Forest and Grassland Resources Research >
Waterlogging tolerance of landscape plants in the Shisanling Reservoir downstream flood storage areas in Beijing
Received date: 2024-11-27
Revised date: 2025-05-10
Online published: 2026-01-07
The waterlogging tolerance in landscape plants serves as a critical selection criterion for optimized species screening in riparian landscaping.In the summer of 2023,a systematic field survey was conducted to assess the flood damage to 105 species(including cultivars)of landscape plants in the downstream flood storage areas,representing 39 families and 74 genera,following the controlled reservoir discharge from Shisanling Reservoir in Changping District,Beijing.The survey involved photographic documentation and written records of the growth vigor of the landscape plants.The waterlogging tolerance of the common landscape plant species in North China was stratified through comparative and inductive analysis.The results showed that:1)12 plants,such as Salix babylonica and Fraxinus chinensis,were most tolerant to waterlogging;2)13 plants,such as Diospyros kaki and Acer rubrum,were more tolerant to waterlogging;3)15 plants,such as Hibiscus grandiflorus and Iris lactea,were intermediately tolerant to waterlogging;4)15 plants,such as Pinus tabuliformis and Juniperus sabina,were less tolerant to waterlogging;5)50 plants,such as Helianthus annuus,Muhlenbergia capillaris,and Rhus typhina,were found to be least tolerant to waterlogging.Distinguishing the differences in waterlogging tolerance among plant species can provide a scientific basis and practical reference for the construction of waterfront parks and the selection of plant species in North China,as well as for landscape greening management.
Tantan LU . Waterlogging tolerance of landscape plants in the Shisanling Reservoir downstream flood storage areas in Beijing[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2025 , 0(3) : 64 -74 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2025.03.008
| [1] | 李娜, 王建强, 姚军, 等. 武汉长江两岸江滩公园2020年涝害植被调查[J]. 中国城市林业, 2021, 19(5):105-110. |
| [2] | 闫振华, 郝文强, 宋伟, 等. 2013年栖霞果园涝害调查及应对措施[J]. 落叶果树, 2014, 46(4):62-63. |
| [3] | 王建电. 柑桔涝害调查及抗涝栽培措施探讨[J]. 中国南方果树, 1999, 28(3):3-5. |
| [4] | 王月志, 戴美松, 蔡丹英, 等. 涝渍环境中梨树叶片氧化胁迫特征及抗氧化酶系活性分析[J]. 中国南方果树, 2020, 49(6):121-124. |
| [5] | 蓝松涛, 蓝净江, 郭尔祥. 园林植物对特大洪水的抗性调查[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2001(增刊):13-15. |
| [6] | 翟堃贝. 城市滨江植物洪灾抗性研究:以柳州市为例[J]. 绿色科技, 2018(21):89-91. |
| [7] | 何正安, 陈卫东, 高志军, 等. 常见城镇绿化树种耐水淹性状调查研究[J]. 湖南林业科技, 1997(2):70-72. |
| [8] | 甘美娜, 王栋宇, 吴新旺, 等. 华南地区几种常见植物的耐淹性研究[J]. 现代园艺, 2015(3):11-12. |
| [9] | 李连庆, 丁明堂, 王玉龙, 等. 扬州低湿滩地适生树种选择及造林技术与营林模式的调查分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2012, 40(7):178-181. |
| [10] | 武冠胜. 北京“23·7”特大暴雨洪水期间十三陵水库闸门调度分析[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2024, 34(6):53-56. |
| [11] | 顾佳清, 张智奇, 周音, 等. 树种耐水湿筛选研究综述[J]. 上海农业学报, 2004, 20(4):66-69. |
| [12] | 曹秋艳, 周润嫦. 基于“海绵城市”理念的四种园林植物耐水湿性研究:以韶关市为例[J]. 韶关学院学报, 2016, 37(12):35-39. |
| [13] | 冯艺. 郑州涝灾对园林植物的影响及水淹胁迫研究[D]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学, 2023. |
| [14] | 唐罗忠, 徐锡增, 方升佐. 土壤涝渍对杨树和柳树苗期生长及生理性状影响的研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 1998, 9(5):24-27. |
| [15] | 吴雅茹. 旱柳对涝渍胁迫的生理响应及抗涝关键基因挖掘[D]. 曲阜: 曲阜师范大学, 2024. |
| [16] | 李思源. 水淹胁迫对桑树幼苗生长及生理指标的影响[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2022. |
| [17] | 罗祺, 张纪林, 郝日明, 等. 水淹胁迫下10个树种某些生理指标的变化及其耐水淹能力的比较[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2007, 16(1):69-73. |
| [18] | 廖浩斌, 谭宗健, 孙红梅, 等. 水淹胁迫对4个树种幼苗叶片生理特征的影响[J]. 福建农业科技, 2018(11):10-14. |
| [19] | 汪贵斌, 曹福亮, 郭起荣. 淹水对银杏生长及生理的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 1998, 20(2):237-241. |
| [20] | 王婧. 萱草耐涝性评价及生理生化机理研究[D]. 上海: 上海应用技术大学, 2019. |
| [21] | 张起源, 张金政, 李晓东, 等. 长期淹水胁迫对东北玉簪生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2011, 39(3):200-203. |
| [22] | 赵婷. 美人蕉属植物耐涝性评价及对淹水胁迫的形态生理与基因表达差异响应[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2022. |
| [23] | 白果, 冷平生, 胡增辉. 水淹胁迫对4年生华北紫丁香生理指标的影响[J]. 西部林业科学, 2021, 50(4):101-106. |
| [24] | 曹红梅, 刘兴亮, 石溪婵, 等. 紫穗槐在水涝胁迫下的生理响应研究[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2009, 25(7):29-31. |
| [25] | 金茜, 王瑞, 周向睿, 等. 水淹胁迫对紫穗槐生长及营养元素积累的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2013, 30(6):904-909. |
| [26] | 邱崇洋, 杨炯超, 郭和蓉, 等. 8种狼尾草属植物的生长性状比较分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(6):97-101. |
| [27] | 侯新村, 滕珂, 郭强, 等. 狼尾草属牧草研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2022, 57(6):814-825. |
| [28] | 陈志彤, 何水林, 黄毅斌. 狼尾草属牧草研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2010, 18(5):740-748. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |