欢迎访问林草资源研究

Forest and Grassland Resources Research >

2022 , Vol. 0 >Issue 2: 91 - 99

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2022.02.013

Spatiotemporal Variations and Topographic Differentiation of Fractional Vegetation Cover in Minjiang River

  • Qianqian GAO ,
  • Can CHEN ,
  • Hena LIU ,
  • Qian LUO ,
  • Xia LI ,
  • Yongming LIN ,
  • Chengzhen WU
Expand
  • 1. College of Forestry,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350002,China
    2. Collegiate Key Lab of Forest-Ecosystem Process and Management in Fujian,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350002,China
    3. Fujian Forestry Vocational & Technical College,Nanping,Fujian 353000,China
    4. College of Ecology and Resource Engineering,Wuyi University,Nanping,Fujian 354300,China

Received date: 2021-11-25

  Revised date: 2022-03-01

  Online published: 2022-06-13

Fold

Abstract

In order to reveal the influence of the complexity of the regional topography on the vegetation coverage and to provide the basis for formulating reasonable economic and environment protection strategies in the basin area,this paper used the mixed pixel decomposition method to estimate the vegetation coverage,and analyzed the temporal and spatial characteristics of vegetation coverage and the topographic differentiation characteristics of vegetation change based on the Landsat TM and Landsat OLI images of the Minjiang River Basin in Fujian Province in 2003,2009,2014 and 2019 respectively. The results showed that:1)TheFractional Vegetation Cover (FVC) in the Minjiang River Basin increased from 0.72 in 2003 to 0.81 in 2019 and the FVC in the mountainous area was better than that along lakes and rivers. 2)The basin as a whole was developing in the direction of restoration.,and the vegetation coverage grades I,II,III,and IV transformed to grade V. Except for the expansion of grade V,the area of all grades had contracted,and the contraction area was IV (0.43)> III(0.39)> II(0.36)>I(0.17).3) The vegetation coverage of flat land was the smallest.With the elevation and slope increasing,the vegetation coverage of the Minjiang River Basin increased. In the range of elevation < 377 m and slope < 30 °,the degraded area was larger than the repaired area. The stability of vegetation coverage on flat land is the lowest. The analysis showed that the vegetation coverage of Minjiang River Basinwas affected by topographic factors. When formulating vegetation restoration policies,topographic factors should be fully considered.

Key words： Minjiang River Basin; Fractional Vegetation Cover; spatial and temporal variation; topography

Cite this article

Qianqian GAO , Can CHEN , Hena LIU , Qian LUO , Xia LI , Yongming LIN , Chengzhen WU . Spatiotemporal Variations and Topographic Differentiation of Fractional Vegetation Cover in Minjiang River[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2022 , 0(2) : 91 -99 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2022.02.013

References

[1] Liu Fangyu, Xiao Xingyuan, Shang Luxiang, et al. Study on spatial-temporal dynamic change of vegetation coverage and its influencing factors in blue economic zone of Shandong Peninsula:taking Qingdao as a case[J]. IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 632(2):1-11.
[2] 李彩霞, 胡砚霞, 邓帆, 等. 湖北省植被覆盖度时空变化特征与影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(8):1829-1838.
[3] 杨彩云, 王世曦, 杨春艳, 等. 川藏铁路沿线植被覆盖度时空变化特征分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(3):174-182.
[4] 宋超, 余琦殷, 王瑞霞, 等. 基于植被覆盖度的宁夏灵武白芨滩自然保护区防风固沙功能时空变化研究[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(8):3131-3143.
[5] 林森, 胡喜生, 吴承祯, 等. 武夷山国家公园植被覆盖演变的时空特征[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2020, 40(4):347-355.
[6] 岳健, 穆桂金, 唐自华, 等. 基于NDVI的新疆荒漠地区植被覆盖度遥感估算经验模型研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(1):153-160.
[7] 邢著荣, 冯幼贵, 杨贵军, 等. 基于遥感的植被覆盖度估算方法述评[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2009, 24(6):849-854.
[8] Tucker C J, Slayback D A, Pinzon J E,etal. Highernorthern latitude normalized difference v-egetation indexand growing season trends from 1982 to 1999[J]. International Journal of Bio-meteorology, 2001, 45(4):184-190.
[9] 戴声佩, 张勃, 王海军, 等. 中国西北地区植被覆盖变化驱动因子分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2010, 33(4):636-643.
[10] Jung G, Prange M, Schulz M. Influence of topography on tropical African vegetation coverage[J]. Climate Dynamics, 2016, 46(7/8):2535-2549.
[11] 蔡宏, 何政伟, 安艳玲, 等. 基于RS和GIS的赤水河流域植被覆盖度与各地形因子的相关强度研究[J]. 地球与环境, 2014, 42(4):518-524.
[12] 汤巧英, 戚德辉, 宋立旺, 等. 基于GIS和 RS的延河流域植被覆盖度与地形因子的相关性研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2017, 24(4):198-203.
[13] 陈洪磊, 欧阳炜, 吕凤玲, 等. 官渡河流域植被覆盖变化与地形因子相关性[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(3):135-140.
[14] 张诗羽, 张毅, 王昌全, 等. 岷江上游流域植被覆盖度及其与地形因子的相关性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018, 38(1):69-75.
[15] 张军, 贾春蓉, 李鹏, 等. 陕西省丹江流域 NDVI分布及其与土地利用的关系[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2016, 14(2):67-73.
[16] 程圣东, 李占斌, 鲁克新, 等. 文安驿流域植被覆盖度时空分异及其与地貌因子关系研究[J]. 西安理工大学学报, 2011, 27(2):145-150.
[17] 田地, 张厚喜, 刘政, 等. 地形因子对长汀县植被覆盖度时空特征的驱动影响[J]. 福建农林大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 48(6):796-802.
[18] 杨婷婷, 郭福涛, 王文辉, 等. 福建长汀红壤区植被覆盖度变化趋势分析[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2016, 36(1):15-21.
[19] 赵文慧, 陈妮, 闫瑞, 等. 近20年来北洛河流域植被覆盖度随地形因子变化特征探究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2016, 23(4):10-14.
[20] 张瑜伟, 苗小莉, 张泳. 基于多源遥感数据的植被覆盖度反演方法比较研究[J]. 测绘与空间地理信息, 2020, 43(3):131-134.
[21] 邓晨晖, 白红英, 高山, 等. 秦岭植被覆盖时空变化及其对气候变化与人类活动的双重响应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(3):425-438.
[22] 杨灿, 魏天兴, 李亦然, 等. 黄土高原典型县域植被覆盖度时空变化及地形分异特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(6):1830-1838.
[23] 张丹红, 王效科, 张路. 大比例尺土壤保持服务制图分级方法研究[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(4):1391-1401.
[24] 银朵朵, 王艳慧. 温带大陆性半干旱季风气候区植被覆盖度时空变化及其地形分异研究[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(3):1158-1167.
[25] 王军, 严有龙, 王金满, 等. 闽江流域生境质量时空演变特征与预测研究[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(14):5837-5848.
[26] 台风“苏拉”“达维”“海葵”造成全国12省市受灾[J]. 中国应急管理, 2012, 68(8):66.
[27] 王一帆, 徐涵秋. 利用MODIS EVI时间序列数据分析福建省植被变化(2000—2017年)[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1):245-254.
[28] 刘尧文, 沙晋明. 基于Landsat影像的多时相植被覆盖度与地形因子关系研究——以平潭岛为例[J]. 福建师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 32(4):89-98.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉