欢迎访问林业资源管理

林业资源管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 25-30.doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2022.03.004

• 综合管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

野生动物刑事案件鉴定泛化问题探析

吴君霞(), 蒋敬, 周用武   

  1. 南京森林警察学院,南京210046
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-29 修回日期:2022-04-16 出版日期:2022-06-28 发布日期:2022-08-04
  • 作者简介:吴君霞(1974-),女,河南汝州人,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为环境与资源刑事保护。Email: wu9066@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    2020年司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目“野生动物刑事案件证明问题研究”(20SFB4044)

An Analysis on Over-Identification in Wildlife Criminal Cases

WU Junxia(), JIANG Jing, ZHOU Yongwu   

  1. Nanjing Forest Police College,Nanjing 210046,China
  • Received:2022-03-29 Revised:2022-04-16 Online:2022-06-28 Published:2022-08-04

摘要:

在野生动物刑事案件中,鉴定是判别动物物种的重要方法。但在多种因素的影响下,当前司法实践中存在“有案必鉴”的鉴定泛化倾向。鉴定泛化可能造成诸多负面后果。破解鉴定泛化的路径在于:要认识到当前的动物物种鉴定存在错误风险,打破鉴定意见因科学而正确的迷思;正确理解刑事案件中追求真相的限度,合理划分鉴定与鉴定替代方法的适用范围;合理组织合议庭,降低法官的司法责任风险,提高司法裁决的公信力。

关键词: 野生动物, 刑事案件, 鉴定, 鉴定泛化, 形态鉴定

Abstract:

In wildlife criminal cases,identification is an important method to identify animal species.However,under the influence of various factors,there is a tendency of over-identification that "every case must be identified" in the current judicial practice.Over-identification may lead to many negative consequences.The way to crack over-identification lies in: recognizing the risk of errors in the current identification of animal species,and breaking the myth that expert opinions are scientifically correct;correctly understanding the limits of the pursuit of truth in criminal cases,and reasonably dividing the application scope of identification and identification's alternatives;reasonably organizing collegial panels to reduce the risk of judges' judicial liability and improve the credibility of judicial decisions.

Key words: wildlife, criminal cases, identification, over-identification, morphological identification

中图分类号: