Forest and Grassland Resources Research >
An Analysis on Over-Identification in Wildlife Criminal Cases
Received date: 2022-03-29
Revised date: 2022-04-16
Online published: 2022-08-04
In wildlife criminal cases,identification is an important method to identify animal species.However,under the influence of various factors,there is a tendency of over-identification that "every case must be identified" in the current judicial practice.Over-identification may lead to many negative consequences.The way to crack over-identification lies in: recognizing the risk of errors in the current identification of animal species,and breaking the myth that expert opinions are scientifically correct;correctly understanding the limits of the pursuit of truth in criminal cases,and reasonably dividing the application scope of identification and identification's alternatives;reasonably organizing collegial panels to reduce the risk of judges' judicial liability and improve the credibility of judicial decisions.
Junxia WU , Jing JIANG , Yongwu ZHOU . An Analysis on Over-Identification in Wildlife Criminal Cases[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2022 , 0(3) : 25 -30 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2022.03.004
| [1] | 薛培. 论破坏野生动物刑事案件鉴定意见的规范审查[J]. 四川警察学院学报, 2020, 32(6):31-37. |
| [2] | 周用武. 对森林公安鉴定工作的思考[J]. 森林公安, 2014(5):32-33. |
| [3] | 龙宗智. 试论建立健全司法绩效考核制度[J]. 政法论坛, 2018, 36(4):3-15. |
| [4] | 本报评论员. 始终坚持程序公正与实体公正并重[N]. 检察日报,2012-07-25(1). |
| [5] | 本报评论员. 努力把每起涉黑恶案件都办成铁案[N]. 法治日报,2019-09-03(1) |
| [6] | 深圳“鹦鹉案”二审:人工驯养是否属于野生动物成争议焦点[EB/OL].(2017-11-07)[2022-01-29]. https://www.sohu.com/a/202897081_653051. |
| [7] | 张安娜, 卢志坚. 被罚没野生动物的命运困局[N]. 检察日报,2020-04-22(5). |
| [8] | 张军. 最高人民检察院工作报告--2022年3月8日在第十三届全国人民代表大会第五次会议上[EB/OL].(2022-03-08)[2022-03-09]. http://news.jcrb.com/jszx/202203/t20220308_2375160.html. |
| [9] | 李秀荣. “天价司法鉴定费”呼唤议价权落地[J]. 人民法治, 2017(2):78. |
| [10] | 费宜玲, 唐松泽, 周用武, 等. 基于大数据探究野生动物的发案规律[J]. 野生动物学报, 2020, 41(4):1136-1141. |
| [11] | 王进喜. 证据科学读本:美国”Daubert”三部曲[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2015:1-8. |
| [12] | 侯森林, 唐绍涵. 野生动物司法鉴定中存在的问题及建议[J]. 辽宁警察学院学报, 2021, 23(1):20-26. |
| [13] | 龙宗智. 论我国刑事审判中的交叉询问制度[J]. 中国法学, 2000(4):85. |
| [14] | 杨际平, 张立雄, 徐志林, 等. 司法鉴定的困境与出路--浙江省乐清市人民法院的实践探索[J]. 人民法治, 2016(5):88-92. |
| [15] | 里德·黑斯蒂. 陪审员的内心世界[M]. 刘威,李恒,译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2006:232. |
| [16] | 特伦斯·安德森, 戴维·舒姆, 威廉·特文宁. 证据分析[M]. 2版.张保生,译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2012:151. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |