欢迎访问林草资源研究

Forest and Grassland Resources Research >

2025 , Vol. 0 >Issue 4: 112 - 121

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2025.04.012

Technical Application

Construction of evaluation index system for damage of forest ecological services and functions in Guangdong Province using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP)

  • Xiaoyuan ZHANG ,
  • Le LI ,
  • Nancai PEI ,
  • Bingtao GAO ,
  • Zezhou HAO ,
  • Jingyuan ZOU ,
  • Kai CUI ,
  • Li WANG
Expand
  • 1. South China Institute of Environmental Science,Ministry of Ecology and Environment,Guangzhou 510655,China
    2. Research Institute of Tropical Forestry,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Guangzhou 510520,China
    3. College of Forestry,Jiangxi Agricultural University,Nanchang 330045,China

Received date: 2025-05-31

  Revised date: 2025-08-12

  Online published: 2026-02-13

Fold

Abstract

With the increasing problems of the ecological environment,the assessment of damage to forest ecological services and functions has gradually become an important issue in the construction of environmental rule-of-law.However,there is no such evaluation index system for the damage to forest ecological services and functions in Guangdong Province.Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method,we constructed an assessment system for forest ecological environment damage,which is approximately equivalent to the loss of forest ecological services and functions and is suitable for fast evaluations at small spatial scales.By absorbing existing assessment methods of forest ecosystem service functions,we combined the six major ecological function zones in Guangdong Province and utilized expert scoring and the analytic hierarchy process to establish a new evaluation index system,including regulatory services,support services,and supply services.Through weight analysis,the regulatory service in the Nanling Mountain District had a high weight of 0.507,highlighting its core role in water conservation and pollution purification.The weight of support services in the central Guangdong region was 0.475,reflecting that soil and water conservation was crucial for maintaining the ecological security of the region itself.Supply services had a prominent weight in coastal areas (0.412),mainly due to the high economic value and biodiversity conservation functions of mangrove forests in this region.Therefore,through the AHP quantitative evaluation,there were differences in the dominant service types of different ecological functional areas,and protection strategies should be formulated according to local conditions.This result would provide a scientific basis for the protection and ecological restoration of forest resources in diverse regions across Guangdong Province,and points out the need to further optimize the objectivity of evaluation indicators and improve the legal framework to enhance the operability and scientificity of the damage assessment of forest ecological services and functions in the future.

Key words： Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); damage of forest ecological environment; ecosystem service; ecological function planning; Guangdong Province

Cite this article

Xiaoyuan ZHANG , Le LI , Nancai PEI , Bingtao GAO , Zezhou HAO , Jingyuan ZOU , Kai CUI , Li WANG . Construction of evaluation index system for damage of forest ecological services and functions in Guangdong Province using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP)[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2025 , 0(4) : 112 -121 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2025.04.012

References

[1] 江南, 徐卫华, 赵娟娟, 等. 生态系统原真性概念及评价方法:以长白山地区为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(10):1288-1294.
[2] 颜建军, 张熙文, 刘亦文, 等. 中国城市低碳治理的减污降碳协同效应:基于三批次低碳城市试点政策实施的准自然实验[J]. 环境科学学报, 2025, 45(6):1-15.
[3] 王淳, 郝泽周, 孙冰, 等. 珠三角彩叶林美学文化与功能评价指标体系构建[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 60(2):357-364.
[4] 卢廷艳, 罗华伟. 森林资源资产价值生态化实现的典型路径研究[J]. 甘肃科技, 2022, 38(1):121-128.
[5] 付博, 唐呈瑞, 崔胜涛, 等. 森林资源损害赔偿工作发展策略[J]. 林草政策研究, 2024, 4(2):62-68.
[6] 李兰莉. 基于社交媒体数据的森林生态系统文化服务价值感知研究:以太白山国家森林公园为例[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2023.
[7] 郭培培, 於方. 《生态环境损害鉴定评估技术指南森林(试行)》关键方法解读[C]// 中国环境科学学会2023年科学技术年会论文集(四). 北京: 生态环境部环境规划院, 2023:73-76.
[8] ATTIWILL P M. The disturbance of forest ecosystems:the ecological basis for conservative management[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 1994, 63(2-3):247-300.
[9] BARNTHOUSE L W, STAHL,JR. R G. Quantifying natural resource injuries and ecological service reductions:challenges and opportunities[J]. Environmental Management, 2002, 30(1):1-12.
[10] DUNFORD R W, GINN T C, DESVOUSGES W H. The use of habitat equivalency analysis in natural resource damage assessments[J]. Ecological Economics, 2004, 48(1):49-70.
[11] NESHAT A, PRADHAN B. Risk assessment of groundwater pollution with a new methodological framework:application of Dempster-Shafer theory and GIS[J]. Natural Hazards, 2015, 78(3):1565-1585.
[12] HOSSAIN MD U, POON C S, LO I M C, et al. Evaluation of environmental friendliness of concrete paving eco-blocks using LCA approach[J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21(1):70-84.
[13] DESVOUSGES W H, GARD N, MICHAEL H J, et al. Habitat and Resource Equivalency Analysis:A critical assessment[J]. Ecological Economics, 2018, 143:74-89.
[14] BISHOP R C, BOYLE K J, CARSON R T, et al. Putting a value on injuries to natural assets:the BP oil spill[J]. Science, 2017, 356(6335):253-254.
[15] 包蕊, 李涛, 张欣怡, 等. 森林生态系统损害评估体系与管理制度研究[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(3):924-933.
[16] 肖强, 肖洋, 欧阳志云, 等. 重庆市森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(1):216-223.
[17] 赵同谦, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 等. 中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(4):480-491.
[18] 李丽, 王心源, 骆磊, 等. 生态系统服务价值评估方法综述[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(4):1233-1245.
[19] 陈鹏. 厦门湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 湿地科学, 2006, 4(2):101-107.
[20] 白永飞, 赵玉金, 王扬, 等. 中国北方草地生态系统服务评估和功能区划助力生态安全屏障建设[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35(6):675-689.
[21] 刘清轩. 利益衡平视角下森林生态补偿法律制度研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2017.
[22] 焦睿. 以生态环境损害赔偿为目的的森林资源资产评估研究[D]. 济南: 山东财经大学, 2020.
[23] 崔久富, 郭贯成, 范怀超, 等. 全民所有自然资源资产核算的中国方案:基于土地分等定级的启示[J]. 中国土地科学, 2021, 35(1):18-25.
[24] 李敏, 周训芳. 论森林生态损害公益诉讼的主体[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 24(2):46-51.
[25] 李兴宇, 吴昭军. 全民所有自然资源损害救济的权利基础与实现路径:以国家所有权的私权定位为逻辑起点[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 35(4):97-107.
[26] 文敏, 张龙, 邹泽林, 等. 基于案例分析的森林生态环境损害价值评估研究[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2024, 51(2):76-80.
[27] 邓雪, 李家铭, 曾浩健, 等. 层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2012, 42(7):93-100.
[28] 吴文坤. 广东省生态系统服务时空特征演变及生态分区优化研究[D]. 广州: 仲恺农业工程学院, 2023.
[29] 国家林业和草原局. 森林生态系统服务功能评估规范:GB/T 38582—2020[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020.
[30] 杨雅婷, 殷勇, 蒋科迪. 陆海统筹视角下茂名市海岸带生态安全格局规划研究[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2022, 41(5):705-713.
[31] 卢婷, 姚娟, 赵向豪. 大喀纳斯旅游区生态系统供给服务价值评估及权衡分析[J]. 生态经济, 2018, 34(7):215-220.
[32] 程多威, 王灿发. 生态环境损害赔偿制度的体系定位与完善路径[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2016(5):81-85.
[33] 刘倩. 生态环境损害赔偿:概念界定、理论基础与制度框架[J]. 中国环境管理, 2017, 9(1):98-103.
[34] 乔一娜, 曹双成, 石孟迪, 等. 基于层次分析法的毛乌素榆林沙区防护林健康评价体系研究[J]. 林草资源研究, 2024(2):109-115.
[35] 朱照宇, 谢先德, 黄宁生, 等. 广东沿海区域可持续发展中的地质灾害防治[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2003(1):22-25.
[36] 方代有. 论粤西退化桉树林地的水土保持生态修复[J]. 亚热带水土保持, 2005, 17(3):22.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉