Forest and Grassland Resources Research >
Study on Establishment of Technical System for Management and Assessment of the Conservation Easement in the National Park
Received date: 2023-06-19
Revised date: 2023-07-20
Online published: 2023-10-16
It is very common that state-owned land and collective land coexist in natural protected areas,and it is also true for national park.This is a great challenge to balance the relationship between interests of community residents and natural conservation with high quality for national park.The easement system for natural protected areas abroad has been implemented for many years.Based on the experience summary and refinement for conservation easement operation in Qianjiangyuan National Park construction area,this study first presents technical systems for management and assessment about conservation easement.The management system includes:management process,program preparation,investigation and verification,publicity,formation of servitude land authorization documents,contract signing,and management system construction.The assessment system includes:assessment object,contentand type,process,data acquisition,assessment of contract performance,collective forest land and rural contracted land resource assets and ecological benefit assesment.The two systems provide practical rules for the realization of unified protection and management of natural resource assets in national parks dominated by collective land,which is typical and exemplary for the high-quality construction of a system of natural protected areas with national parks as the main body and the promotion of innovation in the management system.
Tuchun ZOU , Xiaoyou SONG , Shujun JIANG , Qi XU , Kezhuang WU , Yiming XU , Xiaoping TANG , Shu WANG . Study on Establishment of Technical System for Management and Assessment of the Conservation Easement in the National Park[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2023 , 0(4) : 18 -26 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2023.04.003
| [1] | 中共中央办公厅, 国务院办公厅. 建立国家公园体制总体方案[EB/OL].(2017-09-26)[2023-06-26]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2017-09/26/content_5227713.htm. |
| [2] | 张宁, 余露. 美国保护地役权实践经验及启示[J]. 世界农业, 2023(1):57-65. |
| [3] | 王宇飞. 美国保护地役权的经验和借鉴[J]. 中国国土资源经济, 2023(10):52-59. |
| [4] | 张迪, 颜国强. 美国农业保护地役权购买计划概述及对我国的借鉴[J]. 国土资源情报, 2004(8):7-12. |
| [5] | 沈海虹. 美国文化遗产保护领域中的地役权制度[J]. 中外建筑, 2006(2):52-54. |
| [6] | 张潜伟. 美国的农业保护地役权对我国土地管理制度改革的启示[J]. 决策探索, 2017(14):87. |
| [7] | 唐孝辉. 建设美丽中国的法律制度回应——自然资源保护地役权制度的构建[J]. 理论与现代化, 2013(4):12-16. |
| [8] | 苏杨. 保护地可以靠地役权来建设“山水林田湖草人”生命共同体——解读《建立国家公园体制总体方案》之七[J]. 中国发展观察, 2019(3):88-93. |
| [9] | 魏钰, 何思源, 雷光春, 等. 保护地役权对中国国家公园统一管理的启示——基于美国经验[J]. 北京林业大学学报:社会科学版, 2019(1):70-79. |
| [10] | 葛芳芳. 我国国家公园保护地役权探究[J]. 创造, 2020(12):70-74. |
| [11] | 陈君帜, 唐小平. 中国国家公园保护制度体系构建研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报:社会科学版, 2020, 19(1):1-11. |
| [12] | 陈薇. 老河沟:自然保护区的“改革开放”[J/OL]. 中国新闻周刊, 2013(9). [2023-06-26]https://wenku.so.com/d/28038e87069428202758561aa1034454. |
| [13] | 宋小友, 廖志明. 开化:创新“保护地役权”登记工作[J]. 中国土地, 2021(2):49-50. |
| [14] | 申小莉, 李晟, 马克平. 钱江源—百山祖国家公园试点经验与发展方向[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(3):315-318. |
| [15] | 汤以胜, 黄兴, 汤璟浩. 集体林地设立地役权调查登记探索与研究[J]. 浙江国土资源, 2021(12):41-43. |
| [16] | 武夷山国家公园管理局关于开展毛竹林地役权管理摸底工作的通知[EB/OL].(2020-07-28)[2023-07-26]. http://wysgjgy.fujian.gov.cn/zwgk/zxwj/202007/t20200730_5512646.htm. |
| [17] | 江山雪岭社会公益型自然保护地签订地役权合同[EB/OL].(2020-12-29)[2023-07-27]. http://lyj.zj.gov.cn/art/2021/1/7/art_1285511_59002759.html. |
| [18] | “权利更多,补偿不减”南山国家公园推行集体林地地役权[EB/OL].(2022-09-20)[2023-07-26]. http://hunan.ifeng.com/c/8JSmKMdCxHM. |
| [19] | 彭后生, 李晨晨, 石峤瑀. 林木资源分类估价及其基准价研究——以浙江省龙泉市为例[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020(6):61-65. |
| [20] | 王宏伟, 霍振彬, 赵建平. 对《森林资源资产评估技术规范》中若干问题的探讨[J]. 林业资源管理, 2009(1):31-34. |
| [21] | 王宏伟, 侯元兆, 霍振斌. 对中国森林资源评估相关概念的探讨[J]. 林业资源管理, 2015(1):17-22. |
| [22] | TD/T1061—2021,自然资源价格评估通则[S]. |
| [23] | GB/T 50291—2015,房地产估价规范[S]. |
| [24] | GB/T 28406—2012,农用地估价规程[S]. |
| [25] | GB/T 39739—2020,国家公园考核评价规范[S]. |
| [26] | 罗姮, 李林林, 叶艳妹. 国内保护地役权研究评述:内涵阐释,作用机理与实践初探[J]. 中国土地科学, 2023(1):124-132. |
| [27] | 颜志君. 保护地役权在国家公园体制建设中的适用途径[J]. 黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报, 23(4):93-96. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |