欢迎访问林草资源研究
Integrated Management and Administration

An Analysis on Over-Identification in Wildlife Criminal Cases

  • Junxia WU ,
  • Jing JIANG ,
  • Yongwu ZHOU
Expand
  • Nanjing Forest Police College,Nanjing 210046,China

Received date: 2022-03-29

  Revised date: 2022-04-16

  Online published: 2022-08-04

Abstract

In wildlife criminal cases,identification is an important method to identify animal species.However,under the influence of various factors,there is a tendency of over-identification that "every case must be identified" in the current judicial practice.Over-identification may lead to many negative consequences.The way to crack over-identification lies in: recognizing the risk of errors in the current identification of animal species,and breaking the myth that expert opinions are scientifically correct;correctly understanding the limits of the pursuit of truth in criminal cases,and reasonably dividing the application scope of identification and identification's alternatives;reasonably organizing collegial panels to reduce the risk of judges' judicial liability and improve the credibility of judicial decisions.

Cite this article

Junxia WU , Jing JIANG , Yongwu ZHOU . An Analysis on Over-Identification in Wildlife Criminal Cases[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2022 , 0(3) : 25 -30 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2022.03.004

References

[1] 薛培. 论破坏野生动物刑事案件鉴定意见的规范审查[J]. 四川警察学院学报, 2020, 32(6):31-37.
[2] 周用武. 对森林公安鉴定工作的思考[J]. 森林公安, 2014(5):32-33.
[3] 龙宗智. 试论建立健全司法绩效考核制度[J]. 政法论坛, 2018, 36(4):3-15.
[4] 本报评论员. 始终坚持程序公正与实体公正并重[N]. 检察日报,2012-07-25(1).
[5] 本报评论员. 努力把每起涉黑恶案件都办成铁案[N]. 法治日报,2019-09-03(1)
[6] 深圳“鹦鹉案”二审:人工驯养是否属于野生动物成争议焦点[EB/OL].(2017-11-07)[2022-01-29]. https://www.sohu.com/a/202897081_653051.
[7] 张安娜, 卢志坚. 被罚没野生动物的命运困局[N]. 检察日报,2020-04-22(5).
[8] 张军. 最高人民检察院工作报告--2022年3月8日在第十三届全国人民代表大会第五次会议上[EB/OL].(2022-03-08)[2022-03-09]. http://news.jcrb.com/jszx/202203/t20220308_2375160.html.
[9] 李秀荣. “天价司法鉴定费”呼唤议价权落地[J]. 人民法治, 2017(2):78.
[10] 费宜玲, 唐松泽, 周用武, 等. 基于大数据探究野生动物的发案规律[J]. 野生动物学报, 2020, 41(4):1136-1141.
[11] 王进喜. 证据科学读本:美国”Daubert”三部曲[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2015:1-8.
[12] 侯森林, 唐绍涵. 野生动物司法鉴定中存在的问题及建议[J]. 辽宁警察学院学报, 2021, 23(1):20-26.
[13] 龙宗智. 论我国刑事审判中的交叉询问制度[J]. 中国法学, 2000(4):85.
[14] 杨际平, 张立雄, 徐志林, 等. 司法鉴定的困境与出路--浙江省乐清市人民法院的实践探索[J]. 人民法治, 2016(5):88-92.
[15] 里德·黑斯蒂. 陪审员的内心世界[M]. 刘威,李恒,译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2006:232.
[16] 特伦斯·安德森, 戴维·舒姆, 威廉·特文宁. 证据分析[M]. 2版.张保生,译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2012:151.
Outlines

/