Soil Distribution Characteristics,Physical and Chemical Properties in Lhasa Valley

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.04.018

欢迎访问林草资源研究

FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT ›› 2017›› Issue (4): 117-123.doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.04.018

• Scientific Research • Previous Articles Next Articles

Soil Distribution Characteristics,Physical and Chemical Properties in Lhasa Valley

LU Zeyang()

Academy of Forest Inventory and Planning,SFA,Beijing 100714,China

Received:2017-05-20 Revised:2017-06-08 Online:2017-08-28 Published:2020-09-24

Abstract

CLC Number:

S714

LU Zeyang. Soil Distribution Characteristics,Physical and Chemical Properties in Lhasa Valley[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, (4): 117-123.

Figures/Tables 11

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

Tab.5

Tab.6

Tab.7

Tab.8

Tab.9

Tab.10

Tab.11

深度/cm	pH	OM	全N/%	C/N	全P/%	砂粒 2~0.02	粉粒 0.02~0.002	粘粒 <0.002	质地
0~8	8.2	0.26	0.025	6.0	0.114	93.8	3.8	2.4	砂土
8~19	8.8	0.18	0.023	4.5	0.094	93.9	3.4	2.7	砂土
19~40	8.8	0.21	0.020	6.1	0.113	95.8	2.4	1.8	砂土
40~62	8.9	0.29	0.028	6.0	0.068	95.2	2.6	2.2	砂土
62~80	8.8	0.18	0.021	5.0	0.091	95.6	2.2	2.2	砂土

深度/cm	pH	OM	全N/%	C/N	全P	全K/%	碱解N	速效P /(mg/kg)	速效K	CEC /(coml/kg)
0~11	7.9	0.54	0.049	6.4	0.079	2.76	35	4.6	41	3.7
11~25	9.2	0.46	0.040	6.7	0.071	2.68	26	2.5	19	4.0
25~40	8.7	0.47	0.039	7.0	0.090	2.59	21	0.4	15	4.3
40~75	8.0	0.27	0.030	5.2	0.056	2.57	16	1.4	24	4.4
75~100	7.8	0.16	0.019	4.9	0.073	2.49	4	4.0	23	2.8

深度/cm	pH	OM	全N/%	C/N	全P	全K/%	碱解N	速效P /(mg/kg)	速效K	CEC /(coml/kg)
0~18	6.5	2.24	0.141	9.2	0.145	2.05	87	21.6	80	9.3
18~36	6.8	1.65	0.094	10.2	0.142	2.02	65	8.2	60	8.8
36~58	7.1	0.58	0.046	7.3	0.157	2.24	22	3.3	51	7.6
58~100	7.3	0.048	0.041	6.8	0.125	2.09	20	3.7	51	7.5

深度/cm	pH	OM	全N/%	C/N	全P	全K/%	碱解N	速效P /(mg/kg)	速效K	CEC /(coml/kg)
0~10	8.4	1.60	0.019	9.7	0.053	2.27	66	3.0	59	7.5
10~34	8.3	0.96	0.059	9.7			47	3.3	42	6.5
34~57	7.9	0.42	0.024	10.2	0.035	2.42	26	2.4	20	3.8
57~72	7.7	0.37	0.022	9.8			21	2.6	14	3.5

深度/cm	pH	OM	全N/%	全P	全K	碱解N	速效P /(mg/kg)	速效K	CEC /(coml/kg)
~19	8.2	1.32	0.106	0.133	1.53	72	8.0	100	10.7
19~44	8.5	1.29	0.089	0.133	1.60	56	9.7	100	10.2
44~70	8.6	0.46	0.047	0.138	1.34	24	2.5	73	8.6
70~100	8.1	0.82	0.054	0.127	1.51	27	3.0	113	10.4

Soil Distribution Characteristics,Physical and Chemical Properties in Lhasa Valley

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 6

Related Articles 14

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

深度/cm	pH	OM	全N/%	C/N	全P	全K/%	碱解N	速效P /(mg/kg)	速效K	CEC /(coml/kg)
0~11	6.4	2.02	0.103	11.4	0.043	3.35	90	1.9	90	5.6
11~39	7.0	1.36	0.082	9.6	0.036	3.38	63	1.6	56	7.2
39~58	7.1	1.41	0.075	10.9	0.026	3.59	54	1.4	61	10.8
58~76	7.5	0.50	0.035	8.3	0.021	3.54	27	1.7	49	5.9
78~100	7.5	0.31	0.023	7.8	0.032	3.80	20	3.6	42	6.0

深度/cm	pH	OM	全N/%	C/N	全P	全K/%	碱解N	速效P /(mg/kg)	速效K	CEC /(coml/kg)
0~20	7.2	2.61	0.140	10.8	0.085	2.36	122	4.4	115	9.4
20~30	7.1	1.91	0.112	9.9	0.099	2.36	105	3.0	112	8.0
30~55	7.2	0.56	0.052	6.2	0.081	2.89	27	2.6	104	7.1
55~90	7.3	0.30	0.030	5.8	0.056	2.84	14	6.8	64	3.8
90~120	7.5	0.86	0.060	8.3	0.081	2.79	27	10.8	76	9.1

深度/cm	pH	OM	全N/%	C/N	全P	全K/%	碱解N	速效P /(mg/kg)	速效K	CEC /(coml/kg)
0~15	7.3	3.86	0.219	10.2	0.094	2.40	148	12.3	160	15.0
15~28	7.5	3.54	0.201	10.2	0.095	2.49	139	10.7	113	14.8
28~64	7.9	0.93	0.071	7.6			31	8.6	63	8.7
64~100	8.0	0.84	0.059	8.3			36	7.1	59	7.4

深度/cm	pH	OM	全N/%	C/N	全P	全K/%	碱解N	速效P /(mg/kg)	速效K	CEC /(coml/kg)
0~16	1	2.37	0.143	9.6	0.120	1.64	73	0.6	95	7.7
16~29	4	0.58	0.045	7.5	0.136	1.52	22	0.8	44	4.7
29~50	4	0.51	0.040	7.4	0.108	1.71	17	1.0	41	6.1
50~75	4	0.52	0.031	9.7	0.103	1.70	12	2.8	40	6.9

深度/cm	pH	OM	全N/%	C/N	全P	全K/%	碱解N	速效P /(mg/kg)	速效K	CEC /(coml/kg)
0~3	7.4	1.78	0.109	9.5	0.074	0.074	77	3.8	169	7.1
3~19	8.0	1.42	0.084	9.8	0.077	0.077	56	1.1	77	7.7
19~50	7.3	0.38	0.029	7.6	0.115	0.115	20	1.8	26	3.7
50~105	8.4	0.67	0.042	9.2	0.066	0.066	24	1.4	36	8.0
105~150	8.4	0.33	0.022	8.7	0.060	0.060	17	2.4	28	11.2

海拔高度/m	生物气候带	土壤带
5300~6000	寒带半干旱半湿润冰缘带稀疏垫状植被	高山寒漠土带
4700~5200	寒带(亚寒带)半湿润高山草甸植被	高山草甸土带
4100~4600	亚寒带(寒温带)半湿润半干旱高山草甸植被	亚高山草甸土带
3600~3900	温带(寒温带)半干旱山地灌丛草原植被	山地灌丛草原土带

[1]	除多, 张镱锂, 郑度. 拉萨地区土地利用变化[J]. 地理学报, 2006,61(10):1075-1083.
[2]	蒋俊明, 扎西土登, 杨道贵, 等. 西藏左贡苗圃土壤肥力特征及水分动态研究[J]. 四川林业科技, 2002,23(2):33-38.
[3]	寇韬. 拉萨半干旱河谷立地分类与评价[M]. 西藏农牧学院, 2010.
[4]	杨小林, 赵垦田, 马和平, 等. 拉萨市半干旱河谷地带植被建设技术研究概述[J]. 西藏科技, 2009(9):74-76.
[5]	尹志芳, 欧阳华, 徐兴良, 等. 拉萨河谷灌丛草原与农田水热平衡及植被水分利用特征[J]. 地理学报, 2009,64(3):303-314.
[6]	张万儒, 盛伟彤, 蒋有绪. 中国森林立地分类系统[J]. 林业科学研究, 1992,5(3):251-261.

[1]	ZHANG Shulan, ZHANG Haijun, ZHANG Yihao, WU Xiaoyu. Effects of Forest Types at Different Altitudes on Soil Hydrological Functions in Huoditang,Qinling Mountains [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024, 0(4): 39-47.
[2]	FENG Ru, HAO Chenyang, MA Xiuzhi, LI Yiqian, LI Changsheng, ZHANG Zhijie. Effects of Short-Term Simulated Warming on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Pinus tabulaeformis Plantations in Daqing Mountain [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(2): 141-148.
[3]	SA Rula, HU Richa, YU Xiaoyu, WANG Zirui. Soil Physicochemical Properties of Betula platyphylla Secondary Forest Under Different Disturbances in Daxing' anling [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(2): 135-140.
[4]	SUN Shufa, ZHOU Yuan, YU Miao, YANG Quanxi, LI Yuxuan, WU Jinfeng, CHU Jiangwei. A Study on Current Situation and Prospects of the Effects of Vehicle Operation on Forest Soil [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(4): 19-27.
[5]	Jiangui PENG. Dynamic Analysis on the Effect of Pinus massoniana Plantation Management at Different Growth Stages [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(1): 62-69.
[6]	ZHOU Huiping, WANG Xiaobing, CAO Yinghui, WANG Aizhi, LIANG Wanyan. A Study on Vertical Distribution Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon in Juniper Plantation [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(6): 108-114.
[7]	SUN Yu, LI Jiping, CAO Xiaoyu, XU Zhanyong. Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Fertility of Cunninghamia lanceolata Ecological Public Welfare Forests in Different Age Groups [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(1): 57-62.
[8]	ZHOU Quan, WANG Ruihui, ZHONG Cheng, ZHOU Yangchao, FU Weinan. Effects of Thinning on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Soil and Water Conservation of Cunninghamia lanceolata Plantation in Different Age Forests [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2018, 0(4): 47-54.
[9]	QIN Zuoyu,TANG Jian,CAO Jizhao,WANG Huili,DENG Xiaojun,PAN Bo. Assessment of Soil Fertility of Continuous Plantation of Chinese Fir Based on Principal Component and Cluster Analysis [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2015, 0(5): 81-87.
[10]	WANG Xianan, ZHOU Zhengli, WANG Liang, LIANG Jiye, LU Ruiheng. Analysis on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Different Habitats in the Middle Reaches of the Tarim River [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2015, 0(1): 95-100.
[11]	XU Qingxiang, WEI Xing. Effects of the Structure Readjustment of Mixed Stands of Ash and Larch on Physical and Chemical Properties of Soil in Ash Stand [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2013, 0(2): 64-70.
[12]	QIN Qiyun, CAO Jizhao, LI Jun, HUANG Kaiyong, TANG Jian. Research on the Variation of the Soil Fertility in the Planted Young Pinus massoniana Forest and Comprehensive Evaluation of Its Soil Fertility [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2013, 0(1): 80-85.
[13]	HUANG Xianglan, YANG Zhenyi, XUE Li. Research Advances in Effects of Thinning on Artificial Forest [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2013, 0(1): 62-67.
[14]	MA Liqiang, HAO Yuguang, ZHANG Qiuliang, ZHANG Hongli, LIU Yang. Effects of Farmland Sheltbelts of Different Arrangements on Soil Fertility [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2009, 0(6): 91-95.