Target Tree Tending Optimal Management of Ecological Landscape Forest Coupled with the Scenic Beauty Estimation

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.06.017

Abstract

Abstract:

The Jinsiwan Forest Park in Fujian Sanming is taken as the object and 8 sample plots are set up.In addition stand structure index and landscape factor before optimizing the management are taken as the variables,then the multiple linear regression model is built,a further target tree tending optimal management of ecological landscape forest is set up coupled with the scenic beauty estimation and implemented at the same time.Meanwhile,this paper discusses the effect of this method on the characteristics of the stand structure community,the stand structure and the aesthetic quality of the ecological landscape forest.And the results showed that compared with the data before adjustment,the mingling intensity,angular scale and size ratio of the stand structure were 1.699%,2.083% and 0.800% respectively;The Margalef richness index,Simpson diversity index and Pielou evenness index had increased and the growth rate was 4.508%,2.841% and 3.030% respectively. The optimized scenic beauty of the stand structure has been greatly improved,the increased rate is 90.788%. Based on the target tree management strategy,the adjustment technique of stand structure of landscape forest can satisfy the ecological requirement of ecological regional function,which makes the stand structure be further optimized,the species diversity be increased,and landscaping value of the forest resources be improved.Target tree tending optimal management of ecological landscape forest coupled with the scenic beauty estimation provides a feasible method for forest stand optimization of ecological scenic forest.

Key words: target tree tending, ecological landscape forest, optimal management strategy, scenic beauty estimation

CLC Number:

S759.5

AI Jingwen, LIU Jian, YU Kunyong, ZHANG Jinzhao, ZHAO Qiuyue, SHANGGUAN Shayi. Target Tree Tending Optimal Management of Ecological Landscape Forest Coupled with the Scenic Beauty Estimation[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, 0(6): 94-102.

Figures/Tables 12

Fig.1

Tab.1

Tab.2

Fig.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

Fig.3

Tab.5

Tab.6

Fig.4

Tab.7

Tab.8

References 23

[1]	王嘉楠, 张磊, 吴泽民, 等. 合肥市环城公园生态风景林的景观评价及生态功能[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010,38(3):111-114.
[2]	陈鑫峰, 贾黎明, 王雁, 等. 京西山区风景游憩林季相景观评价及经营技术原则[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2008,30(4):39-45.
[3]	邓送求. 间伐强度对城郊生态风景林景观质量的影响[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2009: 45-46.
[4]	缪林海. 生态风景林景观质量评价初探[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2008: 12-15.
[5]	国家林业局. 全国森林经营规划(2016—2050年)[M]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016: 17-18.
[6]	Miller G W, Stringer J W, Mercker D C, et al. Technical guide to crop tree release in hardwood forests[C]// Knoxville:University of Tennessee Extension,University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension and Southern Regional Extension Forestry, 2007.
[7]	陈鑫峰, 贾黎明. 京西山区森林林内景观评价研究[J]. 林业科学, 2003,39(4):59-66. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20030410
[8]	李俊英, 闫红伟, 唐强, 等. 沈阳森林植物群落结构与其林内景观美学质量关系研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2011,26(2):212-219.
[9]	邓送求, 闫家锋, 王宇, 等. 间伐强度对不同林分类型美景度的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010,38(3):4-7.
[10]	俞晓凌, 廖邦洪, 王道模, 等. 龙门山国家地质公园天台山风景游憩林空间结构分析与美景度评价[J]. 林业科学, 2011,47(7):50-56. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20110708
[11]	刘翠玲, 潘存德, 寇福堂, 等. 新疆喀纳斯旅游区森林景观美学质量与自然火干扰的关系[J]. 林业科学, 2010,46(1):9-14. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.2010010102
[12]	马克平, 刘玉明. 生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅰ α多样性的测度方法(下)[J]. 生物多样性, 1994,2(4):231-239.
[13]	赵中华, 惠刚盈, 胡艳波, 等. 角尺度判断林木水平分布格局的新方法[J]. 林业科学, 2016,52(2):10-16. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20160202
[14]	汤孟平, 娄明华, 陈永刚, 等. 不同混交度指数的比较分析[J]. 林业科学, 2012,48(8):46-53. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20120808
[15]	赵中华, 惠刚盈, 胡艳波, 等. 基于大小比数的林分空间优势度表达方法及其应用[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2014,36(1):78-82.
[16]	张凯旋, 凌焕然, 达良俊. 上海环城林带景观美学评价及优化策略[J]. 生态学报, 2012,32(17):5521-5531. doi: 10.5846/stxb201112071874
[17]	Meadows J S, Stanturf J A. Silvicultural systems for southern bottomland hardwood forests[J]. Forest Ecology & Management, 1997,90(2-3):127-140.
[18]	王雁, 陈鑫峰. 心理物理学方法在国外森林景观评价中的应用[J]. 林业科学, 1999,35(5):110-117.
[19]	董文泉, 周光亚, 夏立显. 数量化理论及其应用[M]. 长春: 吉林人民出版社, 1979: 4-9.
[20]	叶宝鉴. 福州北山常绿阔叶林重构的物种配置模式及造林技术[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2013; 33-42.
[21]	惠刚盈, 李丽, 赵中华, 等. 林木空间分布格局分析方法[J]. 生态学报, 2007,27(11):4717-4728.
[22]	Stringer J W, Miller G W, Wittwer R F. Applying a crop-tree release in small-sawtimber white oak stands.[M]. Washington DC:USDA Forest Service, 1988.
[23]	Liocourt F D. De l’aménagement des sapinières[J]. Bull.Soc.Franche-Comté et Be lfort, 1898:396-409.

标准地号	林分密度 /(株/hm²)	平均胸径 /cm	平均树高 /m	Margalef 丰富度指数	Simpson 多样性指数	Pielou 均匀度指数	混交度M	角尺度W	大小比U
1	1724.138	15.271	14.116	1.262	0.640	0.732	0.600	0.542	0.520
2	1814.093	15.130	12.613	1.660	0.677	0.748	0.620	0.555	0.520
3	824.588	19.926	15.274	0.514	0.479	0.575	0.260	0.582	0.470
4	1034.483	21.262	17.117	0.945	0.512	0.585	0.420	0.638	0.520
5	1274.363	13.949	15.449	1.576	0.628	0.690	0.610	0.561	0.500
6	914.543	26.750	18.024	1.460	0.293	0.330	0.300	0.563	0.490
7	1589.205	15.073	12.550	1.930	0.588	0.646	0.500	0.564	0.490
8	869.565	19.985	13.623	1.478	0.404	0.454	0.460	0.603	0.490
全林分	1255.622	18.418	14.846	1.353	0.528	0.594	0.471	0.576	0.500

编号	项目	类目
编号	项目	1	2	3
1	林木覆盖度	低	中	高
2	树冠层次	高低错落	一致
3	树冠质地	刚性	柔性	混合
4	林分格局	随机	均匀	聚集
5	林分色彩	单调	点缀	丰富

级别	描述
Ⅰ	树干通直且姿态美;树冠形态优美;色泽明亮,色彩纯净无多余杂色,有独特的观赏价值
Ⅱ	树干通直;树冠形态美;色泽明亮,色彩纯净无多余杂色
Ⅲ	树干轻度弯曲;树冠形态较美;色泽较明亮,掺杂些许杂色
Ⅳ	树干轻度弯曲;树冠形态一般;颜色一般,掺杂些许杂色
Ⅴ	树干分两枝且弯曲;树冠形态较差;色泽偏暗,掺杂些许不良杂色
Ⅵ	树干份多枝且弯曲;树冠形态差;色泽昏暗,掺杂大量不良杂色
Ⅶ	树干重度弯曲;树冠形态很差;色泽昏暗,颜色斑驳混杂,有病虫害或为枯倒木

竞争等级	1/2<CI_c≦1	1/3≦CI_c≦1/2	0≦CI_c<1/3
CI_h<0	Ⅰ	Ⅱ	Ⅲ
0≦CI_h≦0.5	Ⅳ	Ⅴ	Ⅵ
0.5<CI_h≦1	Ⅶ	Ⅷ	Ⅸ

经营	密度/ (株/hm²)	平均胸径 /cm	平均树高 /m	Margalef 丰富度指数	Simpson 多样性指数	Pielou 均匀度指数	混交度M	角尺度W	大小比U
伐前	1255.622	18.418	14.846	1.353	0.528	0.594	0.471	0.576	0.500
伐后	1139.430	17.812	14.354	1.414	0.543	0.612	0.479	0.564	0.496
变化/%	-9.254	-3.290	-3.314	4.508	2.841	3.030	1.699	-2.083	-0.800