欢迎访问林草资源研究
Scientific Research

Comparison of Shrub and Grass Carbon Density in the Different Types of Climate of the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River

  • DI Fuhong
Expand
  • The Forest Inventory & Planning Institute of Shanxi province,Taiyuan 030012,China)

Online published: 2020-11-20

Abstract

In order to understand the differences of carbon density of shrub and grass in the middle reaches of the Yellow River in different climate types,three different climate(sub) areas in Shanxi province were chosen as the research objects on the basis of detailed investigation.In the typical area of each of three different climate(sub) areas the carbon density of shrubs,grass,their fine roots and surrounding soils was determined.The results showed that the trend of variation of carbon density of shrub and grass vegetation was evident from north to south in the middle reaches of the Yellow River with an increase in temperature and precipitation.The vegetation carbon density increased significantly and the carbon density of grass was higher than that of shrub;the carbon density difference in shrub between the ground and underground parts was bigger,whereas the carbon density difference in grass between the ground and underground parts was smaller.Moreover,the distribution pattern of shrub and grass between the ground and underground parts were similar.The soil organic carbon was mainly distributed in the 0~20 cm range of depth.In the northern,central and southern parts soil carbon density decreased with the increase of soil depth and soil carbon density in southern part was significantly higher than that in the northern part.

Cite this article

DI Fuhong . Comparison of Shrub and Grass Carbon Density in the Different Types of Climate of the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2015 , 0(5) : 50 -54 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2015.05.009

References

[1]金小华,刘宏纲,宋永昌.安徽黟县次生灌丛和灌草丛生产力的研究[J].植物生态学与地植物学学报,1990(3):267-274.
[2]曾绮微,李海生,陈桂珠.香港灌丛植被的数量分类与环境关系分析[J].环境科学研究,2007,20(5):45-49.
[3]刘国华,马克明,傅伯杰.岷江干旱河谷主要灌丛类型地上生物量研究[J].生态学报,2003,23(9):1757-1764.
[4]Sturm M,Racine C,Tape K.Increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic[J].Nature,2001,411:546-547.
[5]Goodale C L,Davidson E A.Uncertain sinks in the shrubs[J].Nature,2002,418:593-594.
[6]Jackson R B,Banner J L,Jobbagy E G,et al.Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands[J].Nature,2002,418:623-626.
[7]Connolly McCarthy B J,Grigal D F.Biomass of shrub dominated wetlands in Minnesota[J].Forest Science,1985,31:1011-1017.
[8]姜凤岐,卢凤勇.小叶锦鸡儿灌丛地上生物量的预测模式[J].生态学报,1982(2):103-110.
[9]会峰,王志恒,刘国华,等.中国主要灌丛植被碳储量[J].植物生态学报,2006,30(4):539-544.
[10]慕萍,山西省气候资源图集[M].北京:气象出版社,1997.
[11]Anderson J M.Soil and climate change [J].Adv.Ecol.Res.,1992,22:188-210.
[12]林清山,洪伟.中国森林碳储量研究综述[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(6):220-224.
[13]Jenkinson D S,Adams D E,Wild A.Model estimates of CO2 emissions from soil in response to global warming[J].Nature,1991,351:304-306.
Outlines

/