欢迎访问林业资源管理

林业资源管理 ›› 2016, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 128-133.doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.04.023

• 科学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于GIS的城市山地公园视觉景观评价技术及实证

张强1, 潘辉2, 王燕玲1, 李阳骄1, 徐恒1, 黄豪璐1   

  1. 1.福建农林大学 园林学院,福州 350002;
    2.闽江学院,福州 350108
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-19 修回日期:2016-07-07 出版日期:2016-08-28 发布日期:2020-11-04
  • 通讯作者: 潘辉(1968-),男,福建福州人,教授、博士,硕导,主要研究方向为环境资源管理、生态旅游等。Email:fjpanhui@126.com
  • 作者简介:张强(1992-),男,安徽九华山人,在读硕士,从事风景园林研究。Email:562041190@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    福建省科技厅社会发展引导性项目(2015 Y0074)

Evaluation Technology and Demonstration of Visual Landscape of Urban Mountain Park Based on GIS

ZHANG Qiang1, PAN Hui2, WANG Yanling1, LI Yangjiao1, XU Heng1, HUANG Haolu1   

  1. 1. College of Landscape Architecture of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350002,China ;
    2. Minjiang University,Fuzhou 350108,China
  • Received:2016-04-19 Revised:2016-07-07 Online:2016-08-28 Published:2020-11-04

摘要: 城市山地公园不同于城市公园,也不同于森林公园,既具有原生山地植被类型,又有人为的公共空间的营造,具有一定特殊性。因此探讨基于GIS技术的城市山地公园视觉景观评价量化技术具有理论价值和实践意义。以福州金鸡山城市山地公园为实例,在中小尺度下对坡度、坡向、高程因子进行模拟,最后用GIS软件分析和问卷评分结果进行叠加分析,尝试其视觉景观评价技术。研究结果表明,景点4(叠石飞瀑)、10(飞虹桥)、15(晋安台)、19(栖霞台)的视觉景观较好,景点5(森林舞台)视觉景观最差,从而验证了GIS在中小尺度下,在城市山地公园视觉景观评价中应用的可行性,为类似区域的视觉景观评价技术提供参考和依据。

关键词: 城市山地公园, 视觉景观, GIS

Abstract: Compared with general urban park or forest park,urban mountain park has a great particularity,it owns unique spatial distribution,ecological composition,landscape composition and climate environment.Thus,it is of theoretical value and practical significance to explore the quantitative technology of urban mountain park visual landscape evaluation based on GIS technology.This paper takes Fuzhou Jinji Mountain Park as an example,the data are quantitated based on the simulation and application of GIS to small and medium-scale urban mountain's slope and aspect,elevation,and the questionnaire score obtained by human's subjective landscape perception,and then the results were weighted based on GIS and questionnaire score.The results showed that the landscape vision spot 4 (Rockery waterfall),10 (Fei Hong bridge),15 (Jin An station),19 (Qixia station) was better,while the spot of 5 (forest stage) was the worst.The application in different scales of visual landscape evaluation system were verified on this account,and the results would provide references and suggestions for the establishment of urban mountain evaluation system.

Key words: urban mountain park, landscape vision, GIS

中图分类号: