欢迎访问林草资源研究
Technical Application

Analysis of the coupling coordination and driving effects of soil erosion and rocky desertification in the karst area of Lichuan City

  • Zhijie SUN ,
  • Xiping HU ,
  • Boxuan HE ,
  • Xianliang ZHANG ,
  • Yuanyao SHAO ,
  • Yuan LIAO ,
  • Linshan SUN
Expand
  • 1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Resources and Eco-Environment Geology,Wuhan 430034,China
    2. Geological Environmental Center of Hubei Province,Wuhan 430034,China
    3. Taizi Mountain Forest Farm Administration of Hubei Province,Jingshan 431822,Hubei,China
    4. Chengdu Geological Survey Center,China Geological Survey,Chengdu 610218,China

Received date: 2025-01-10

  Revised date: 2025-02-10

  Online published: 2025-08-06

Abstract

Investigating the spatial distribution characteristics,correlation,and driving factors of soil erosion and rocky desertification is of significant decision-making and practical value for the ecological protection and restoration of karst areas. With Lichuan City,Hubei Province as the research object,by using the RUSLE model,rocky desertification index,spatial autocorrelation analysis,and coupling coordination model,the spatial distribution patterns and coupling coordination relationships of soil erosion and rocky desertification were analyzed. The driving factors are detected using the GeoDetector. The results show that soil erosion in the karst area of Lichuan City is mainly characterized by moderate and lower levels,hot spots are mainly concentrated in parts of the central,western and southern regions. Rocky desertification is predominantly at the moderate level,and the hot spots are widely distributed throughout the area. The degree of rocky desertification is most severe in areas with intense soil erosion,and the degree of soil erosion is most severe in areas with severe rocky desertification. Both soil erosion and rocky desertification exhibit significant positive spatial autocorrelation,and there is a weak bivariate positive spatial correlation between them. Soil erosion and rocky desertification are generally in a state of high coupling but low coordination,characterized by mutual constraints at a low level. The dominant factor for soil erosion is vegetation cover,while the dominant factor for rocky desertification is rock exposure rate,with their interactions having a certain spatial overlap effect.

Cite this article

Zhijie SUN , Xiping HU , Boxuan HE , Xianliang ZHANG , Yuanyao SHAO , Yuan LIAO , Linshan SUN . Analysis of the coupling coordination and driving effects of soil erosion and rocky desertification in the karst area of Lichuan City[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2025 , 0(1) : 126 -136 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2025.01.014

References

[1] 白晓永, 冉晨, 陈敬安, 等. 中国喀斯特生态系统健康诊断的方法、进展与展望[J]. 科学通报, 2023(19):2550-2568.
[2] 熊康宁, 池永宽. 中国南方喀斯特生态系统面临的问题及对策[J]. 生态经济, 2015, 31(1):23-30.
[3] 龙蓉华, 孙虎, 徐崟尧. 黔西南石漠化生态脆弱区水土流失敏感性评价[J]. 生态科学, 2021, 40(6):133-139.
[4] 袁道先. 我国西南岩溶石山的环境地质问题[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 1997, 19(5):41-43.
[5] 张琦, 蔡雄飞, 汪发勇, 等. 喀斯特石漠化与水土流失强度耦合关系分析:以六盘水市为例[J]. 亚热带水土保持, 2016, 28(3):7-11.
[6] 熊康宁, 李晋, 龙明忠. 典型喀斯特石漠化治理区水土流失特征与关键问题[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(7):878-888.
[7] 曹建华, 蒋忠诚, 杨德生, 等. 贵州省岩溶区水土流失、石漠化受岩溶环境制约[J]. 中国水土保持, 2009(1):20-23.
[8] 尹辉, 蒋忠诚, 罗为群, 等. 西南岩溶区水土流失与石漠化动态评价研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2011, 18(1):66-70.
[9] 刘发勇, 熊康宁, 兰安军, 等. 贵州省喀斯特石漠化与水土流失空间相关分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2015, 22(6):60-64.
[10] 罗旭玲, 白晓永, 谭秋, 等. 不同岩性背景下土壤侵蚀与石漠化关联性分析[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(24):8717-8725.
[11] 陈金珂, 蒲俊兵, 李建鸿, 等. 典型岩溶流域不同坡度等级下的土壤侵蚀与石漠化分布特征耦合分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(5):1-9.
[12] 何茂林, 张玉珊, 高家勇, 等. 喀斯特区土壤侵蚀与石漠化协同演变及交互关系[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(1):140-150.
[13] WANG Huan, GAO Jiangbo, HOU Wenjuan. Quantitative attribution analysis of soil erosion in different geomorphological types in karst areas:Based on the geodetector method[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29(2):271-286.
[14] 孙智杰, 王艺霖, 梁川, 等. 基于RUSLE模型的利川市水土流失敏感性时空特征分析[J]. 资源环境与工程, 2024, 38(5):586-593.
[15] 水利部水土保持司. 岩溶地区水土流失综合治理技术标准:SL 461-2009[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国水利部, 2009.
[16] 水利部水土保持司. 生产建设项目土壤流失量测算导则:SL 773-2018[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国水利部, 2018.
[17] WILLAMS J R, JONES C A, KINIRY J R, et al. The EPIC crop growth model[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1989, 32(2):497-511.
[18] MCCOOL D K, BROWN L C, FOSTER G R, et al. Revised slope steepnessfactor for the universal soil loss equation[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1987, 30(5):1387-1396.
[19] 蔡崇法, 丁树文, 史志华, 等. 应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2000(2):19-24.
[20] 杨严攀, 田培, 沈晨竹, 等. 基于RUSLE模型和地理探测器的鄂西南土壤侵蚀脆弱性评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024, 38(1):91-103.
[21] 李阳兵, 王世杰, 程安云, 等. 基于网格单元的喀斯特石漠化评价研究[J]. 地理科学, 2010, 30(1):98-102.
[22] 钱慧, 张超, 范金明, 等. 基于改进CASA模型的云南省植被NPP时空格局分析[J]. 林草资源研究, 2023(6):120-128.
[23] 李林蓓, 李剑泉, 郭慧敏. 中国木材市场时空格局分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2022(1):78-85.
[24] 王伯阳. 基于LUCC的生态系统服务价值与碳排放时空演变研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2021.
[25] 何鑫, 钟九生, 林双双, 等. 西南喀斯特地区耕地破碎化与石漠化空间格局及耦合关系研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(6):160-170.
[26] 朱鹏飞, 白慧, 吴秀芹, 等. 广西石漠化与城镇化耦合协调的时空异质性[J]. 中国水土保持科学(中英文), 2024, 22(3):154-161.
[27] 王政, 杨霞. 森林康养空间分布特征及其影响因素研究:以四川森林康养基地为例[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020(2):146-153.
[28] 李瑞, 盘礼东. 岩石裸露与水土流失关系研究现状及石漠化因子研究存在的问题[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(5):10-15.
[29] 涂怡, 陈虎, 尹雯, 等. 湖北省清江流域土壤侵蚀时空变化及影响因子研究[J]. 湖北民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 42(4):593-600.
Outlines

/