Forest and Grassland Resources Research >
Study on Soil Quality and Vegetation Changes of Abandoned Farmland in Shallow Qilian Mountains
Received date: 2022-03-02
Revised date: 2022-03-18
Online published: 2022-08-04
In order to more intuitively and scientifically reflect the changes of soil and vegetation ecological benefits of the abandoned farmland in the shallow mountainous area of Qilian Mountains,the soil physicochemical properties and vegetation coverage were measured and analyzed in Shandan Dahuangshan Demonstration Area of Soil and Water Conservation technology in the shallow Qilian Mountains.The results indicated that soil moisture and bulk density in seabuckthorn forest were lower than those in grassland,while soil moisture capacity and porosity were higher.Soil bulk density was significantly negatively correlated with soil water holding capacity,capillary porosity and total porosity (P<0.05).Soil water storage of seabuckthorn forest was slightly higher than that of grassland,but the difference was not significant (P>0.05).The contents of soil nutrients,such as electrical conductivity,available K,available phosphorus and organic matter,in the enclosed grassland were higher than those in the unclosed grassland and the seabuckthorn forest.The contents of pH and alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen in the unclosed grassland were higher than those in the other land types,and the total nitrogen content in the seabuckthorn forest was slightly higher than that in the other land types.Between 2017 and 2020,the vegetation coverage in the demonstration area increased from 69% to 78.8%,with an average annual increase of 3.26%.
Key words： abandoned farmland; soil nutrient; vegetation coverage; Qilian Mountains
Yanli DONG , Aihua CHEN , Guangzeng QI , Feng ZHANG , Yazhu WANG , Jinhua TIAN . Study on Soil Quality and Vegetation Changes of Abandoned Farmland in Shallow Qilian Mountains[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2022 , 0(3) : 110 -116 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2022.03.017
| [1] | 刘胜涛, 牛香, 王兵, 等. 陕西省退耕还林工程生态效益评估[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(16):5759-5770. |
| [2] | 赵玉涛. 继续实施退耕还林的必要性与可行性分析[J]. 生态经济:学术版, 2010(7):81-83. |
| [3] | 苏冰倩, 王茵茵, 上官周平. 西北地区新一轮退耕还林还草规模分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2017, 24(4):59-65. |
| [4] | 焦梦妍, 从怀军, 姚静, 杜好田. 自然恢复序列梯度上退耕地土壤容重变化及其蓄水性能效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(5):128-133. |
| [5] | 刘海威, 张少康, 焦峰. 黄土丘陵区不同退耕年限草地群落特征及其土壤水分养分效应[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(10):31-39. |
| [6] | 王佳, 田青, 王理德, 等. 青土湖不同年限退耕地植被物种多样性及土壤酶活性研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2021, 41(11):1900-1911. |
| [7] | 刘若莎, 王冬梅, 杨海龙, 等. 青海黄土高寒区植被生态功能评价及优化措施[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2021, 19(1):97-105. |
| [8] | 尚雪, 何钊全, 张铜会. 退耕还林(草)过程中陕北地区NDVI时空变异及其驱动因子的地理探测[J]. 生态科学, 2022, 41(1):66-76. |
| [9] | 孟好军, 张宏斌, 徐柏林, 等. 祁连山区造林地封育效果的研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2013, 33(12):22-26. |
| [10] | 董彦丽, 李泽霞, 高金芳, 等. 祁连山浅山区退耕地土壤团聚体及其有机碳和全氮的分布特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020, 40(4):60-66. |
| [11] | 孙艳红, 张洪江, 程金花, 等. 缙云山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J]. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20(2):106-109. |
| [12] | 马俊梅, 满多清, 李得禄, 等. 干旱荒漠区退耕地植被演替及土壤水分变化[J]. 中国沙漠, 2018, 38(4):800-807. |
| [13] | 焦梦妍, 从怀军, 姚静, 等. 自然恢复序列梯度上退耕地土壤容重变化及其蓄水性能效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(5):128-133. |
| [14] | 刘霞, 张光灿, 李雪蕾, 等. 小流域生态修复过程中不同森林植被土壤入渗与贮水特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2004, 18(6):1-5. |
| [15] | 祝景彬, 贺慧丹, 李红琴, 等. 高寒草甸草地土壤贮水量对牧压梯度的响应[J]. 中国草地学报, 2018, 40(4):88-94. |
| [16] | 贺慧丹, 祝景彬, 未亚西, 等. 高寒草甸土壤贮水量对封育措施的响应[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(3):210-216. |
| [17] | 胡小燕, 段爱国, 张建国, 等. 南亚热带杉木人工成熟林密度对土壤养分效应研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31(3):15-23. |
| [18] | 焦峰, 温仲明, 焦菊英, 等. 黄丘区退耕地植被与土壤水分养分的互动效应[J]. 草业学报, 2006, 15(2):79-84. |
| [19] | 柴春山, 王子婷, 张洋东, 等. 陇中半干旱黄土丘陵区土壤养分空间分布特征[J]. 林业资源管理, 2021(4):114-120. |
| [20] | 刘瑞瑶, 许丽, 丰菲, 刘莹, 张新蕾. 2000-2018年乌海市植被覆盖度时空变化[J]. 水土保持究, 2022, 29(2):265-273. |
| [21] | 范建忠, 李登科, 周辉. 陕西省退耕还林工程区植被覆盖度的变化分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(4):207-213. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
