2012[S]. 北京: 国家林业局, 2012. |
| [17] | 高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社,2006:149-151. |
| [18] | 谭家得, 柯欢, 陈杰, 等. 华南地区3个树种的抗火性能分析[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2016, 32(6):86-90. |
| [19] | 徐六一, 罗宁, 刘桂华, 等. 安徽省防火树种的选择及评价研究[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2005, 32(3):349-353. |
| [20] | 田晓瑞, 舒立福, 乔启宇, 等. 南方林区防火树种的筛选研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2001, 23(5):43-47. |
| [21] | 陈存及, 何宗明, 陈东华, 等. 37种针阔树种抗火性能及其综合评价的研究[J]. 林业科学, 1995, 31(2):135-143. |
| [22] | POPOVI? Z, BOJOVI? S, MARKOVI? M, et al. Tree species flammability based on plant traits:A synthesis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 800:149625. |
| [23] | 钟金, 朱宇颐, 秦超, 等. 四川省70种常见树种枝叶燃烧性评价[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2024, 52(19):103-109+117. |
| [24] | 张宝学, 周学海. 浅谈防火树种选择的依据与意义[J]. 绿色科技, 2013(1):71-72. |
| [25] | 彭徐剑, 何晨, 詹庆斌. 3种南方防火树种理化性质的试验研究[J]. 林产工业, 2021, 58(3):27-31. |
| [26] | 王昆伦, 侯小菲, 蒋婷, 等. 昆明地区 12 种园林绿化树种鲜叶燃烧性比较[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019(6):97-100. |
| [27] | 王璧蕾. 四川省十种松属树种的燃烧性评估及其影响因子研究[D]. 成都: 四川农业大学, 2024. |
| [28] | 祝必琴, 黄淑娥, 田俊, 等. 亚热带季风区不同林型可燃物理化性质及燃烧性研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2011, 33(6):1149-1154. |
| [29] | DICKINSON K, KIRKPATRICK J. The flammability and energy content of some important plant species and fuel components in the forests of Southeastern Tasmania[J]. Journal of Biogeography, 1985, 12(2):121-134. |
| [30] | 肖云武, 杨建军, 宋娜娜. 东天山北坡荒漠区15种植物热值特征研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2023(1):42-50. |
| [31] | 张今奇, 周梅, 赵鹏武, 等. 内蒙古大兴安岭东麓5种典型树种燃烧性[J]. 温带林业研究, 2021, 4(1):27-33. |
| [32] | 闫凯达, 赵凤君, 司莉青, 等. 林火阻隔带和阻隔体系研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(1):197-208. |
| [33] | 岳亮, 郑淑霞, 王彬, 等. 大通老爷山火烧迹地人工林恢复潜力调查[J]. 青海农林科技, 2022(4):45-50. |
| [34] | 张轶超, 周梅, 舒洋, 等. 内蒙古典型荒漠草原主要树种燃烧性研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2023, 42(1):120-124. |
| [35] | 李海佳, 郑淑霞, 单笑笑, 等. 西宁周边山地主要造林树种防火性能评价[J]. 林业科学研究, 2021, 34(5):111-118. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
