Forest and Grassland Resources Research >
Effects of Drought Stress and Rehydration on the Physiological Characteristics of Alsophila spinulosa
Received date: 2022-08-20
Revised date: 2022-10-18
Online published: 2022-12-23
In order to find out the adaptability of the woody fern Alsophila spinulosa to the water-deficient environment,three-year-old seedlings were selected and potted to control water for continuous drought stress and rehydration treatment.The changes of osmotic adjustment substance content,malondialdehyde(MDA)content and antioxidant enzyme activity in the leaves were studied after 3,6,8 days of drought and after 3,6,and 9 days of rewatering.The results showed that:1)With the prolongation of the continuous drought time,the soluble sugar content,proline content,superoxide dismutase(SOD)activity and peroxidase(POD)activity increased first and then decreased.The maximum value was reached at 3 days of drought;the contents of soluble protein and malondialdehyde increased gradually,and reached the maximum at 8 days of drought;The catalase(CAT)activity showed a trend of first decreasing and then increasing.Its activity was the highest when adequately watered.2)At 9 days after rehydration,the soluble sugar content,proline content,POD activity,and CAT activity had recovered to the levels below those under adequate water supply;the soluble protein content,MDA content and SOD activity were still slightly higher than those under adequate water supply.It could be seen that under drought stress,the soluble protein content had been increasing,which played a relatively important role in the resistance to drought stress;The soluble sugar content,proline content,SOD activity and POD activity responded rapidly and increased,but began to decline after 3 days of drought,indicating that the tolerance of Alsophila spinulosa was relatively poor to drought stress;At the same time,after re-watering,all physiological indicators quickly recovered to the level of sufficient water supply,indicating that Alsophila spinulosa had a relatively strong recovery ability after encountering drought stress.
Chaoyan LYU , Zhixi GAO , Xingxian XU , Yao ZHANG , Xu CHEN , Jiaojiao SHI . Effects of Drought Stress and Rehydration on the Physiological Characteristics of Alsophila spinulosa[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2022 , 0(5) : 160 -168 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2022.05.020
| [1] | 罗丹丹, 王传宽, 金鹰. 植物水分调节对策:等水与非等水行为[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(9):1020-1032. |
| [2] | Stefania T, Elisa F, Antonio F, et al. Physiological andbiochemical responses in two ornamental shrubs to drought stress[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7:645. |
| [3] | 赵金梅, 周禾, 王秀艳. 水分胁迫下苜蓿品种抗旱生理生化指标变化及其相互关系[J]. 草地学报, 2005, 13(3):184-189. |
| [4] | Nuccio M L, Rhodest D, Mcneil S D, et al. Metabolic engineering of plants for osmotic stress resistance[J]. 1999, 2(2):128-134. |
| [5] | Smirnoff N. Plant resistance to environmental stress[J]. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 1998, 9(2):214-219. |
| [6] | 令狐昱慰, 李汝娟, 李思锋, 等. 土壤干旱胁迫对九头狮子草和圆苞金足草幼苗形态和生理特性的影响[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2013, 22(3):25-32. |
| [7] | 姜英淑, 陈书明, 王秋玉, 等. 干旱胁迫对2个欧李种源生理特征的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 45(6):6-10. |
| [8] | 武燕奇, 郭素娟. 5个板栗品种(系)对持续干旱胁迫和复水的生理响应[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(10):67-74. |
| [9] | 付海静, 张静, 赵元洪, 等. 干旱胁迫对鹅绒委陵菜根系特征和生理代谢的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2020, 48(7):45-49. |
| [10] | 代正福, 周正邦, 欧珍贵, 等. 贵州观赏类野生桫椤科植物资源研究初报[J]. 种子, 1999, 4:43-44. |
| [11] | 许斌, 朱文泉, 李培先. 不同气候条件下桫椤在中国的潜在适生区分布[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(17):6105-6117. |
| [12] | 张华, 赵浩翔, 徐存刚. 气候变化背景下孑遗植物桫椤在中国的潜在地理分布[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(4):968-979. |
| [13] | 赵瑞白, 杨小波, 李东海, 等. 海南岛桫椤科植物地理分布和分布特征研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2018(2):65-73,97. |
| [14] | 刘后鑫. 桫椤科植物叶形态结构特征及其分类学意义[D]. 临汾: 山西师范大学, 2016. |
| [15] | 施利祥. 树型蕨类桫椤生物学特征初探[J]. 宁德师范学院学报:自然科学版, 2007, 19(4):364-366. |
| [16] | 周志琼, 苏智先, 廖永梅, 等. 桫椤的生物学研究进展[J]. 贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2004, 22(3):100-103. |
| [17] | 吴丽丽, 王德炉, 李自玉. 粗壮女贞对持续性干旱及复水的生理响应[J]. 植物生理学报, 2018, 54(5):837-844. |
| [18] | Cabuslay G S, Ito O, Alejar A A. Physiological evaluation of responses of rice(Oryza sativa L.) to water deficit[J]. Plant Science, 2002, 163(4):815-827. |
| [19] | Chen Hui, Jiang Jianguo. Osmotic adjustment and plant adaptation to environmental changes related to drought and salinity[J]. Environmental Reviews, 2010, 18:309-319. |
| [20] | 王娟, 李德全. 逆境条件下植物体内渗透调节物质的积累与活性氧代谢[J]. 植物学通报, 2001, 18(4):459-465. |
| [21] | 余叔文. 植物生理与分子生物学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998. |
| [22] | 魏良民. 几种旱生植物碳水化合物和蛋白质变化的研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 1991, 8(4):38-41. |
| [23] | 范海翔. 低温和干旱对泽泻蕨(Parahemionitis cordata)生理特性的影响研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨师范大学, 2015. |
| [24] | 刘婷婷. 中国产三种水韭的抗逆生理特性研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨师范大学, 2014. |
| [25] | 邵怡若, 许建新, 薛立, 等. 5种绿化树种幼苗对干旱胁迫和复水的生理响应[J]. 生态科学, 2013, 32(4):420-428. |
| [26] | 李君, 周守标, 王春景, 等. 野生和栽培马蹄金抗旱性比较及其抗旱机制初探[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(3):521-527. |
| [27] | 王茜. 粗毛鳞盖蕨(Microlepia strigosa)不同世代的生理特性及其抗旱性研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨师范大学, 2012. |
| [28] | 杨斌, 彭长辉, 张贤, 等. 干旱胁迫对刺槐幼苗叶片氮含量、光合速率及非结构性碳水化合物的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019, 25(6):1261-1269. |
| [29] | 罗银玲, 毕廷菊, 苏志龙, 等. 棒叶落地生根对干旱与复水的生理响应[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2014, 22(4):391-398. |
| [30] | 卢少云, 陈斯平, 陈斯曼, 等. 三种暖季型草坪草在干旱条件下脯氨酸含量和抗氧化酶活性的变化[J]. 园艺学报, 2003, 30(3):303-306. |
| [31] | 黄萍, 张新俊, 朱彬彬, 等. 阿拉伯婆婆纳和白三叶对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性比较[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2020, 55(2):133-137. |
| [32] | 董奇琦, 王婧, 于海秋, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同耐性花生品种生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2020, 51(1):18-26. |
| [33] | 董靖, 李红丽, 董智, 等. H2S对NaCl胁迫下草木樨幼苗生理指标及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(10):2430-2437. |
| [34] | 刘鑫. 五种外源物质缓解笔筒树幼苗干旱胁迫的效应及生理机制的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨师范大学, 2022. |
| [35] | 刘红云, 梁宗锁, 刘淑明, 等. 持续干旱及复水对杜仲幼苗保护酶活性和渗透调节物质的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2007, 22(3):55-59. |
| [36] | 马玉玲, 李爽, 王文佳, 等. 不同干旱胁迫程度对大豆叶片抗氧化特性的影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2018, 49(4):447-452. |
| [37] | 赵孟良, 赵文菊, 郭怡婷, 等. 干旱胁迫及复水对菊芋生长及叶片光合和生理特性的影响[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2019, 28(4):49-57. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |