欢迎访问林草资源研究

The Comparison on the Fire Prevention Effectiveness of Interplanting Different Broad-leave Tree Species in Pinus massnoniana Stand

  • Shaoshuan CHEN ,
  • Bin CHEN ,
  • Shurong CHEN
Expand
  • 1. Forestry Science and Technology Promotion Center of Sanming City,Sanming,Fujian 365000,China
    2. Sanming State-owned Forest Farm Management Station,Sanming,Fujian 365000,China
    3. Youxi State-owned Forest Farm Management Station,Youxi,Fujian 365100,China

Received date: 2019-06-12

  Revised date: 2019-07-04

  Online published: 2020-10-20

Abstract

In order to explore the problem of solving the fire risk of Pinus massoniana,interplanting Altingia gracilipes,Schima superba and Phoebe bournei under the canopy of P.massoniana was tested.After 20 years of stand improvement,the biomass,undergrowth vegetation analysis,canopy structure,microclimate and fire resistance were analyzed,results show that combustible was 37.91±4.55 t/hm 2 in P.massoniana,combustible were found in the mixed forests of P.massoniana with A.gracilipes,S.superba,P.bournei,which were 23.71±2.36 t/hm 2、22.54±1.85 t/hm 2、21.58±2.03 t/hm 2.The undergrowth vegetation of P.massoniana were Dicranopteris dichotoma and miscellaneous bamboo,while the undergrowth vegetation of mixed forest were dominated by one or two-year-old shady herbs.The spatial structure of P.massoniana were composed of forest canopy,undergrowth vegetation and litter layer,while that of mixed forest were composed of forest canopy,broad-leaved forest canopy,undergrowth vegetation layer and litter layer.The ignition temperature of P.massoniana leaves was lower than that of broad-leaved trees,and the oil content was higher than that of broad-leaved trees.The temperature of P.massoniana were higher than those of mixed forest,and the humidity of P.massoniana were higher than those of mixed forest.When broad-leaved trees were intercropped in P.massoniana,the fire-fighting efficiency was significantly improved.The fire-fighting efficiency ranged from high to low as follows:P.massoniana and A.gracilipesP.massoniana and S.superbaP.massoniana and P.bourneiP.massoniana.

Cite this article

Shaoshuan CHEN , Bin CHEN , Shurong CHEN . The Comparison on the Fire Prevention Effectiveness of Interplanting Different Broad-leave Tree Species in Pinus massnoniana Stand[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2019 , 0(4) : 137 -142 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.04.020

References

[1] 肖化顺, 刘发林, 向顺常 , 等. 马尾松群落防火林带有效宽度模型研究[J]. 西北林学院学报 2008,23(1):134-137.
[2] 邓海康 . 怀集县木荷防火林带的防护效能[J]. 广东林业科技, 2004,20(3):9-12.
[3] 王晓阳 . 试述生物防火阻隔带的重要性和建设对策[J]. 广西林业, 2002,(6) 6:10-12.
[4] 田晓瑞, 舒立福, 乔启宇 , 等. 南方林区防火树种的筛选研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2001(5):43-47.
[5] 张思玉, 张志翔 . 杉木马尾松木荷人工纯林与混交林火灾隐患的对比分析[J]. 森林防火, 2001(3):27-30.
[6] 吴载境 . 疏伐强度对马尾松套种阔叶树林分生长的影响[J]. 福建林业科技, 2018,45(1):53-57.
[7] 詹学齐 . 马尾松林冠下套种阔叶树20年间土壤肥力变化[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018,40(6):55-62.
[8] 陈绍栓, 许建伟, 吴载璋 , 等. 不同强度疏伐对马尾松林分水源涵养功能时空格局的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017,37(20):6753-6760.
[9] 詹学齐 . 马尾松公益林林冠下套种阔叶树后林分生态功能评价研究[J]. 福建师范大学学报, 2018,34(3):71-77.
[10] 吴载璋 . 马尾松套种细柄阿丁枫对林分涵养水源功能的影响[J]. 亚热带农业研究, 2016,12(3):181-186.
[11] 陈淑容 . 马尾松细柄阿丁枫混交林防火效能研究[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2012,23(6):75-77.
[12] 李振问, 阮传成, 王国熙 . 细柄阿丁枫杉木混交林的燃烧性研究[J].林业科技通讯, 1997(2):19-21.
[13] 张思玉, 陈戈萍 . 基于防火的杉木幼林生物质能持续利用研究[J].林业资源管理, 2011(6):79-82.
Outlines

/