欢迎访问林草资源研究
Technical Application

Carbon Content of Landscaping Tree Species in Zhengzhou City

  • Qike DING ,
  • Hao DOU ,
  • Ershan ZHANG ,
  • Chuanwei HU ,
  • Jing HE
Expand
  • 1. College of Forestry,Henan Agricultural University,Zhengzhou 450002,China
    2. Palm Eco-Town Development Co,Ltd,Zhengzhou 450000,China

Received date: 2023-12-15

  Revised date: 2024-02-22

  Online published: 2024-03-22

Abstract

This study explores the carbon content characteristics of various organs of landscaping tree species in Zhengzhou city.It provides a basis for selecting and formulating policy on landscaping tree species with carbon sequestration value in Zhengzhou city.The carbon content of five organs,including trunk,branches,leaves,bark,and roots,was measured using the potassium dichromate external heating method for 14 landscaping tree species,including Platanus orientalis L.,Populus L.,Michelia alba DC.,Ginkgo biloba L.,Prunus cerasifera 'Atropurpurea',Prunus serrulata var.lannesiana(Carri.)Makino.,Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge,Prunus davidiana (Carrière)Franch.,Osmanthus fragrnas(Thunb.)Lour.,Ligustrum lucidum Ait.,Magnolia grandiflora L.,Cedrus deodara(Roxb.)G.Don,Eriobotrya japonica(Thunb.)Lindl.,hotinia serratifolia(Desf.)Kalkman.The results show that:1)The variation range of carbon content in different organs among 14 tree species is 25.88% to 59.15%.2)For the same tree species(taking the example of the Platanus orientalis L.),the coefficient of variation between barious organs is 7.41% to 9.36%,and the coefficient of variation between the same organs is 0.16% to 2.54%.3)For different tree species,the coefficient of variation between the same organs is 10.44% to 19.30%,and the coefficient of variation between different organs is 4.73% to 22.54%; The overall average carbon content of variaus organ is as follows:trunk>branches>bark>leaves>roots,and the carbon content of the trunk is significantly higher than others.

Cite this article

Qike DING , Hao DOU , Ershan ZHANG , Chuanwei HU , Jing HE . Carbon Content of Landscaping Tree Species in Zhengzhou City[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024 , 0(1) : 95 -101 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2024.01.013

References

[1] 唐佳, 方江平. 森林生态系统服务功能价值评估指标体系研究[J]. 西藏科技, 2010(3):71-75.
[2] 杨同辉, 夏晨诚, 曹菁. 浙江天童主要树种含碳率分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(33):390-392.
[3] Reay S D. Climate change for the masses[J]. Nature:International Weekly Journal of Science, 2008, 452(7183):31-31.
[4] 李康杰, 胡中岳, 刘萍, 等. 广东省珠三角乔木林生物量碳储量评估[J]. 林业资源管理, 2022(4):54-60.
[5] 张峰, 彭祚登. 北京市森林碳储量和碳汇经济价值研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2021(6):52-58.
[6] 吕浩, 彭春良, 吴惠俐, 等. 森林生态系统不同碳库碳储量估算方法综述[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2022, 49(6):90-98.
[7] 付玉杰, 田地, 侯正阳, 等. 全球森林碳汇功能评估研究进展[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44(10):1-10.
[8] Gao Bilei, Taylor R A, Chen Han, et al. Variation in total and volatile carbon concentration among the major tree species of the boreal forest[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016, 375:191-199.
[9] 李凯锋, 罗于洋, 王树森, 等. 科尔沁大青沟3种群落乔木层优势树种含碳率分布特征的研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2013(4):47-52.
[10] Martin R A, Gezahegn S, Thomas C S. Variation in carbon and nitrogen concentration among major woody tissue types in temperate trees[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2015, 45(6):744-757.
[11] 刘维, 张晓丽, 马菁. 鹫峰国家森林公园主要乔木树种含碳率分析[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2011, 26(5):214-218.
[12] 章理运, 段传宏, 李月凤. 信阳市城镇园林绿化树种的选择与应用[J]. 信阳农业高等专科学校学报, 2003(4):14-16.
[13] 徐昉, 李明慧, 施以, 等. 基于双碳目标的园林植物景观营建策略研究——以北京市海淀公园为例[J]. 园林, 2023, 40(1):34-41.
[14] 郭群, 李运中, 苗伟, 等. 许昌市城镇园林绿化植物配置选择研究[J]. 绿色科技, 2019,(19):59-61.
[15] 王敏, 石乔莎. 城市绿色碳汇效能影响因素及优化研究[J]. 中国城市林业, 2015, 13(4):1-5.
[16] 马俊青, 李高阳, 田丽. 河南省主要造林树种含碳率比较研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2012, 41(9):131-132.
[17] 白保勋, 焦书道, 陈东海. 河南中北部38个常见树种的生物量与固碳特征分析[J]. 西部林业科学, 2017, 46(1):79-84.
[18] 张栋, 刘桂华. 郑州市树木园植物群落景观综合评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2023, 43(10):178-186.
[19] 杨希博. 河南郑州园林植物系属组成及植物景观评价[J]. 分子植物育种, 2023, 21(16):5533-5538.
[20] 陈菲. 郑州东区小游园园林植物配置调查研究[J]. 河南农业, 2023(06):51-52.
[21] 邢建丽, 郭凌, 闫丽君, 等. 郑州市园林地被植物物种多样性研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2017, 51(2):237-242.
[22] 双龙, 妮萨娜, 杜江, 等. 重铬酸钾氧化-外加热法测定化探土壤样品中有机碳含量[J]. 安徽化工, 2016, 42(4):110-112.
[23] 徐期瑚, 林丽平, 薛春泉, 等. 广东樟树各器官含碳率及碳储量[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2019, 36(1):70-79.
[24] 陆龙龙, 袁靓, 范春楠, 等. 长白山林区主要树种含碳率及其差异分析[J]. 北华大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 19(2):164-169.
[25] 焦秀梅, 项文化, 田大伦. 湖南省森林植被的碳贮量及其地理分布规律[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2005(1):4-8.
[26] 田大伦, 王新凯, 方晰, 等. 喀斯特地区不同植被恢复模式幼林生态系统碳储量及其空间分布[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(9):7-14.
[27] 王春梅, 邵彬, 王汝南. 东北地区两种主要造林树种生态系统固碳潜力[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(7):1764-1772.
Outlines

/