Forest and Grassland Resources Research >
Evaluation of the Implementation Effectiveness of the Three-North Shelterbelt Forest Program from 2001 to 2020
Received date: 2024-04-24
Revised date: 2024-06-11
Online published: 2024-12-24
The implementation of the Three-North(i.e.,Northeast China,North China and Northwest China)Shelterbelt Forest Program from 2001 to 2020 has yielded significant results,and the dynamic evaluation of the implementation effect of the Three-North Shelterbelt Forest Program at this stage facilitates precise measurement of future objectives and tasks focus.By applying dynamic weighting and normal cloud models,we constructed a multi-level indicator system to comprehensively evaluate the implementation effect of the Three-North Shelterbelt Forest Program from 2001 to 2020,and selected the grey system prediction model to accurately predict the first-level effect response index from 2024 to 2028.The results show that:1)The response indexes for project objectives,benefits,and sustainability show a steady upward trend,of which the largest increase is the index of project benefits,and the smallest increase is the index of project objectives.2)The overall evaluation of the Three-North Shelterbelt Forest Program from 2001 to 2020 is positive,which indicates that the project's comprehensive benefits are significant in this period.3)The comprehensive evaluation and prediction results for the Three-North Shelterbelt Forest Program from 2024 to 2028 show a consistent upward trend in both project goal and sustainability indices.Focusing the evaluation on project objectives,benefits,and sustainability,the index system for evaluating the implementation effect of the Three-North Shelterbelt Forest Program from 2001 to 2020 has been enhanced and refined.
Haoyu DENG , Yulan SONG , Tong CHEN , Rui WANG . Evaluation of the Implementation Effectiveness of the Three-North Shelterbelt Forest Program from 2001 to 2020[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024 , 0(3) : 9 -17 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2024.03.002
| [1] | 朱教君, 郑晓. 关于三北防护林体系建设的思考与展望:基于40年建设综合评估结果[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(5):1600-1610. |
| [2] | 胡海波, 贾西川. 我国平原农区林带胁地效应及其控制措施研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(2):234-240. |
| [3] | 高建利, 张小刚. 对三北防护林体系工程灌木林发展的思考[J]. 林业资源管理, 2018(4):1-5. |
| [4] | 刘竞妍, 张可, 王桂华. 综合评价中数据标准化方法比较研究[J]. 数字技术与应用, 2018, 36(6):84-85. |
| [5] | FENG Feng, TING Zhao, NAN Jiang, et al. Path analysis of influencing factors of completeness evaluation in Sanyizhai Irrigation Area[J]. E3S Web of Conferences, 2021, 245(1):1-5. |
| [6] | 何孝容. 新形势下林业工程审计的目标与风险管理研究:评《我国林业工程审计制度框架构建研究》[J]. 林业经济, 2021, 43(12):102. |
| [7] | 吕金蔚, 刘冰. “双碳”目标下林业碳汇高质量发展的路径研究[J]. 林业经济问题, 2022, 42(6):666-672. |
| [8] | 张丹妮, 陈西雅, 臧传富. 三北防护林体系建设工程区宜林潜力[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(5):184-194. |
| [9] | 谢舒笛, 莫兴国, 胡实, 等. 三北防护林工程区植被绿度对温度和降水的响应[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(1):152-165. |
| [10] | 程丽芬. “一带一路”发展战略下三北防护林工程建设策略研究:以山西省为例[J]. 林业经济, 2017, 39(9):53-56. |
| [11] | 陈建成, 徐嘉琪. 通辽市“三北工程”建设现状研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2015(1):173-178. |
| [12] | SONG Lining, ZHU Jiaojun, LI Mingcai, et al. Canopy transpiration of Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica in a sparse wood grassland in the semiarid sandy region of Northeast China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018, 250:192-201. |
| [13] | WOHLGEMUTH T, SCHWITTER R, BEBI P, et al. Post-windthrow management in protection forests of the Swiss Alps[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2017, 136:1029-1040. |
| [14] | LIU Ziqiang, YU Xinxiao, JIA Guodong, et al. Water consumption by an agroecosystem with shelter forests of corn and Populus in the North China Plain[J]. Agriculture,ecosystems & environment, 2018, 265:178-189. |
| [15] | 王雨昕, 孙灏, 许鹏, 等. 综合生态与社会效益的辽西北沙化土地生态治理成效评估模型[J]. 测绘通报, 2024(1):25-31. |
| [16] | 纪平, 邵全琴, 王敏, 等. 中国三北防护林工程第二阶段生态效益综合评价[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(11):31-48. |
| [17] | ZHU Jiaojun, SONG Lining. A review of ecological mechanisms for management practices of protective forests[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2021, 32(2):435-448. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |