欢迎访问林草资源研究

Forest and Grassland Resources Research >

2017 , Vol. 0 >Issue 6: 47 - 53

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.06.009

Scientific Research

The Design of the Pinus massoniana-Quercus griffithii Mixed Forest Clear-cutting Silviculture System

  • Xiaoming WANG ,
  • Yuanchang LU ,
  • Haitao XING ,
  • Hongyan JIA ,
  • Xianzhao LIU ,
  • Yangsheng XIE ,
  • Ji Zeng
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Forest Resources Information Technologies,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Beijing,100091,China
    2. Experimental Centre of Tropical Forestry,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Pingxiang,Guangxi,532600,China

Received date: 2017-09-21

  Revised date: 2017-11-16

  Online published: 2020-09-28

Fold

Abstract

Close-to-nature forestry (CTNF) aims to maintain and enhance the multiple functions of forest.The design of the silviculture systems adapting to the CTNF is a key step in the implementation of CTNF,as well as a challenge to the forest managers in China.Using the data accumulated from the Experimental Centre of Tropical Forestry (ECTF),Chinese Academy of Forestry,this study analyzed the growth of P.massoniana and its multiple accompany species in the P.massoniana-broadleaved mixed forests,which were converted from the P.massoniana monocultures by installing various broadleaved species in the understorey.The results suggested the admixing of P.massoniana and Q.griffithii benefited the growth of both species.The P.massoniana-Q.griffithii mixed forest clear-cutting silviculture system was therefore proposed,providing a detailed demonstration of the design of the silviculture system adapting to the close-to-nature forestry,which would facilitate the close-to-nature conversion of P.massoniana plantation in China.

Key words： close-to-nature silviculture; coniferous-broadleaved mixed forest; Pinus massoniana; Quercusgriffithii; full-cycle forest cultivation process table; stem growth

Cite this article

Xiaoming WANG , Yuanchang LU , Haitao XING , Hongyan JIA , Xianzhao LIU , Yangsheng XIE , Ji Zeng . The Design of the Pinus massoniana-Quercus griffithii Mixed Forest Clear-cutting Silviculture System[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2017 , 0(6) : 47 -53 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.06.009

References

[1] Buahus J, Puettmann K J, KüHne K C. Close-to-nature forest management in Europe:does it support complexity and adaptability of forest ecosystems[C]// Messier C,Puettmann K J,Coates K D (eds) Managing forests as complex adaptive systems:building resilience to the challenge of global change.London:Routledge, 2013.
[2] Bieling C. Non-industrial private-forest owners:possibilities for increasing adoption of close-to-nature forest management[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2004,123:293-303.
[3] Stone R. Nursing China’s ailing forests back to health[J]. Science, 2009,325(31):556-558.
[4] Jiang J, Lu Y, Pang L, et al. Short-term effects of the management intensities on structure dynamic in monoculture forests of southern subtropical China[J]. Tropical Conservation Science, 2015,8:187-200.
[5] 邢海涛, 陆元昌, 刘宪钊, 等. 基于近自然改造的马尾松林分竞争强度研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016,38(9):42-54.
[6] 刘宪钊. 热带海岸木麻黄人工林近自然经营模式研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2011.
[7] 于政中. 森林经理学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1993.
[8] Gilge H, Grulich H, Pfeiffer G, et al. WaldwirtschaftHeute[M]. Leopoldorf:OesterreichischerAgrarverlag, 2001.
[9] 陆元昌. 近自然森林经营的理论与实践[M]. 北京: 中国科技出版社, 2006.
[10] 陆元昌, 刘宪钊, 包源, 等. 多功能目标下的近自然森林经营作业法研究[J]. 西南林学院学报, 2011,31(4):1-6.
[11] Schütz J P. Development of close to nature forestry and the role of ProSilva Europe[J]. ZbornikGozdarstva in Lesarstva, 2011,94:39-42.
[12] Duncker P S, Barreiro S M, Hengeveld G M, et al. Classification of forest management approaches:anew conceptual framework and its applicability to European forestry[J]. Ecology & Society, 2012,17(4):51.
[13] 陆元昌, 雷相东, 洪玲霞, 等. 近自然森林经理计划体系技术应用示范[J]. 西南林学院学报, 2010,30(2):1-6.
[14] Khanna P K. Comparison of growth and nutrition of young monocultures and mixed stands of Eucalyptus globules and Acacia mearnsii[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 1997,94(1-3):105-113.
[15] Piottod, Viques E, Montagnini F, et al. Pure and mixed forest plantations with native species of the dry tropics of Costa Rica:a comparison of growth and productivity[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004,190:359-372.
[16] Erskine P D, Lamb D, Bristow M. Tree species diversity and ecosystem function:can tropical multi-species plantations generate greater productivity?[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006,233:205-210.
[17] Jandla R, Lindnerb M, Vesterdalc L, et al. How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration?[J]. Geoderma, 2007,137(3-4):253-268.
[18] Einollah R M, Seyedmoshen H, Ezzatollah E, et al. Comparison of growth,nutrition and soil properties of pure stands of Quercus castaneifolia and mixed with Zelkova carpinifolia in the Hyrcanian forests of Iran[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008,255(3-4):1149-1160.
[19] Dr?sslerl, ?vergaard R, EK? P M, et al. Early development of pure and mixed tree species plantations in Snogeholm,southern Sweden[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2015,30:304-316.
[20] Kramer P J, Kozlowski T. Physiology of trees[M]. Lisboa:McGraw-Hill, 1960.
[21] Sayyad E, Hosseini S M, Mokhtari J, et al. Comparison of growth,nutrition and soil properties ofpure and mixed stands of Populus deltoids and Alnussubcordata[J]. Silva Fennica, 2006,40(1):27-35.
[22] Gamfeldt l, Sn?ll T, Bagchi R, et al. Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species[J]. Nature Communications, 2013,4:1340.
[23] 罗应华, 孙冬婧, 林建勇, 等. 马尾松人工林近自然化改造对植物自然更新及物种多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013,33(19):6154-6162.
[24] 汤文彪. 红锥马尾松混交林效益与营造技术[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2008,14(5):169-171.
[25] 樊后保, 李燕燕, 黄玉梓, 等. 马尾松纯林改造成针阔混交林后土壤化学性质的变化[J]. 水土保持学报, 2006,20(4):77-81.
[26] 姜俊. 热带山地人工针阔混交林结构动态及作业法应用研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2015.
[27] Yachi S, Loreau M. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment:The insurance hypojournal[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 1999,96(4):1463-1468.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉