Forest and Grassland Resources Research >
Construction of Fuel Load Models for Different Tree Vegetation Types in Sichuan Province
Received date: 2024-10-21
Revised date: 2024-12-08
Online published: 2025-04-18
The study of fuel load models provides a theoretical foundation for the scientific assessment and prevention of forest fire risks in Sichuan Province,while also contributing to sustainable forest management and fire prevention strategies.Using data from 6 848 standard arbor sample plots collected during the Sichuan Province Forest Fire Risk Survey,arbor forests were categorized into five forest types based on vegetation zones and types.The fuel load characteristics of different vegetation types were analyzed,and a Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to identify the key factors influencing fuel load.Utilizing various curve-fitting techniques,optimal relationships between these pivotal factors and fuel load were established,which were subsequently combined to construct a regression model based on composite variables.This composite variable model was compared to a multiple stepwise regression model to identify the most effective fuel load estimation model.1)Significant differences were observed in the fuel load characteristics among vegetation types.The arbor layer accounted for the largest proportion of the fuel load,while the litter layer contributed the least.2)Key factors influencing fuel load varied across vegetation types.Average tree height,average diameter at breast height,and age group emerged as major influencing factors across multiple vegetation types,whereas altitude,canopy density,and stand density had significant impacts in specific vegetation types.3)Both the composite variable regression model and the multiple stepwise regression model exhibited strong predictive performance.However,the optimal model depended on the forest type.The composite model performed best for cold coniferous forests,while the multiple stepwise regression model achieved higher predictive accuracy for cold broadleaf forests,subtropical coniferous forests,subtropical broadleaf forests,and subtropical mixed forests.The models developed in this study are methodologically robust and generate reliable predictions.These models are recommended for estimating the fuel loads of various vegetation types in Sichuan Province,providing critical support for future fire risk assessments and prevention strategies.
Key words: vegetation types; forest fuel load; stand factors; site factors; fuel models
Haoquan CHEN , Hongrong WANG , Wen ZHANG , Chen DONG , Zhiqiang MIN . Construction of Fuel Load Models for Different Tree Vegetation Types in Sichuan Province[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024 , 0(6) : 117 -128 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2024.06.014
| [1] | 龚亚东, 黎志彬, 汪炼峰, 等. 黄梅县森林防火阻隔带营建现状及对策[J]. 湖北林业科技, 2024, 53(2):79-82. |
| [2] | 黄跃飞, 黄庆军. 基于林业生态安全的森林防火管理措施探究[J]. 农村科学实验, 2024,(11):154-156. |
| [3] | 鲁雅楠, 黄海霞, 马立鹏, 等. 云杉和冷杉林可燃物载量特征及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2024,1-11.(2024-04-29)[2024-10-10].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1055.S.20240428.1458.056.html. |
| [4] | 李旭, 张延威, 张运林, 等. 云南顶瓶梗霉对森林地表凋落物的降解效果[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2024, 44(6):120-127. |
| [5] | 宁吉彬, 瓮岳太, 邸雪颖, 等. 大兴安岭沟塘草甸地表可燃物载量快速测定方法[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2018, 46(5):44-48. |
| [6] | 魏云敏, 鞠琳. 森林可燃物载量研究综述[J]. 森林防火, 2006(4):18-21. |
| [7] | 盛锋雷, 刁军, 王柏昌, 等. 上海市不同林分型乔木层可燃物载量模型研究[J]. 广西林业科学, 2023, 52(3):384-393. |
| [8] | 王忆文, 索奥丽, 高钰, 等. 四川西昌云南松林地表可燃物载量及影响因素研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2023, 45(10):100-108. |
| [9] | 肖君. 福建马尾松林可燃物载量估算模型构建[J]. 福建林业科技, 2023, 50(4):89-94. |
| [10] | 杨雪清, 孙志超, 柴. 全国森林可燃物载量样地调查与预估方法探讨[J]. 林业资源管理, 2022(6):1-6. |
| [11] | 董奎, 谭本会, 余斌. 联合Sentinel-1和Sentinel-2数据的森林可燃物载量反演研究[J]. 贵州工程应用技术学院学报, 2023, 41(3):58-66. |
| [12] | NGUYEN T H, JONES S, REINKE K J, et al. Estimating fine fuel loads in Eucalypt forests using forest inventory data and amodelling approach[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2024,561:121-851. |
| [13] | SYDORENKO S, GUMENIUK V, De Miguel-Díez F, et al. Assessment of the surface forest fuel load in the ukrainian polissia[J]. Fire Ecology, 2024, 20(1):35. |
| [14] | JI Cuicui, YANG Hengcong, LI Xiaosong, et al. Forest wildfire risk assessment of anning river valley in Sichuan Province based on driving factors with multi-source data[J]. Forests, 2024, 15(9):1523. |
| [15] | 王秋华, 王劲, 李晓娜, 等. 森林—城镇交界域火灾研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(5):1-10. |
| [16] | WANG San, LI Hongli, NIU Shukui. Empirical research on climate warming risks for forest fires:A case study of grade I forest fire danger zone,Sichuan Province,China[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(14):7773. |
| [17] | 王明婷, 贾丹丹, 梁永佳, 等. 森林火灾危险性评估分级初探:以广西防城港市防城区为例[J]. 森林防火, 2024, 42(2):53-59. |
| [18] | 曹杨, 赵晓莉, 苏德斌, 等. 成都西部山地和平原过渡区边界层水平风场区域差异分析[J]. 气象科技, 2024, 52(5):743-752. |
| [19] | 四川省林业和草原局. 四川省第一次森林和草原火灾风险普查实施细则[EB/OL].(2021-04-12)[2024-09-30].https://lcj.sc.gov.cn/scslyt/gsgg/2021/4/12/62d5b22c2cd8419385ef0b460f027b7e.shtml. |
| [20] | 董利虎. 东北林区主要树种及林分类型生物量模型研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2015. |
| [21] | 李兆国, 瓮岳太, 徐建楠, 等. 模拟地表火行为对燃烧剩余物水溶性碳氮的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(4):1500-1511. |
| [22] | COHEN J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences[M].2nd ed.Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge, 1988. |
| [23] | ZOU H, HASTIE T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society:Series B(Statistical Methodology), 2005, 67(2):301-320. |
| [24] | 王秀, 张增江, 郑艳红, 等. 大三叶升麻种子与果实的相关性分析[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2024, 27(10):24-26. |
| [25] | 王雅萍, 徐喜飞, 李家国, 等. 中低分辨率卫星蓝藻水华监测面积校正研究:以GOCI-2为例[J]. 航天返回与遥感, 2024, 45(5):123-133. |
| [26] | 田野, 牛树奎, 陈锋, 等. 火干扰后的油松林地表死可燃物负荷及影响因子[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 47(6):691-697. |
| [27] | 胡庆, 刘福珍, 段信先. 乔木林可燃物载量空间分布研究:以吉安市为例[J]. 生物灾害科学, 2023, 46(4):529-537. |
| [28] | 张状, 宗树琴, 闫星蓉, 等. 林分和地形因子对崇礼冬奥核心区森林地表可燃物载量的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(10):59-66. |
| [29] | 刘欣蓓. 基于高光谱的淮南地区典型农作物叶片叶绿素含量反演研究[D]. 安徽: 安徽理工大学, 2024. |
| [30] | 秦乃花, 陈瑞, 吕常笑, 等. 山东省不同林分地表可燃物载量及其燃烧性研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2023, 38(5):176-183. |
| [31] | 陈智卿, 陈柏华, 吕树德. 塞罕坝机械林场针叶林不同林分类型可燃物载量差异探讨[J]. 河北林果研究, 2014, 29(2):138-140. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |