Forest and Grassland Resources Research >
Effects of Different Crown Density of Hevea brasiliensis Plantations on the Growth Characteristics of Aquilaria sinensis Saplings under Interplanting
Received date: 2023-11-22
Revised date: 2024-02-18
Online published: 2024-03-22
In order to explore and screen out Hevea brasiliensis(Willd.ex A.Juss.)Muell.Arg stand suitable for intercropping of Aquilaria sinensis(Lour.)Spreng.Aquilaria sinensis saplings were interplanted in three different crown densities(0~0.1,0.2~0.3,0.7~0.8,respectively)Hevea brasiliensis plantations.The morphological indexes,total biomass dry weight,physiological and biochemical indexes of Aquilaria sinensis saplings in the experimental plantations were determined.Principal component analysis was used to analyze the response information of each index of Aquilaria sinensis saplings to Hevea brasiliensis forests with different crown densities.The Hevea brasiliensis forests suitable for the growth of Aquilaria sinensis saplings were selected by comparison.Results show :1)The Hevea brasiliensis plantation with a crown density of 0.2~0.3 had the highest growth rate of morphological indexes,the highest dry weight of total biomass,the total chlorophyll content,soluble protein content and catalase activity of Aquilaria sinensis saplings,which were significantly higher than those of the other two Hevea brasiliensis plantations.The malondialdehyde content was low,and the soluble sugar content and superoxide dismutase activity were not significantly different from those of the other two Hevea brasiliensis plantations.2)In Hevea brasiliensis plantations with a crown density of 0.7~0.8,the growth of Aquilaria sinensis saplings was the worst,and the total biomass dry weight was the lowest.3 )The growth of Aquilaria sinensis saplings was moderate in Hevea brasiliensis forest with a crown density of 0~0.1.4)Principal component analysis showed that the comprehensive score of each index of Aquilaria sinensis saplings interplanted in Hevea brasiliensis plantations with a crown density of 0.2~0.3 was the highest.Therefore,the 3-year-old Hevea brasiliensis plantationswith a crown density of 0.2~0.3 was more suitable for mixed intercropping of Aquilaria sinensis saplings.
Fanglan ZHANG , Shaozhong WU , Jianhui XU , Linhua SHA , Zhaojia LI , Fazhi FANG . Effects of Different Crown Density of Hevea brasiliensis Plantations on the Growth Characteristics of Aquilaria sinensis Saplings under Interplanting[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024 , 0(1) : 143 -150 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2024.01.018
| [1] | 张丽娜. 不同立地条件对红豆杉幼苗生长的影响[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2023, 26(7):65-67. |
| [2] | 廖银珍. 不同林分套种对阳春砂仁生长和挥发油成分的影响[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2022. |
| [3] | 殷正, 范秀华. 长白山不同演替阶段温带森林林下草本植物对乔木幼苗的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(7):2194-2204. |
| [4] | 曹建国, 赵则海, 王文杰, 等. 天然次生林三种不同生境刺五加丁香苷和总黄酮含量的研究[J]. 植物研究, 2005,(2):205-209. |
| [5] | 李萌, 陈永康, 徐浩成, 等. 不同间伐强度对南亚热带杉木人工林林下植物功能群的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(14):4985-4993. |
| [6] | 戴兴福. 林分类型和郁闭度对林下套种七叶一枝花的影响[J]. 林业勘察设计, 2021(4):56-58. |
| [7] | 魏荣富. 马尾松采伐基地培育杉木林分套种茯苓效果研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2014, 20(16):79-80. |
| [8] | 吴琳, 彭黎旭, 刘贝贝, 等. 5个淮山新品种在海南幼龄橡胶林下的间作表现[J]. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(2):209-214. |
| [9] | 黄莹. 澳洲坚果林下套种中药材鸡骨草栽培技术[J]. 现代园艺, 2023, 46(6):54-55. |
| [10] | 曾淑燕, 邓春亮, 张冬生, 等. 油茶林下套种不同中药材的综合效益评价[J]. 福建林业科技, 2023, 50(1):44-52. |
| [11] | 俞初庸. 杉木林下套种对南方红豆杉、闽楠早期生长性状的影响[J]. 南方农业, 2022, 16(14):23-25. |
| [12] | 杨浪, 李瑜. 桉树相思混交林郁闭度和立地类型对其林下套种土沉香幼树生长的影响[J]. 防护林科技, 2023,(4):55-57,71. |
| [13] | 邹燕, 耿广东, 王一. 花椒林下套种南瓜高效种植关键技术[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2023, 29(8):55-57. |
| [14] | 刘源, 王民乐, 崔湛秋, 等. 糖槭林下黑木耳立体栽培技术[J]. 中国食用菌, 2023, 42(2):117-120. |
| [15] | 程汉亭, 李勤奋, 刘景坤, 等. 橡胶林下益智光合特性的季节动态变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(5):585-594. |
| [16] | 庞圣江, 张培, 杨保国, 等. 林隙大小对土沉香人工更新幼树生长发育的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(4):83-88. |
| [17] | 王海军, 孙延军, 韩启斌, 等. 华南区域土沉香规模化栽培技术[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2016, 35(1):67-69. |
| [18] | 袁媛, 孟磊, 庞玉新, 等. 3种南药-橡胶立体复合种植模式对胶林土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(30):91-96. |
| [19] | 陶建祥, 吕厚波, 周文会, 等. 天然橡胶+白芨种植模式探索[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018,(17):138-139. |
| [20] | 侯跃, 张晓群. 咖啡-橡胶及澳洲坚果立体套种模式探讨[J]. 中国热带农业, 2010(6):50-53. |
| [21] | 祖超, 邬华松, 谭乐和, 等. 橡胶与胡椒复合种植模式分析[J]. 热带农业科学, 2011, 31(12):26-32. |
| [22] | 王学奎. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006:278-279. |
| [23] | 战丽杰, 张宏宝, 李宗泰, 等. 遮荫处理对芍药幼苗生长和矿质营养积累的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(10):3473-3479. |
| [24] | 令狐克念, 袁丛军, 王浩东, 等. 马尾松林分郁闭度及种植材料对茯苓菌核产量的影响[J]. 西部林业科学, 2023, 52(3):95-100. |
| [25] | 杨礼旦. 不同地类造林对闽楠幼林的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(7):115-117. |
| [26] | 苑淑媛, 张鹏, 沈海龙. 天然更新红松苗针叶光合和解剖特性对不同郁闭环境的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9):2314-2320. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |