欢迎访问林草资源研究

Forest and Grassland Resources Research >

2024 , Vol. 0 >Issue 5: 106 - 115

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2024.05.012

Scientific Research

Soil Physicochemical Properties and Plant Diversity Characteristics of Cupressus funebris with Different Stand Ages in Limestone Mountain Areas

  • Yuhao YANG ,
  • Lingling WANG ,
  • Yong ZHANG ,
  • Quanzhi ZHANG ,
  • Hanjing SUN ,
  • Wenpeng WANG ,
  • Benzhi ZHOU ,
  • Zeng WANG
Expand
  • 1. Northeast Forestry University,Harbin 150000,China
    2. Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Hangzhou 311400,China
    3. Forestry and Water Conservancy Bureau of Fuyang District,Hangzhou,Hangzhou 311400,China
    4. Zhejiang Provincial Public Welfare Forest and State owned Forest Farm Management Station,Hangzhou 310009,China
    5. Hangzhou Fuyang District Agricultural Technology Extension Center,Hangzho 311400,China

Received date: 2024-05-06

  Revised date: 2024-09-26

  Online published: 2025-04-18

Fold

Abstract

The investigation of the impact of Cupressus funebris forests of varying ages on soil physicochemical properties and plant diversity in limestone mountainous regions is of paramount importance for vegetation restoration in fragile ecosystems within rocky desertification zones.Focusing on Cupressus funebris forests in the limestone mountainous areas of Fuyang District,Hangzhou City,Zhejiang Province,China,this study categorized the forests into control(limestone non-stocked land),young forests,middle-aged forests,and near-mature forests.Employing the space-for-time substitution method,along with Pearson correlation analysis and Redundancy Analysis(RDA),the study explored the influence of Cupressus funebris forests of different ages on soil physicochemical properties and plant diversity in limestone mountainous regions.1)The soil bulk density of Cupressus funebris forests of all ages was lower than that of non-stocked land,whereas the maximum water-holding capacity,capillary water-holding capacity,minimum water-holding capacity,and moisture content of the soil,were higher.Among them,middle-aged forests had the lowest soil bulk density and the highest water-holding capacity,while young forests had the highest moisture content.2)The soil organic carbon,total nitrogen,and hydrolyzable nitrogen contents of Cupressus funebris forests of different ages were higher than those of non-stocked land,with middle-aged forests exhibiting the highest contents.3)The species richness of Cupressus funebris forests of all ages was higher than that of non-stocked land.Middle-aged forests exhibited the greatest species richness in both tree and herb layers,whereas young forests showed the greatest richness in the shrub layer.The Simpson dominance index of Cupressus funebris forests of all ages was higher than that of non-stocked land,and the Shannon-Wiener diversity index of young and middle-aged forests was significantly higher than that of non-stocked land.4)Correlation analysis and RDA indicated that pH was the primary factor influencing soil physicochemical properties and plant diversity in the region,followed by water-holding capacity,bulk density,moisture content,total phosphorus,and hydrolyzable nitrogen.In summary,the soil physicochemical properties and plant diversity of Cupressus funebris forests in limestone mountainous regions were significantly superior to those of non-stocked land,with middle-aged forests demonstrating the best overall performance.Cupressus funebris had a significant effect on improving soil in limestone mountainous regions,with effects varying by forest age.

Key words： Cupressus funebris forest; different forest ages; soil nutrients; plant diversity; soil physicochemical properties

Cite this article

Yuhao YANG , Lingling WANG , Yong ZHANG , Quanzhi ZHANG , Hanjing SUN , Wenpeng WANG , Benzhi ZHOU , Zeng WANG . Soil Physicochemical Properties and Plant Diversity Characteristics of Cupressus funebris with Different Stand Ages in Limestone Mountain Areas[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024 , 0(5) : 106 -115 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2024.05.012

References

[1] 邓伟. 茂兰喀斯特森林地上生物量分布特征及驱动因素[D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2023.
[2] KARDOL P, BEZEMER T M, VAN DER PUTTEN W H. Temporal variation in plant-soil feedback controls succession[J]. Ecology Letters, 2006, 9(9):1080-1088.
[3] 邵水仙, 董智, 李红丽, 等. 不同造林模式对退化石灰岩山地土壤理化性质及水文效应的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(1):263-267.
[4] 周璟, 张旭东, 周金星, 等. 我国植被恢复对土壤质量的影响研究综述[J]. 世界林业研究, 2009, 22(2):56-61.
[5] 王懿君. 石灰岩山地人工造林和封山育林促进阔叶树天然更新技术[J]. 安徽林业科技, 2020, 46(5):23-25.
[6] 姜沛沛, 曹扬, 陈云明, 等. 不同林龄油松(Pinus tabulaeformis)人工林植物、凋落物与土壤C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(19):6188-6197.
[7] 林大仪. 土壤学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2004.
[8] 马克平, 刘玉明. 生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅰα多样性的测度方法(下)[J]. 生物多样性, 1994(4):231-239.
[9] MANEA A, LEISHMAN M R. Soil water content variability drives productivity responses of a model grassland system to extreme rainfall events under elevated[J]. Plant Ecology, 2018, 219(12):1413-1421.
[10] 李红琴, 吴夏璐, 张法伟, 等. 高寒草甸冬季牧场土壤持水能力对草地封育的响应[J]. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(8):1-8.
[11] 李瑶, 刘冬冬, 车陆禄. 喀斯特山地森林土壤入渗特征对人为踩踏的响应规律[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(4):96-105.
[12] 程欢, 付雨欣, 董洪君, 等. 川中丘陵区不同植被类型土壤理化性质及水文效应[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019, 25(4):845-853.
[13] 崔宁洁, 张丹桔, 刘洋, 等. 不同林龄马尾松人工林林下植物多样性与土壤理化性质[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(10):2610-2617.
[14] 杨志训, 秦连岗. 不同林龄马尾松人工林表层土壤养分特征分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2014(3):101-104.
[15] NIU Xiaoyun, SUN Xiaomei, CHEN Dongsheng, et al. Soil microorganisms,nutrients and enzyme activity of Larix kaempferi plantation under different ages in mountainous region of eastern Liaoning Province,China[J]. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(9):2663-2672.
[16] 周润惠, 唐永彬, 王敏, 等. 威远不同年龄桉树人工林林下物种多样性和土壤理化性质[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27(3):742-748.
[17] 马天舒, 丁伟林, 肖复明, 等. 不同年龄阶段陈山红心杉人工林土壤理化性质[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2020, 40(12):114-124.
[18] 盘金文, 郭其强, 孙学广, 等. 不同林龄马尾松人工林碳、氮、磷、钾养分含量及其生态化学计量特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(4):746-756.
[19] 杨伟明, 王志滨, 栾士波. 天然杨桦林营养元素归还量与密度效应[J]. 延边大学农学学报, 2002(1):1-4.
[20] 李永强, 赵萌莉, 韩国栋, 等. 不同年限草原撂荒地土壤理化特性研究[J]. 中国草地学报, 2012, 34(3):61-64.
[21] 罗明霞, 胡宗达, 刘兴良, 等. 川西亚高山不同林龄粗枝云杉人工林土壤微生物生物量及酶活性[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(14):5632-5642.
[22] 王龙凤, 肖伟伟, 王树力. 天然次生林人工管理后土壤团聚体稳定性及碳氮分布变化[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44(7):97-106.
[23] 袁媛, 张鹤, 武杼华, 等. 植被恢复对毛乌素沙地土壤pH和养分含量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(1):148-156.
[24] GAO Tian, HEDBLOM M, EMILSSON T, et al. The role of forest stand structure as biodiversity indicator[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014,330:82-93.
[25] 张绍聪, 高禾苗, 袁龙义, 等. 西藏不同林龄核桃林土壤理化性质及林下植被多样性特征[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2023, 51(7):115-122.
[26] 杨育林, 李贤伟, 王海明, 等. 抚育间伐对川中丘陵区柏木人工林生长和植物多样性的影响[J]. 山地学报, 2015, 33(2):199-207.
[27] 黎炜彬, 严朝东, 翟欣, 等. 郁闭度对马占相思人工林下植物多样性的影响[J]. 热带林业, 2021, 49(1):4-7.
[28] 康冰, 刘世荣, 蔡道雄, 等. 马尾松人工林林分密度对林下植被及土壤性质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(10):2323-2331.
[29] 王加国. 茂兰喀斯特植被恢复过程水分格局与物种多样性保护研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2017.
[30] 陈丝露, 赵敏, 李贤伟, 等. 柏木低效林不同改造模式优势草本植物多样性及其生态位[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(1):143-155.
[31] 庞世龙, 黄小荣, 欧芷阳, 等. 桂南不同植被模式公益林植物多样性与土壤因子的关系[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2015, 35(5):109-113.
[32] 赵景学, 曲广鹏, 多吉顿珠, 等. 藏北高寒植被群落物种多样性与土壤环境因子的关系[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2011, 25(6):105-108.
[33] 陆海飞, 徐建民, 李光友, 等. 尾巨桉林不同生长发育阶段的土壤理化性质与林下植物多样性的动态变化趋势及其规律[J]. 林业科学研究, 2024, 37(1):82-91.
[34] 张沛健, 徐建民, 卢万鸿, 等. 雷州半岛不同林龄尾细桉人工林植物多样性和土壤理化性质分析[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2021, 41(9):96-105.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉