欢迎访问林草资源研究
Scientific Research

The Litter Storage Capacity and Water-holding Characteristics of 5 Typical Forests in Baihua Mountain

  • Yinting GONG
Expand
  • Academy of Forest Inventory and Planning,National Forestry and Grassland Administration,Beijing 100714,China

Received date: 2019-04-28

  Revised date: 2019-06-21

  Online published: 2020-09-25

Abstract

Taking five typical forest types in the Baihuashan National Nature Reserve as the research object,the litter accumulation and water holding characteristics of the five forest types in Baihuashan were quantitatively analyzed.And the results show that,among the litter accumulations of 5 types of forests in Baihua Mountain,Larix gmelinii(15.75 t/hm2)>Juglans mandshurica (9.99t/hm2)>Picea meyeri (10.27t/hm2)>Mongolia oak (7.34t/hm2)>Betula nigra (7.04t/hm2),the proportion of undissolved layer in litter layer of coniferous forest was significantly higher than that of broad-leaved forest;among the total water holding capacity of 5 forests in Baihua Mountain,Larix gmelinii(2.91mm)>Juglans mandshurica (2.77mm)>Betula nigra (1.90mm)>and Mongolia oak (1.83mm) >Picea meyeri (1.29mm);in the litter layer of coniferous forest,the water holding capacity of undissolved layer is greater than that of semi-decomposed layer,while in the litter layer of broad-leaved forest,the water holding capacity of semi-decomposed layer is greater than that of non-decomposed layer.The accumulation and hydrological effects of litter in the undissolved layer of coniferous forest were higher than those in the semi-decomposed layer,while those in the semi-decomposed layer of broad-leaved forest were higher than those in the undissolved layer.

Cite this article

Yinting GONG . The Litter Storage Capacity and Water-holding Characteristics of 5 Typical Forests in Baihua Mountain[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2019 , 0(3) : 113 -117 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.03.019

References

[1] 张振明, 余新晓, 牛健植, 等. 不同林分枯落物层的水文生态功能[J]. 水土保持学报, 2005,19(3):139-143.
[2] 饶良懿, 朱金兆, 毕华兴. 重庆四面山森林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2005,27(1):33-37.
[3] 宁夏六盘山南侧森林枯落物及土壤的水文生态功能研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2007,20(1):15-20.
[4] 马琳, 李学斌, 谢应忠. 草地生态系统枯落物分解及功能研究[J]. 草业与畜牧, 2011(12):7-12.
[5] 施爽, 郭继勋. 松嫩草原三种主要植物群落枯落物层生态水文功能[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007,18(8):1722-1726.
[6] 莫菲, 于澎涛, 王彦辉, 等. 六盘山华北落叶松林和红桦林枯落物持水特征及其截持降雨过程[J]. 生态学报, 2008,29(6):2868-2876.
[7] 马正锐, 程积民, 班松涛, 等. 宁夏森林枯落物储量与持水性能分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2012,26(4):199-203.
[8] 郭辉, 董希斌, 蒙宽宏, 等. 小兴安岭低质林采伐改造后枯落物持水特性变化分析[J]. 林业科学, 2010,46(6):146-153.
[9] 周祥, 赵一鹤, 张洪江, 等. 云南高原典型林分林下枯落物持水特征研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2011,20(2):248-252.
[10] 赵磊, 王兵, 蔡体久, 等. 江西大岗山不同密度杉木林枯落物持水与土壤贮水能力研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2013(1):203-208.
[11] 顾宇书, 邢兆凯, 韩友志, 等. 浑河上游4种典型林分类型枯落物持水特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2013,37(1):31-36.
[12] 杨俊玲, 王新杰. 四种杉木人工林枯落物持水性研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2013,33(6):70-74.
[13] 贺宇, 丁国栋, 臧荫桐, 等. 燕山山地典型森林枯落物持水特性[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2012,30(2):161-166.
[14] 刘芝芹, 黄新会, 涂璟, et al. 云南高原不同林分类型枯落物储量及持水特性[J]. 生态环境学报, 2015(6):919-924.
[15] 赵鸣飞, 薛峰, 吕烨, 等. 黄土高原森林枯落物储量、厚度分布规律及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2016,36(22):7364-7373.
[16] 张祎, 李鹏, 刘晓君, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同植被类型枯落物持水效能研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2016,23(5):100-105.
[17] 韩友志, 邢兆凯, 顾宇书, 等. 浑河上游白桦冷杉等4种林分枯落物储量及持水特性[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2011,39(11):15-18.
Outlines

/