欢迎访问林草资源研究
Scientific Research

Effects of Different Tending Methods on Tree Growth and Soil Nutrients in Secondary Birch Forest

  • Hui WANG ,
  • Aitao CHEN ,
  • Li XU
Expand
  • Hebei Mulan Weichang State-owned Forest Farm,Weichang,Hebei 068450,China

Received date: 2022-08-31

  Revised date: 2022-10-24

  Online published: 2023-04-21

Abstract

This paper analyzed the effects of different tending methods on the tree growth and soil physicochemical properties in birch forest,based on a research conducted in a birch forest of Hebei Mulan Weichang State-owned Forest Farm.The results showed that:1)Effects on DBH:No significant difference between UM and CK,while the effect of quality management(QM)was significantly higher than the CK after 4 years.2)Effects on tree height:There was no significant difference on tree height growth.3)Effects on crown width:QM>UM>CK after 2 years,significantly;QM and UM both were significantly higher than the CK after 4 and 6 years,but there was no significant difference between QM and UM.4)Effects on average annual volume growth:No significant difference among QM,UM,and CK after 2 years.However,QM was significantly higher than UM and CK after 4 and 6 years.5)There was no significant difference of effect on PH value in 0~20 cm and 20~40 cm soil layers.6)In the 0~20 cm soil layer,the content of organic matter,alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen,available phosphorus,and available potassium were all QM>UM>CK,with significant differences.In the 20~40 cm soil layer,there was no difference in the content of available potassium;the content of alkali hydrolyzed nitrogen was QM>UM>CK,with significant differences;effective phosphorus content was CK>UM>QM,with significant differences;the organic matter content of QM was significantly higher than that of UM and CK,but there was no difference between UM and CK.

Cite this article

Hui WANG , Aitao CHEN , Li XU . Effects of Different Tending Methods on Tree Growth and Soil Nutrients in Secondary Birch Forest[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2022 , 0(zk1) : 85 -90 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2022.S0.013

References

[1] 凌继华, 王丽, 张鸿景. 木兰林管局白桦次生林经营的建议[J]. 河北林业科技, 2010(3):57.
[2] 李久贵, 孟宪友. 次生林的经营管理[J]. 林业勘查设计, 2005(2):43.
[3] 朱教君. 次生林经营基础研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(12):1689-1694.
[4] 刘忠君, 郑秀梅. 次生林的特点分析[J]. 林业勘查设计, 2005(4):19-20.
[5] 张水松, 林光, 陈长发, 等. 次生常绿阔叶林抚育改造技术的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 1997(5):57-64.
[6] 管惠文, 董希斌, 张甜, 等. 抚育间伐后落叶松天然次生林生境恢复效果的评价[J]. 东北林业大学报, 2019, 47(7):6-13.
[7] 胡雪凡, 张会儒, 周超凡, 等. 不同抚育间伐方式对蒙古栎次生林空间结构的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(5):137-147.
[8] 王智勇, 董希斌, 张甜, 等. 抚育间伐强度对落叶松天然次生林林分结构及健康的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2018, 46(11):1-7.
[9] 路兴慧, 臧润国, 丁易, 等. 抚育措施对热带次生林群落植物功能性状和功能多样性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2015, 23(1):79-88.
[10] 刘忠玲, 姚颖, 刘建明, 等. 抚育间伐对白桦天然次生林枯落物与土壤持水特性的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2020, 36(4):29-37.
[11] Jactel H, Gritti E S, Dr?ssler L, et al. Positive biodiversity-productivity relationships in forests:Climate matters[J]. Biology Letters, 2018, 14(4):20170747.
[12] Zhang Y, Chen H Y H, Reich P B. Forest productivity increases with evenness,species richness and trait variation:A globalmeta-analysis[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2012, 100(3):742-749.
[13] 周志立, 张丽玮, 陈倩, 等. 木兰围场3种典型林分枯落物及土壤持水能力[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(1):207-213.
[14] 郭梦娇. 辽河源地区典型林分森林生态系统服务功能评估研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2016.
[15] 王辉, 张章, 曹运强, 等. 森林近自然流域经营关键技术[J]. 河北林业科技, 2018(4):53-55.
[16] 邬可义, 陈绍志, 徐成立, 等. 以目标树为构架的人工林全林经营与天然次生林的转化研究——河北木兰林管局森林经营新探索[J]. 林业经济, 2015, 37(1):56-61.
[17] 王艳军, 王辉, 陈爱桃. 木兰林场森林近自然经营实践[J]. 林业科技通讯, 2021(8):46-49.
[18] 李朝英, 郑路. 土壤pH测定的影响因素探讨[J]. 上海农业学报, 2021, 37(1):47-52.
[19] 张勇强, 李智超, 厚凌宇, 等. 林分密度对杉木人工林下物种多样性和土壤养分的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(1):239-250.
[20] 杨芹芹. 城市人工林土壤养分状况与微生物群落结构的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2012.
[21] 于伟斌. 白桦人工林抚育间伐试验研究[J]. 农林科技, 2014(3):21.
[22] 白育英. 大青山白桦次生林经营技术研究[J]. 干旱区资料与环境, 2000(1):90-94.
[23] Bell T H, Klironomos J N, Henry H A L. Seasonal response of extracellular enzyme activity and microbial biomass to warming and nitrogen addition[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2010, 74(3):820-828.
[24] Teste F P, Lieffers V J, Strelkov S E. Ectomycorrhizal community responses to intensive forest management:Thinning alters impacts of fertilization[J]. Plant and Soil, 2012, 360(1/2):333-347.
[25] Dang P, Gao Y, Liu J L, et al. Effects of thinning intensity on understory vegetation and soil microbial communities of a mature Chinese pine plantation in the Loess Plateau[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 630:171-180.
[26] 李春辉. 不同抚育强度对侧柏林下土壤养分含量的影响[J]. 防护林科技, 2017(5):61-62.
Outlines

/