欢迎访问林草资源研究

Forest and Grassland Resources Research >

2025 , Vol. 0 >Issue 2: 1 - 10

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2025.02.001

Special Topic:Conservation and Utilization of Ancient Trees

Compensation standard and value assessment of ancient and famous trees protection

  • Feng WANG ,
  • Xianlei CAO ,
  • Jinbang WANG ,
  • Zhong QIN ,
  • Xingliang CHEN
Expand
  • 1. Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Beijing 100091,China
    2. Chinese Society of Forestry,Bijing 100091,China
    3. School of International Trade,Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,Taiyuan 030006,China
    4. Chinese Academy of Forestry,Beijing 100091,China

Received date: 2025-03-02

  Revised date: 2025-04-06

  Online published: 2025-12-04

Fold

Abstract

Reasonably determining compensation standards is a core issue in the protection and compensation of ancient and famous trees,and it is also a significant practical issue of concern to both the government and the academic community.Based on 391 questionnaires collected from 4 counties in 3 cities of 2 provinces(Yunnan and Zhejiang),we calculated the compensation standards for ancient and famous trees in China by means of the willingness to pay method(WTP) and the willingness to accept(WTA) method,and evaluated the value of ancient and famous trees in three cities.The study finds that:1) The willingness to pay(WTP) for the protection of ancient and famous trees is 222.34 yuan per year,and the willingness to accept(WTA) is 282.73 yuan per year,indicating that the compensation standard for the protection of ancient and famous trees should be within the range of 222.34-282.73 yuan per year.2) The WTP is mainly influenced by factors such as household population size,education level,average income,the perceived necessity of strict protection and management of ancient and famous trees,and satisfaction with the local protection outcomes of these trees.The WTA is primarily affected by age,household registration,household population size,and whether there is a recognition of the improved quality of life brought by ancient and famous trees.The results of this study provide a reference for the scientific formulation of compensation standards for the protection of ancient and famous trees.3) The research results based on the WTP method show that the total value of ancient and famous trees in the cities of Kunming,Hangzhou and Shaoxing is 1.74 billion yuan,2.77 billion yuan and 0.81 billion yuan,respectively.The results of the study based on the WTA method show that the total value of ancient and famous trees in the cities of Kunming,Hangzhou and Shaoxing is 1.4 billion yuan,2.87 billion yuan and 1.6 billion yuan,respectively.The research results will provide a scientific reference for formulating protection compensation standards for ancient and famous trees.

Key words： ancient and famous trees; compensation standards; value assessment; willingness to pay; willingness to accept

Cite this article

Feng WANG , Xianlei CAO , Jinbang WANG , Zhong QIN , Xingliang CHEN . Compensation standard and value assessment of ancient and famous trees protection[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2025 , 0(2) : 1 -10 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2025.02.001

References

[1] 国家林业和草原局. 第二次全国古树名木资源普查结果公布全国古树名木共计508.19万株[EB/OL].(2022-09-10)[2025-01-20]. https://www.forestry.gov.cn/search/27016.
[2] 古树名木保护条例[M]. 北京: 中国法治出版社, 2025.
[3] LIU Jiajia, XIA Shangwen, ZENG Di, et al. Age and spatial distribution of the world’s oldest trees[J]. Conservation Biology, 2023,36:e13907.
[4] LIU Jiajia, LINDENMAYER D B, YANG Wenjing, et al. Diversity and density patterns of large old trees in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019,655:255-262.
[5] LAI Poying, JIM C Y, TANG Guangda, et al. Spatial differentiation of heritage trees in the rapidly-urbanizing city of Shenzhen,China[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2019,181:148-156.
[6] FU Qingchen, QIU Erfa, ZHANG Yuan, et al. Discussion of the Distribution Pattern and Driving Factors of Large Old Tree Resources in Beijing[J]. Forests, 2023,13:1500.
[7] 黄蓉, 吴永华, 汉梅兰, 等. 兰州市单株古树名木资源组成和分布特征[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(5):182-188.
[8] 易善军, 姚晔, 崔健, 等. 玉屏侗族自治县古树名木资源特征分析及保护对策[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020(2):37-45.
[9] 吴仙花, 刘锋, 程兴丰, 等. 浙江开化古树名木资源特征及成因探析[J]. 自然保护地, 2023, 3(3):103-109.
[10] ZHANG Zhihua. Tree-rings,a key ecological indicator of environment and climate change[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015,51:107-116.
[11] 米锋, 李吉跃, 张大红, 等. 北京地区林木损失额的价值计量研究:有关古树名木科学文化价值损失额计量方法的探讨[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2006(增刊):141-148.
[12] YAO Na, GU Chenxi, QI Jinda, et al. Protecting rural large old trees with multi-scale strategies:Integrating spatial analysis and the contingent valuation method(CVM) for socio-cultural value assessment[J]. Forests, 2023, 15(1):18.
[13] 孙超, 车生泉. 古树名木景观价值评价:程式专家法研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2010(3):209-217.
[14] 王继程. 古树名木综合价值评价研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2011.
[15] 谭莹, 徐军, 林聪聪, 等. 基于层次分析法的浙江省古树名木资源综合价值评估研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2023(4):169-178.
[16] SON H J, XIA Tiantian, KIM Y H, et al. A value evaluation research of the old-growth and giant tree:Focus on Gyeongju Gyerim’s Zelkova Serrata.J.Korean Inst.Tradit[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2016,34:51-56.
[17] 杨娱, 田明华, 秦国伟, 等. 城市古树名木综合价值货币化评估研究:以北京市古树“遮荫侯”为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33(6):185-191.
[18] NEWTON P, NICHOLS E S, ENDO W, et al. Consequences of actor level livelihood heterogeneity for additionality in a tropical forest payment for environmental services programme with an undifferentiated reward structure[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2012, 22(1):127-136.
[19] 张颖, 李晓格. 甘肃省迭部县居民森林生态环境支付意愿影响因素分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2020, 33(10):2399-2411.
[20] 谢花林, 陈彬. 基于GEP的区域生态补偿标准研究:以江西省为例[J]. 生态经济, 2024, 40(11):146-154.
[21] 曹先磊, 刘高慧, 张颖, 等. 城市生态系统休闲娱乐服务支付意愿及价值评估:以成都市温江区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(9):2970-2981.
[22] 董冬, 周志翔, 何云核, 等. 基于游客支付意愿的古树名木资源保护经济价值评估:以安徽省九华山风景区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(11):1334-1340.
[23] CHEN Y W. Public willingness-to-pay for conserving urban heritage trees in Guangzhou,south China[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2015,14:796-805.
[24] 雷硕, 马奔, 温亚利. 北京市民对古树名木保护支付意愿及影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(4):73-79.
[25] 沈田华. 三峡水库重庆库区生态公益林补偿机制研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2013.
[26] SANTOS A C, VIANNA M I. Prevalence of stress reaction among telemarketers and psychosocial aspects related to occupation[J]. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 2011,65:A416.
[27] 李辉婕, 鲁盼, 汪兴东. 农村居民生态产品购买受偿水平影响因素及补偿标准研究:基于江西省的调查[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2023, 44(4):140-149.
[28] 任俊霖, 饶友怡, 罗欣. 长江流域居民生态补偿支付意愿及其影响因素[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(11):23-30.
[29] 国常宁, 杨建州. 基于双边界二分式CVM法的森林生物多样性生态价值评估[J]. 统计与决策, 2019, 35(24):24-28.
[30] 徐珂, 庞洁, 尹昌斌. 生态公益林补偿标准及其影响因素:基于农户受偿意愿视角[J]. 中国土地科学, 2022, 36(6):76-87.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉