Forest and Grassland Resources Research >
Ecological function zoning of Kuye River Basin based on sub-basin scale
Received date: 2024-11-08
Revised date: 2025-02-05
Online published: 2025-08-06
The experiment was conducted to clarify the ecological function zones of the Kuye River basin,analyze potential ecological and environmental issues within the area,which would provide a scientific basis for the industrial layout,ecological environment protection,and construction planning of the basin. The sub-basin division of the Kuye River was conducted with the catchment area threshold (the minimum catchment area required for river formation). By using GS+ software and ArcGIS software to overlay data layers,spatial autocorrelation analysis was conducted on elevation,precipitation,and river network density data to determine the dominant factors of primary ecological function zones,and combine them with sub-watershed boundaries to delineate primary ecological function zones. On this basis,we selected sub-watersheds with the same land use type,integrated ecological sensitivity and the soil erodibility factor value,and further precisely delineated the boundaries of secondary ecological function zones. The results indicate that the altitude of the Kuye River Basin gradually decreases from north to south,the average annual precipitation,river network density,and average slope gradually increase,the spatial distribution characteristics of ecological sensitivity and soil erodibility factor are low in the north and high in the south,and high in the north and low in the south,respectively. Therefore,it is divided from north to south into Zone A in the northern plateau arid area,Zone B in the central mountain catchment area,and Zone C in the southern mountain catchment area. From the primary division,12 secondary ecological function zones are delineated,including 1 protected area and 1 demonstration area,6 restoration areas,and 4 management areas. The zoning results can clarify the main ecological and environmental issues of different areas and provide reference significance for the sustainable development of the basin.
Yang WANG , Fucang QIN , Yufan WANG , Xiaoyu DONG , Yan LI , Yihan WU . Ecological function zoning of Kuye River Basin based on sub-basin scale[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2025 , 0(1) : 58 -66 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2025.01.007
| [1] | 欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究[J]. 生态学报, 2000(1):10-13. |
| [2] | 庄立君. 自然资源利用和生态环境保护平衡问题的研究讨论[J]. 现代农业研究, 2024, 30(3):100-102. |
| [3] | 刘木生, 林联盛, 郭秋忠. 基于GIS的生态功能分区技术方法刍议[J]. 江西农业学报, 2008(10):111-113. |
| [4] | WRIGHT R G, MURRAY M P, MERRILL T. Ecoregions as a level of ecological analysis[J]. Biological Conservation, 1998, 86(2):207-213. |
| [5] | 孟彩红, 梁冬梅, 孙大光, 等. 基于GIS的区域生态功能红线划分[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(6):263-267. |
| [6] | 资源与人居环境. 中国首部生态保护红线蓝皮书正式发布[J]. 资源与人居环境, 2023(8):6-7. |
| [7] | 许心倩. 泰安市生态功能区划研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2007. |
| [8] | 刘胤汉, 管海晏, 岳大鹏, 等. 陕西省生态环境综合分区研究[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2002(2):109-114. |
| [9] | 赵万奎, 张晓庆, 陈智平, 等. 基于GIS的金昌市生态功能区划分及发展对策[J]. 草业科学, 2019, 36(11):2989-2996. |
| [10] | 杨伟州, 邱硕, 付喜厅, 等. 河北省生态功能区划研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2016, 23(4):269-276. |
| [11] | 赵斌. 流域是生态学研究的最佳自然分割单元[J]. 科技导报, 2014, 32(1):12. |
| [12] | 高海燕, 王鑫, 杨振奇, 等. 黄河中游窟野河流域土壤侵蚀与生态修复研究进展[J]. 内蒙古大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 55(3):329-336. |
| [13] | 毕早莹, 李艳忠, 林依雪, 等. 基于Budyko理论定量分析窟野河流域植被变化对径流的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(8):61-71. |
| [14] | 圆圆, 盛艳, 刘林甫, 等. 窟野河流域生境质量时空演变特征及其影响机制研究[J]. 林草资源研究, 2023(6):67-74. |
| [15] | 刘永刚. 窟野河流域煤炭开采对水资源影响分区研究[J]. 地下水, 2022, 44(4):72-75. |
| [16] | 张东, 曹莹, 赵志琦, 等. 煤矿开采活动对黄河中游窟野河流域溶解性硫酸盐的影响[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2023, 45(2):414-426. |
| [17] | 郝芳华, 张雪松, 程红光, 等. 分布式水文模型亚流域合理划分水平刍议[J]. 水土保持学报, 2003(4):75-78. |
| [18] | 宋友城, 田毅, 安拴霞. 大清河流域生态功能区划研究[J]. 生态科学, 2021, 40(6):197-206. |
| [19] | 孙然好, 汲玉河, 尚林源, 等. 海河流域水生态功能一级二级分区[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(2):509-516. |
| [20] | 方源. 北京市水生态功能区划及分级管控策略研究[D]. 武汉: 湖北大学, 2022. |
| [21] | 许东旺. 基于GIS空间分析的朝阳市龙源湖城市湿地公园生态功能区划研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2023. |
| [22] | 国家环境保护总局. 生态功能区暂行规程[S]. 北京: 国家环境保护总局, 2002. |
| [23] | 许月卿, 赵菲菲, 孙丕苓. 基于GIS的张家口市土地生态功能分区与调控研究[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2015, 31(12):1480-1483. |
| [24] | 陈万基, 赵阳, 崔东, 等. GIS支持下绿洲生态敏感性研究:以伊犁河谷为例[J]. 测绘通报, 2023(5):107-114. |
| [25] | 孙苑苑, 王琳, 王晋. 黄河三角洲自然保护区生态敏感性评价[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 47(11):96-102. |
| [26] | 赵迅, 徐艳芳, 王浩天, 等. 基于GIS的黔西市生态敏感性评价与分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2023, 51(19):64-68. |
| [27] | 朱启明, 刘俊娥, 周正朝. 黄土高原土壤可蚀性因子空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(6):50-56. |
| [28] | 岑奕, 丁文峰, 张平仓. 华中地区土壤可蚀性因子研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2011, 28(10):65-68. |
| [29] | 王曙平. 生态环境治理视角下的城市更新与持续变革[J]. 施工企业管理, 2024(7):49-51. |
| [30] | 杨丹荔, 李益彬, 李雪梅, 等. 中国七大流域水资源供需平衡及其可持续性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024, 44(6):269-277. |
| [31] | 唐光清. 废弃矿山植被恢复的策略与效果评价[J]. 世界有色金属, 2024(15):124-126. |
| [32] | 阿古达木, 其力莫格. “碳达峰、碳中和”背景下内蒙古畜牧业减碳增效路径分析[J]. 当代畜禽养殖业, 2024, 44(3):47-49. |
| [33] | 恩和, 阿拉坦格日乐, 雅日桂. 生态保护视角下内蒙古草原畜牧业分区经营研究[J]. 大连民族大学学报, 2023, 25(4):330-336. |
| [34] | 胡继峰, 齐建飞, 鲁艳春. 特大地震、泥石流抢险救援技术研究与应用[J]. 人民黄河, 2024, 46(S2):130-131. |
| [35] | 陈宁生, 刘美, 刘丽红. 关于山洪与泥石流灾害及其流域性质判别的讨论[J]. 灾害学, 2018, 33(1):39-43. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |