欢迎访问林草资源研究
Scientific Research

Characteristics of Carbon Density and Its Influencing Factors of Pinus massoniana Forest Based on CBM-CFS3 Model

  • Min ZHANG ,
  • Jian WANG ,
  • Tianyi HAN ,
  • Xunzhi OUYANG ,
  • Ping PAN ,
  • Dongdong LIU
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration for the Protection and Restoration of Forest Ecosystem in Poyang Lake Basin,College of Forestry,Jiangxi Agricultural University,Nanchang 330045,China
    2. Ming Yue Mountain Forestry Centre of Anfu County,Ji’an,Jiangxi 343200,China
    3. Jiangxi Forestry Resources Monitoring Center,Nanchang 330046,China

Received date: 2022-10-14

  Revised date: 2022-10-28

  Online published: 2023-01-16

Abstract

Based on the sample plot data from the forest resources inventory of Ganzhou City,the carbon density of Pinus massoniana forest was calculated by regional scale carbon budget model (CBM-CFS3),and the spatial distribution and influencing factors of carbon density were analyzed by geostatistics and multiple stepwise regression methods,respectively. The results showed that there were differences in the optimal stand age-accumulation equation for different forest types and origins of Pinus massoniana forests. In general,the Logistic model,Richards model and Gompertz model fit better than the Korf model. The total carbon density of the stand was 135.08MgC/hm2,in which the carbon densities of the vegetation layer carbon pool and the dead organic matter (DOM) carbon pool were 41.51MgC/hm2 and 93.57MgC/hm2,respectively. The vegetation layer carbon pool showed as trunk>branches>roots>leaves while DOM carbon pool showed as soil layer>litter>dead wood. The total carbon density of forest stands had a certain positive correlation in space,mainly concentrated in 106.73-161.16MgC/hm2. The area of the low-value carbon density area was larger than the high-value carbon density area,but there was no obvious regularity in space. Age group,average diameter at the breast height (DBH),canopy density and annual mean temperature were all highly significantly and positively correlated with the total carbon density of forest stands (P<0.01),so they were the main factors affecting carbon density. The growth model constructed by the sample plot data from the forest resources inventory was used to estimate forest carbon density in the CBM-CFS3 model,which was conducive to get a more comprehensive and accurate estimation of different carbon pools in regional forests. The vegetation factor was the main factor affecting its carbon density.

Cite this article

Min ZHANG , Jian WANG , Tianyi HAN , Xunzhi OUYANG , Ping PAN , Dongdong LIU . Characteristics of Carbon Density and Its Influencing Factors of Pinus massoniana Forest Based on CBM-CFS3 Model[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2022 , 0(6) : 44 -53 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2022.06.008

References

[1] Thom D, Rammer W, Seidl R. The impact of future forest dynamics on climate:interactive effects of changing vegetation and disturbance regimes[J]. Ecological Monographs, 2017, 87(4):665-684.
[2] 张颖, 李晓格, 温亚利. 碳达峰碳中和背景下中国森林碳汇潜力分析研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44(1):38-47.
[3] 邓喆, 丁文广, 蒲晓婷, 等. 基于InVEST模型的祁连山国家公园碳储量时空分布研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022, 42(3):324-334.
[4] 吴恒, 胥辉. 森林植被碳密度遥感反演和校准研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2021(6):43-51.
[5] 兰秀, 杜虎, 宋同清, 等. 广西主要森林植被碳储量及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(6):2043-2053.
[6] 陶韵, 杨红强. “伞形集团”典型国家LULUCF林业碳评估模型比较研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 44(3):202-210.
[7] Pilli R, Kull S J, Blujdea V N, et al. The carbon budget model of the canadian forest sector(CBM-CFS3):customization of the archive index database for european union countries[J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2018, 75(3):1-7.
[8] Blujdea V N, Sikkema R, Dutca I, et al. Two large-scale forest scenario modelling approaches for reporting CO2 removal:a comparison for the Romanian forests[J]. Carbon Balance and Management, 2021, 16(1):1-17.
[9] Shaw C H, Rodrigue S, Voicu M F, et al. Cumulative effects of natural and anthropogenic disturbances on the forest carbon balance in the oil sands region of Alberta,Canada;a pilot study(1985-2012)[J]. Carbon Balance and Management, 2021, 16(1):1-18.
[10] 冯源, 肖文发, 朱建华, 等. 造林对区域森林生态系统碳储量和固碳速率的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(3):281-290.
[11] Wang H J, Fan K, Sun J Q, et al. A review of seasonal climate prediction research in China[J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2015, 32(2):149-168.
[12] 郭丽玲, 潘萍, 欧阳勋志, 等. 赣南马尾松天然林不同生长阶段碳密度分布特征[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(1):37-45.
[13] 赖国桢, 曹梦, 潘萍, 等. 马尾松木荷不同比例混交林植被碳密度特征[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(2):108-113.
[14] 潘萍, 韩天一, 欧阳勋志, 等. 飞播马尾松林碳密度分配特征及其影响因素[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(12):3841-3847.
[15] 李妙宇, 上官周平, 邓蕾. 黄土高原地区生态系统碳储量空间分布及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(17):6786-6799.
[16] 付甜. 基于CBM-CFS3模型的三峡库区主要森林生态系统碳计量[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2013.
[17] 周涛, 史培军, 惠大丰, 等. 中国土壤呼吸温度敏感性空间格局的反演[J]. 中国科学:C辑生命科学, 2009, 39(3):315-322.
[18] 王晓荣, 雷蕾, 付甜, 等. 抚育择伐对马尾松林凋落叶分解速率和养分释放的短期影响[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(4):12-21.
[19] 王晓荣, 牛红玉, 曾立雄, 等. 不同营林措施对马尾松细根分解与养分释放的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(8):2337-2345.
[20] 付甜, 朱建华, 肖文发, 等. 八种亚热带森林类型乔木层地上生物量分配模型[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(9):1-9.
[21] 郑甲佳, 黄松宇, 贾昕, 等. 中国森林生态系统土壤呼吸温度敏感性空间变异特征及影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(6):687-698.
[22] Hararuk O, Shaw C, Kurz W A. Constraining the organic matter decay parameters in the CBM-CFS3 using Canadian National Forest Inventory data and a Bayesian inversion technique[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2017, 364:1-12.
[23] 黄锦学, 黄李梅, 林智超, 等. 中国森林凋落物分解速率影响因素分析[J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 2010, 5(3):56-63.
[24] 潘萍. 江西省马尾松林生态系统碳密度及其空间异质性研究[D]. 南昌: 江西农业大学, 2018.
[25] 黄国贤, 李清林, 罗盛金, 等. 基于加拿大CBM-CFS3模型的江西庐山森林碳储特征研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2016, 38(4):695-705.
[26] 王云霓, 曹恭祥, 王彦辉, 等. 宁夏六盘山华北落叶松人工林植被碳密度特征[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(10):10-16.
[27] 邵波, 燕腾. 四川省森林植被碳储量及碳密度估算[J]. 西南林业大学学报:自然科学, 2017, 37(2):179-183.
[28] Reich P B, Hobbie S E, Lee T D, et al. Synergistic effects of four climate change drivers on terrestrial carbon cycling[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2020, 13(12):787-793.
[29] 顾洪亮, 王建, 商志远, 等. 马尾松树轮早材晚材年表对气候因子响应的敏感性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(5):1150-1162.
Outlines

/