Forest and Grassland Resources Research ›› 2025›› Issue (2): 68-78.doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2025.02.007
• Research paper • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Xun1,2(
), ZHANG Yan1,2(
), PENG Bin1,2
Received:2024-12-19
Revised:2025-03-02
Online:2025-04-28
Published:2025-12-04
CLC Number:
LI Xun, ZHANG Yan, PENG Bin. Mass loss characteristics of mixed decomposition of leaf litter in burned areas of high-altitude forests[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2025, (2): 68-78.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.lyzygl.com.cn/EN/10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2025.02.007
Tab.2
Detailed description of the different treatments
| 凋落叶处理 | 树种组合 | 处理名称 | 混合比例 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 单一树种 | 高山松/高山栎/冷杉(P.densata/Q.semicarpifolia/A.fabri) | P/Q/A | |
| 2个树种 | 高山松+高山栎(P.densata+Q.semicarpifolia) | PQ | 3∶1、1∶1、1∶3 |
| 高山松+冷杉(P.densata+A.fabri) | PA | 3∶1、1∶1、1∶3 | |
| 高山栎+冷杉(Q.semicarpifolia+A.fabri) | QA | 3∶1、1∶1、1∶3 | |
| 3个树种 | 高山松+高山栎+冷杉(P.densata+Q.semicarpifolia+A.fabri) | PQA | 2∶2∶1、2∶1∶1、1∶1∶1、1∶1∶2、1∶2∶2 |
Tab.3
Initial mass characteristics of leaf litter g/kg
| 处理 | 全碳 | 全氮 | 全磷 | 木质素 | 纤维素 | 总酚 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | 380.98±26.17a | 6.60±0.11d | 0.55±0.02j | 349.35±22.70def | 224.95±41.48ab | 23.06±0.28bcde |
| Q | 402.96±12.85a | 2.64±0.07m | 0.75±0.05ef | 435.06± 5.73a | 164.24± 4.72cd | 18.16±2.23i |
| A | 381.74±38.10a | 7.50±0.32a | 0.95±0.02a | 200.78±11.05k | 154.45±20.49d | 25.43±1.45a |
| PQ31 | 386.48±17.13a | 5.61±0.09gh | 0.60±0.02i | 370.78±17.29cd | 259.77± 9.52ab | 21.84±0.35defg |
| PQ11 | 391.97± 8.74a | 4.62±0.07k | 0.65±0.03h | 392.20±12.10c | 261.26± 7.20ab | 20.61±0.98fgh |
| PQ13 | 397.47± 5.79a | 3.63±0.06l | 0.70±0.04g | 413.63± 7.60b | 262.75± 4.91a | 19.38±1.60hi |
| QA31 | 381.17±14.90a | 6.83±0.03cd | 0.65±0.01h | 312.21±19.59gh | 232.32±11.84abc | 23.65±0.53abcd |
| QA11 | 381.36±13.98a | 7.05±0.11bc | 0.75±0.01ef | 275.06±16.57i | 206.36±11.83bc | 24.25±0.83abc |
| QA13 | 381.55±24.60a | 7.28±0.21ab | 0.85±0.01c | 237.92±13.69j | 180.41±11.82c | 24.84±1.14ab |
| PA31 | 397.65±19.07a | 3.86±0.11l | 0.80±0.04d | 376.49± 4.47c | 236.80± 4.95ab | 19.97±1.51ghi |
| PA11 | 392.35±25.38a | 5.07±0.17j | 0.85±0.03c | 317.92± 5.54gh | 208.56± 6.48abc | 21.79±0.94defg |
| PA13 | 387.04±31.73a | 6.29±0.24e | 0.90±0.02b | 259.35± 8.04i | 212.19±24.63abc | 23.61±0.91abcd |
| PQA221 | 389.92± 8.68a | 5.20±0.05ij | 0.71±0.02fg | 353.92±11.53de | 239.90± 8.12ab | 21.57±0.67efg |
| PQA211 | 386.66± 9.74a | 5.84±0.05fg | 0.70±0.02g | 333.63±14.1efg | 233.81± 9.51abc | 22.43±0.39cdef |
| PQA111 | 388.56±12.30a | 5.58±0.09h | 0.75±0.02ef | 328.39±11.24fg | 225.43± 8.73abc | 22.22±0.57def |
| PQA112 | 386.85±18.24a | 6.06±0.14ef | 0.80±0.02d | 296.49±10.99h | 207.86± 9.51abc | 23.02±0.63bcde |
| PQA122 | 390.07±16.96a | 5.38±0.12hi | 0.79±0.02de | 324.20± 8.95g | 259.77± 9.52ab | 22.05±0.72def |
Tab.4
Mass loss rate of leaf litter in burned and non-burned forest area %
| 凋落叶 处理 | 样地 区域 | 每30天质量损失率 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4个月 | 8个月 | 16个月 | ||
| P | BF | 3.92±0.05A | 1.75±0.23B | 2.14±0.35B |
| NBF | 2.76±0.68A | 1.45±0.63A | 1.56±0.15A | |
| Q | BF | 2.85±0.38A | 1.89±0.29A | 1.94±0.46A |
| NBF | 2.37±0.29A | 1.49±0.36A | 1.70±0.26A | |
| A | BF | 3.67±0.33A | 0.82±0.25B | 1.49±0.47B |
| NBF | 2.77±0.13A | 2.25±0.23A | 1.04±0.28B | |
| PQ31 | BF | 3.23±0.22A | 1.77±0.26B | 2.99±0.42AB |
| NBF | 1.28±0.35B | 1.25±0.78B | 2.44±0.52A | |
| PQ11 | BF | 3.61±0.07A | 1.20±0.44B | 2.45±0.44AB |
| NBF | 2.48±0.66A | 0.77±1.07B | 2.30±0.63A | |
| PQ13 | BF | 3.50±0.36A | 2.41±0.48A | 2.81±0.43A |
| NBF | 1.83±0.33B | 1.40±0.65B | 2.39±0.08A | |
| QA31 | BF | 4.08±0.16A | 1.16±0.34B | 1.63±0.10B |
| NBF | 3.59±0.36A | 1.13±0.53B | 1.39±0.10B | |
| QA11 | BF | 3.79±0.11A | 1.07±0.13B | 2.20±0.47B |
| NBF | 2.68±0.41A | 1.80±0.09A | 1.65±0.33A | |
| QA13 | BF | 4.55±0.40A | 0.80±0.48A | 2.49±0.63AB |
| NBF | 3.07±0.90A | 0.95±0.52B | 1.75±0.20AB | |
| PA31 | BF | 4.00±0.08A | 0.78±0.17C | 2.02±0.47B |
| NBF | 2.19±0.90A | 2.70±1.22A | 1.12±0.41B | |
| PA11 | BF | 3.59±0.44A | 1.49±0.19B | 2.29±0.40AB |
| NBF | 1.08±0.76B | 2.89±1.35A | 1.04±0.25B | |
| PA13 | BF | 3.41±0.21A | 1.23±0.12B | 1.72±0.57B |
| NBF | 2.32±0.79A | 1.58±0.72AB | 1.17±0.22B | |
| PQA221 | BF | 3.69±0.30A | 1.03±0.44B | 3.07±0.05A |
| NBF | 1.52±0.33A | 1.64±0.46A | 1.98±0.22A | |
| PQA211 | BF | 3.07±0.12A | 1.83±0.36B | 2.64±0.33AB |
| NBF | 1.43±0.62A | 1.45±0.51A | 1.83±0.25A | |
| PQA111 | BF | 3.11±0.53A | 0.67±0.30B | 1.82±0.41AB |
| NBF | 2.22±0.48A | 1.93±0.29AB | 1.38±0.27B | |
| PQA112 | BF | 2.66±0.37A | 1.77±0.30A | 1.83±0.52A |
| NBF | 1.69±0.45A | 1.43±0.33A | 1.15±0.42A | |
| PQA122 | BF | 3.70±0.37A | 1.34±0.23B | 2.10±0.21B |
| NBF | 2.62±0.08A | 1.76±0.28B | 1.57±0.04B | |
| [1] | 盖鹤, 朱文文, 张敏, 等. 次生盐化对溪流底栖分解者和凋落物分解的影响[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2024, 45(3):32-44. |
| [2] | 朱德煌, 王金燕, 黄慧婷, 等. 闽楠林土壤-凋落物-叶片碳氮磷生态化学计量对人为干扰的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(12):5050-5059. |
| [3] | 张晓曦, 胡嘉伟, 刘凯旋, 等. 黄土丘陵区刺槐人工林林龄增加土壤微环境变化对凋落物分解的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(7):2931-2945. |
| [4] | 罗国娜, 车震宇. 马尾松凋落物对土壤氮循环与微生物的影响[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 54(4):553-561. |
| [5] | 王俊贤. 喀斯特石漠化地区凋落物输入对土壤有机碳积累和稳定的调控机理[D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2024. |
| [6] | 杜丹丹. 黄土丘陵区三种林分凋落物分解对土壤有机碳含量及其稳定性的影响[D]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2024. |
| [7] | 马慧霞. 凋落物和林下植被对大别山森林生态系统土壤呼吸的影响[D]. 保定: 河北大学, 2024. |
| [8] | 董灵波, 刘兆刚. 不同强度的林火干扰对天然落叶松林分物种多样性及碳储量的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2020, 48(9):45-50. |
| [9] |
REID J L, HOLL K D, ZAHAWI R A. Seed dispersal limitations shift over time in tropical forest restoration[J]. Ecological Applications, 2015, 25(4):1072-1082.
pmid: 26465043 |
| [10] | 刘宇, 王亚锋, 刘波, 等. 西藏米林高山松径向生长对气候变化的响应[J]. 第四纪研究, 2024, 44(4):928-938. |
| [11] | 于德水, 卢杰, 江村扎西, 等. 火干扰因素对藏南地区高山松径向生长及气候响应特征的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(20):8578-8586. |
| [12] | 赵彩云, 陆双飞, 李荣亮, 等. 气候变化下西南地区主要亚热带常绿栎属乔木地理分布研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2024, 32(3):357-366. |
| [13] |
LIAO Ziyan, NOBIS M P, XIONG Qonli, et al. Potential distributions of seven sympatric sclerophyllous oak species in Southwest China depend on climatic,non-climatic,and independent spatial drivers[J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2021, 78(5):1-22.
doi: 10.1007/s13595-020-01014-3 |
| [14] | 魏靖轩, 许昆, 张远东, 等. 川西康定云冷杉径向生长对气候变化响应的差异[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(23):10906-10914. |
| [15] | 于振江. 雅江县恶古乡林火对火烧迹地土壤结构及水理性质影响研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2020. |
| [16] | 谢金娟. 马尾松与不同阔叶树种凋落物混合分解特征及其对土壤养分的影响[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2024. |
| [17] |
VANDERBILT K L, WHITE C S, HOPKINS O, et al. Aboveground decomposition in arid environments:Results of a long-term study in central New Mexico[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2008, 72(5):696-709.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.10.010 |
| [18] |
TERRILL T. Determination of extractable and bound condensed tannin concentrations in forage plants,protein concentrate meals and cereal grains[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2010, 58(3):321-329.
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.v58:3 |
| [19] | 李宜浓, 周晓梅, 张乃莉, 等. 陆地生态系统混合凋落物分解研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(16):4977-4987. |
| [20] |
THROOP H L, ABU SALEM M, WHITFORD W G. Fire enhances litter decomposition and reduces vegetation cover influences on decomposition in a dry woodland[J]. Plant Ecology, 2017, 218(7):1-13.
doi: 10.1007/s11258-016-0694-6 |
| [21] |
JOHANNES H C C, SASKIA G, LIENEKE M V, et al. Are litter decomposition and fire linked through plant species traits?[J]. New Phytologist, 2017, 216(3):653-669.
doi: 10.1111/nph.14766 pmid: 28892160 |
| [22] | 孔健健, 杨健. 火干扰对北方针叶林土壤环境的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2014, 45(2):291-296. |
| [23] | 王莎莎. 喀斯特石漠化地区凋落物和外源钙输入对土壤有机碳和微生物群落结构的影响[D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2024. |
| [24] | 侯卓男, 张新军, 王瑞红, 等. 不同海拔高寒森林凋落物分解过程中土壤微生物群落的变化[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2024, 29(2):36-46. |
| [25] | 吴金桔. 沿纬度梯度树木叶凋落物光降解变化特征及其驱动因素[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳大学, 2024. |
| [26] |
KING J Y, BRANDT L A, ADAIR E C. Shedding light on plant litter decomposition:advances,implications and new directions in understanding the role of photodegradation[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2012, 111(1-3):57-81.
doi: 10.1007/s10533-012-9737-9 |
| [27] |
RATHOD T D, SAHU S K, TIWARI M, et al. Light absorption enhancement due to mixing in black carbon and organic carbon generated during biomass burning[J]. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2021, 12(12):101236.
doi: 10.1016/j.apr.2021.101236 |
| [28] | 张悦, 张艺凡, 马怡波, 等. 森林生态系统凋落物分解影响因素研究进展[J]. 环境生态学, 2023, 5(4):45-56. |
| [29] | 代松家, 周晨霓, 段斐, 等. 组分和生境差异对藏东南原始冷杉林凋落物分解和养分释放特征的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学(中英文), 2020, 18(6):72-80. |
| [30] | 王光军, 田大伦, 闫文德, 等. 去除和添加凋落物对枫香(Liquidambar formosana)和樟树(Cinnamomum camphora)林土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(2):643-652. |
| [31] |
赵红梅, 程军回, 张文太, 等. 古尔班通古特沙漠 5 种植物凋落物分解特征[J]. 中国沙漠, 2020, 40(2):165-176.
doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2019.00081 |
| [32] | 周文昌, 牟长城, 刘夏, 等. 火干扰对小兴安岭白桦沼泽和落叶松-苔草沼泽凋落物和土壤碳储量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(20):6387-6395. |
| [33] | RIETL A J, JACKSON C R. Effects of the ecological restoration practices of prescribed burning and mechanical thinning on soil microbial enzyme activities and leaf litter decomposition[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012,50:47-57. |
| [34] |
PELLEGRINI A F A, CAPRIO A C, Georgiou K, et al. Low-intensity frequent fires in coniferous forests transform soil organic matter in ways that may offset ecosystem carbon losses[J]. Global Change Biology, 2021, 27(16):3810-3823.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.v27.16 |
| [35] | HOPKINS J R, SEMENOVA N T, SIKES B A. Fungal community structure and seasonal trajectories respond similarly to fire across pyrophilic ecosystems[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2021, 97(1):1-13. |
| [36] |
VILD O, KALWIJ J M, HEDL R, et al. Effects of simulated historical tree litter raking on the understorey vegetation in a central European forest[J]. Applied Vegetation Science, 2015, 18(4):569-578.
doi: 10.1111/avsc.12180 pmid: 29242706 |
| [37] |
王淳, 董雪婷, 杜瑞鹏, 等. 华北落叶松与阔叶树种混合凋落叶分解过程中养分释放和酶活性变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5):1709-1716.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202105.008 |
| [38] | DAY T A, BLISS M S, TOMES A R, et al. Desert leaf litter decay:Coupling of microbial respiration,water-soluble fractions and photodegradation[J]. Global Chang Biology, 2018,24:5454-5470. |
| [39] | 李勋, 黄从飞, 高一航, 等. 川西北地区高寒森林火烧迹地3种凋落叶混合分解初期全碳释放特征[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2024, 42(6):1290-1299. |
| [40] | MÉNDEZ M S, MARTINEZ M L, ARAUJO P I, et al. Solar radiation exposure accelerates decomposition and biotic activity in surface litter but not soil in a semiarid woodland ecosystem in Patagonia,Argentina[J]. Plant and Soil, 2019,445:483-496. |
| [41] | DAY T A, URBINE J M, Bliss M S. Supplemental precipitation accelerates decay but only in photodegraded litter and implications that sunlight promotes leaching loss[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2022,158:113-129. |
| [42] |
NOPS J M, WEDIN D A, Tilman D. Biodiversity and decomposition in experimental grassland ecosystems[J]. Oecologia, 2001, 126(3):429-433.
doi: 10.1007/s004420000537 pmid: 28547458 |
| [43] |
RUSTAD L E. Element dynamics along a decay continuum in a red spruce ecosystem in Maine,USA[J]. Ecology, 1994, 75(4):867-879.
doi: 10.2307/1939412 |
| [44] |
MUDRICK D A, HOOSEIN M, Hicks J R, et al. Decomposition of leaf litter in an Appalachian forest:effect s of leaf species,aspect,slope position and time[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 1994, 68(2-3):231-250.
doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(94)90048-5 |
| [45] |
NILSSON M C, WARDLED D A, DAHLBERG A. Effects of plant litter species composition and diversity on the boreal forest plant-soil system[J]. Oikos, 1999, 86(1):16-26.
doi: 10.2307/3546566 |
| [1] | YANG Yuhao, WANG Lingling, ZHANG Yong, ZHANG Quanzhi, SUN Hanjing, WANG Wenpeng, ZHOU Benzhi, WANG Zeng. Soil Physicochemical Properties and Plant Diversity Characteristics of Cupressus funebris with Different Stand Ages in Limestone Mountain Areas [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024, 0(5): 106-115. |
| [2] | HAO Siran, MENG Zhongju. Impact of Different Vegetation Restoration Types on Soil in the Wind-sand Inflow Section of the Hobq Desert [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024, 0(5): 96-105. |
| [3] | JIANG Shengxiu, ZHAO Peng, ZHANG Junnian, LI Delu, LIU Zixi. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Organic Carbon in Typical Vegetation in the Qilian Mountains [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024, 0(2): 1-7. |
| [4] | LIU Xuejian, ZHANG Zhihua, HAO Beibei, WANG Nan, MA Yu, HE Bin, ZHANG Siyi. Effects of Eucalyptus Afforestationon the Soil Organic Carbon Pool on the Hillslope of in the Red Soil Collapsing Erosion Area [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2023, 0(6): 75-81. |
| [5] | LI Li, WU Yuehong, XIAO Zexin, JI Yanling, LIN Wenhuan, ZHU Xiaowu, FAN Zhenzhen. Characterization of Soil Ecological Stoichiometry in Plantation Forests of Different Stand Ages of Sonneratia apetala [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2023, 0(6): 113-119. |
| [6] | YANG Zhi, LI Xiaoying, YUAN Yong, YU Hu, LI Jinxi. Characteristics and Influence Factors of Aoil Urease in a Typical Monsoon Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forest in Southern Yunnan [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(4): 71-79. |
| [7] | LI Siying, GUO Haotian, CHEN Xiaowei, ZHOU Mengli, JIN Shanshan, YAN Dongfeng. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon in Quercus variabilis Plantation and Its Influencing Factors [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(4): 80-89. |
| [8] | HE Bin, LI Qing, LI Wangjun, ZOU Shun, BAI Xiaolong, FENG Tu. Soil Nutrient and C:N:P Stoichiometry of Different Aged Pinus armandii Plantations [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(1): 71-79. |
| [9] | YANG Junheng, CUI haijun, SHI Xunxun, GUO Ying, ZHANG Putao, BI Xiaoting. Effects of Long-Term Drainage for Afforestation on Soil Physicochemical Properties of Subtropical Sphagnum Mire in Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(1): 80-86. |
| [10] | WANG Hui, CHEN Aitao, XU Li. Effects of Different Tending Methods on Tree Growth and Soil Nutrients in Secondary Birch Forest [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(zk1): 85-90. |
| [11] | YANG Liu, SHAO Hongyuan, LI Xiao, XU Guoqiao, MA Jiaojiao, JIA Yanlong, XU Zhongqi. Rhizosphere Soil Chemical Properties of Different Tree Species in Mountain Areas of Northern Hebei [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(5): 153-159. |
| [12] | LI Xiaoying, QIN Wenjing, XU Yanhong, WANG Yuechao, YANG Neng, YANG Ben. Understory Species Diversity and its Relationship with Soil Propertiesof theTypical Public Welfare Forests in Central Yunnan [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(4): 148-156. |
| [13] | FANG Fazhi, LI Zhaojia, GUI Huiyin, WU Zhongqin. Effects of Exotic Tree Species on Soil Physicochemical Property in Limu Mountain of Hainan [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(3): 104-109. |
| [14] | DONG Yanli, CHEN Aihua, QI Guangzeng, ZHANG Feng, WANG Yazhu, TIAN Jinhua. Study on Soil Quality and Vegetation Changes of Abandoned Farmland in Shallow Qilian Mountains [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(3): 110-116. |
| [15] | OU Zeyu, PENG Zhen, WANG Yuanyuan, ZHANG Xidan, RAO Feng, XIE Peilin, WAN Pan. Effects of Management Methods on Soil Organic Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Oak Secondary Forests [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(3): 96-103. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||