欢迎访问林草资源研究
Scientific Research

Influence of Soil Physico-chemical Properties in Maowusu Sandland on the Stability and Productivity of Hippophae rhamnoides subsp.sinensis Plantation

  • ZENG Cheng ,
  • CHEN Beibei ,
  • XIAO Zhiyong ,
  • LI Tianjiang ,
  • LI Sunling ,
  • DAI Guanghui ,
  • LI Genqian
Expand
  • 1. Southwest Forestry University,Kunming,Yunnan 650224,China;
    2. Yichun Research Institute of Forestry,Yichun 336000,Jiangxi,China;
    3. Yunnan Academy of Forestry,Kunming 650204,China;
    4. Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China

Received date: 2015-11-04

  Revised date: 2015-11-26

  Online published: 2020-11-04

Abstract

In order to know the impact of soil moisture on the stability and productivity,the plantations located in flatland and low-lying land in Maowusu sandland were selected to do comparative analysis on corresponding characteristics with a view to providing reference for the Maowusu Sandland afforestation design and site selection.The results show that the soil moisture content,total phosphorus and total kalium content of low-lying land were all significantly higher than flatland,but the soil moisture content played a dominant role in the formation of the characteristics of the plantation;the tree height growth,forestry productivity and ramet number of low-lying land were significantly higher than flatland,and its plantation age structure belongs to a growing(or stable) one,but the flatland belongs to declining type.Thus,forestry productivity and plantation stability have good consistency,as the soil moisture contentis higher,the forestry productivity and plantation stability of low-lying land become better,as the soil moisture content is lower,the forestry productivity and plantation stability of flatland become worse.

Cite this article

ZENG Cheng , CHEN Beibei , XIAO Zhiyong , LI Tianjiang , LI Sunling , DAI Guanghui , LI Genqian . Influence of Soil Physico-chemical Properties in Maowusu Sandland on the Stability and Productivity of Hippophae rhamnoides subsp.sinensis Plantation[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2016 , 0(1) : 99 -104 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.01.017

References

[1] 张根臣,刘俊宝,李永路,等.浅论沙棘及其功效应用[J].中国西部科技,2011,10(5):54-55.
[2] 贺斌,李根前,徐德兵,等.沙棘克隆生长及其生态学意义[J].西北林学院学报,2006,21(3):54-59.
[3] 李根前,唐德瑞,赵一庆.沙棘的生物学与生态学特性[J].西北植物学报,2000,20(5):892-897.
[4] 胡建忠,包文林,李敏,等.毛乌素沙地南缘陕甘三县市沙棘种植情况考察报告[J].沙棘,1995,8(4):13-16.
[5] Silvertown J,Franco M,Pisanty I,et al.Comparative plant demography-relative importance of life-cycle components to the finite rate of increase in woody and herbaceous perennials[J].Journal of Ecology,1993,81:465-476.
[6] Takahashi M K,Horner L M,Kubota T,et al.Extensive clonal spread and extreme longevity in saw palmetto,a foundation clonal plant[J].Molecular Ecology,2011,20:3730-3742.
[7] 吕荣森.沙棘在中国西部生态环境建设中的作用[J].沙棘,2003,16(1):3-7.
[8] 刘增文,高国雄,吕月玲,等.不同立地条件下沙棘种群生物量的比较与预估[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2007,31(1):37-41.
[9] 魏宇昆,梁宗锁,韩蕊莲,等.黄土高原不同立地条件下沙棘的生产力与水分关系研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(2):195-200.
[10] 李子敬,袁玉欣,刘炳响,等.铁尾矿区沙棘林生物量与生产力的研究[J].西北林学院学报,2008,23(3):16-20.
[11] 阮成江,李代琼.半干旱黄土丘陵区沙棘林地土壤水分及其对沙棘生长影响研究[J].水土保持通报,1999,19(5):27-30.
[12] 魏巍,李根前,李甜江,等.不同灌水强度下中国沙棘苗木生长过程[J].林业科学研究,2012,25(3):317-324.
[13] 肖智勇,李根前,李甜江,等.黄土高原不同坡向中国沙棘种群生物量投资与分配[J].东北林业大学学报,2011,39(5):1-4.
[14] 曹子林,肖智勇,高辉,等.毛乌素沙地土壤理化性质对中国沙棘人工林生长的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2015,30(2):22-26.
[15] 代光辉,李根前,李甜江,等.水分条件对中国沙棘生长及种群稳定性的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2011,26(2):1-8.
[16] 徐德兵,李根前,贺斌,等.中国沙棘种群稳定性维持机制的探讨[J].福建林业科技,2008,35(2):148-152.
[17] 张耀,李甜江,李根前.中国沙棘克隆生长调节与种群稳定性维持[J].国际沙棘研究与开发,2007,5(1):27-32.
[18] 吴秀峰.陕西省榆林地区农业区划[Z].榆林:榆林地区农业计划委员会,1987:2-16.
[19] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:146-336.
[20] 李甜江,李根前,徐德兵,等.中国沙棘克隆生长对灌水强度的响应[J].生态学报,2010,30(24):6952-6960.
[21] 贺斌,李根前,高海银,等.不同土壤水分条件下中国沙棘克隆生长的对比研究[J].云南大学学报:自然科学版,2007,29(1):101-107.
[22] 贺斌,赵粉侠,李根前,等.毛乌素沙地中国沙棘克隆生长对土壤水分含量的响应[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2012,36(4):46-50.
[23] 贺斌,李根前,李周岐,等.木本克隆植物中国沙棘种群数量与结构对土壤水分的响应[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2007,35(3):183-187.
[24] 李根前,黄宝龙,唐德瑞,等.毛乌素沙地中国沙棘无性系生长格局与生物量分配[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2001,29(2):51-55.
[25] Harper J L.Modules,branches and the capture of resources[M]//Jackson J B C,Buss L W,Cook R E Population Biology and Evolution of Clonal Prganisms.New Haven:Yale University Press,1985.
[26] Lovett D L.Population dynamics and specialization in a clonal perennial(Rannunculus repens)I:The dynamics of ramets in contrasting habitats[J].J.of Ecol.,1981,69:743-755.
[27] Slade A J,Hutching M J.The effects of nutrient availability of foraging in the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea [J].J.of Ecol.,1987,75:95-112.
[28] Pan J J,Price J S.Fitness and evolution in clonal plants:the impact of clonal growth[J].Evolutionary Ecology,2002,15:583-600.
[29] Schmid B.Some ecological and evolutionary consequences of modular organi-zation and clonal growth in Plants[J].Evolutionary Trend in Plant,1990,4:25-34.
Options
Outlines

/