欢迎访问林草资源研究

Study on the Characteristics of Old Natural Forest of Castanopsis tibetana in Liangyeshan National Nature Reserve of Fujian Province

  • Yuande DENG ,
  • Zhizhong LIU ,
  • Xiuping XU
Expand
  • 1. School of Culture and Tourism,Minxi Vocational and Technical College,Longyan Fujian 364000,China
    2. School of Information and Manufacturing,Minxi Vocational and Technical College,Longyan Fujian 364000,China

Received date: 2021-10-22

  Revised date: 2021-11-04

  Online published: 2022-01-12

Abstract

The characteristics of old natural forest of Castanopsis tibetana in Liangyeshan National Nature Reserve of Fujian Province were studied by phytocoenology investigation in the method of temporary sample strip plot. The results showed that the stand was composed of 21 tree species in tree layer. The stand dominant species was Castanopsis tibetana of which important value and growing stock in whole stand were 36.2% and 71.4% respectively. The species richness (R),Shannon-Wiener index (SW),evenness (E) and ecological dominance (ED) in tree layer were 21,3.70,0.50 and 0.105 respectively,and they were 4,1.11,0.20 and 0.571 respectively in tree sub-layerⅠ,and 21,3.91,0.56 and 0.041 respectively in tree sub-layerⅡ. The species richness (R),Shannon-Wiener index (SW),evenness (E) and ecological dominance (ED) in shrub layer were 44,4.63,0.61 and 0.060 respectively. The stand average DBH,height,density and growing stock were 29.6 cm,15.7 m,790 N/hm 2 and 395.5 m3/hm2 respectively,and they were 50.0 cm,18.1 m,214 N/hm2 and 329.4 m3/hm2 respectively in tree sub-layerⅠ,and 16.4 cm,11.4 m,576 N/hm2 and 66.1 m3/hm2 respectively in tree sub-layerⅡ.

Cite this article

Yuande DENG , Zhizhong LIU , Xiuping XU . Study on the Characteristics of Old Natural Forest of Castanopsis tibetana in Liangyeshan National Nature Reserve of Fujian Province[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2021 , 0(6) : 105 -110 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2021.06.017

References

[1] 《福建森林》编辑委员会. 福建森林[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1993.
[2] 郑万钧. 中国树木志[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1985.
[3] 宋晓英. 福建三明钩锥种群与主要伴生树种生态位研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2002, 31(3):27-30.
[4] 林敏, 黄宗安. 钩锥种群生命表分析[J]. 福建林业科技, 2003, 30(2):9-13.
[5] 张嘉生. 钩锥群落优势植物种群竞争的研究[J]. 福建林业科技, 2005, 32(4):82-85.
[6] 孙延军, 张冰, 林石狮, 等. 江西三清山优势种群钩锥一山蜡梅群落研究[J]. 广西植物, 2011, 31(1):70-74.
[7] 刘仁林, 王娟, 廖为明. 10种壳斗科植物果实主要营养成分比较分析[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2009, 31(5):901-905.
[8] 马冬雪, 刘仁林. 9种壳斗科树种坚果3种矿质元素及Vc含量分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2011, 24(2):253-255.
[9] 林鹏. 福建梁野山自然保护区综合科学考察报告[M]. 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 2001.
[10] 王伯荪, 余世孝, 彭少麟, 等. 植物群落学实验手册[M]. 广州: 广东高等教育出版社, 1996.
[11] 孟宪宇. 测树学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1996.
[12] 黄清麟, 董乃钧, 李元红. 福建中亚热带天然阔叶林的主要类型与特征[J]. 山地学报, 1999, 17(4):368~374.
[13] 黄清麟, 李志明, 郑群瑞. 福建中亚热带天然阔叶林理想结构探讨[J]. 山地学报, 2003, 21(1):116-120.
Outlines

/