Forest and Grassland Resources Research >
Study on Spatial Distribution of Land Desertification Sensitivity in Naiman Banner
Received date: 2021-11-12
Revised date: 2021-12-08
Online published: 2022-03-31
Taking Naiman Banner as the research object,this paper selected five factors as evaluation indexes: dryness index,windy sand days,soil silt content,vegetation coverage and slope. The study area was divided into five grades: extremely sensitive,highly sensitive,moderately sensitive,slightly sensitive and insensitive. The spatial distribution and influencing factors of land desertification sensitivity were studied and analyzed. The results showed that: 1) on the whole,in 2020,Naiman Banner had the largest land area with mild desertification sensitivity,accounting for 29.7% of the total area;Followed by high sensitive land,accounting for 22.9%;Moderately sensitive land,accounting for 22.2%;Insensitive grade,accounting for 15.2%;The land area of extremely sensitive grade accounted for the lowest,which was 10.0%. The land desertification sensitivity of Naiman Banner decreased from north to south in space. 2) In terms of natural conditions,the main reason for the spatial difference of desertification sensitivity was vegetation coverage,followed by windy sand days,dryness index,soil silt content and slope. 3) From the perspective of land use,human activities also had a certain impact on land desertification. The sensitivity of land desertification was positively correlated with the area of cultivated land and sandy land,and negatively correlated with the area of forest land.
Kai ZHAO , Yongjie YUE , Rong HE , Yaqian WANG , Yunzhula WU . Study on Spatial Distribution of Land Desertification Sensitivity in Naiman Banner[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2022 , 0(1) : 52 -60 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2022.01.007
| [1] | 吴亚茜, 谭汉基, 张克斌. 浅析我国荒漠化的防治措施体系[J]. 中国科技纵横, 2014(15):278. |
| [2] | 李靖宇, 张琇. 腾格里沙漠不同生物土壤结皮微生物多样性分析[J]. 生态科学, 2017(3):36-42. |
| [3] | 全桂静, 曹成有. 科尔沁沙地土壤酶活性与植被的关系[J]. 沈阳化工大学学报, 2006(4):258-260. |
| [4] | 欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究[J]. 生态学报, 2000,20(1):9-12. |
| [5] | 徐玲玲, 延昊, 钱拴. 基于MODIS-NDVI的2000—2018年中国北方土地沙漠化敏感性时空变化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020,35(4):925-936. |
| [6] | 胡梦甜, 张慧, 高吉喜, 等. 基于RWEQ模型修正的土地沙漠化敏感性评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021,28(1):368-372. |
| [7] | 刘军会, 高吉喜, 马苏, 等. 内蒙古生态环境敏感性综合评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015,35(2):591-598. |
| [8] | 张强, 冯悦, 魏伟, 等. 基于GIS的祁连山生态敏感性评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2019,19(3):1056-1064. |
| [9] | 张国平, 张增祥, 刘纪远. 中国土壤风力侵蚀空间格局及驱动因子分析[J]. 地理学报, 2001,56(2):146-158. |
| [10] | 郭泽呈, 魏伟, 石培基, 等. 中国西北干旱区土地沙漠化敏感性时空格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020,75(9):1948-1965. |
| [11] | 周利军, 张淑花. 黑龙江省西南部土地沙漠化敏感性评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009,25(21):324-327. |
| [12] | 赵志荣, 许端阳, 张绪教, 等. 2000-2015年内蒙古地区土地沙漠化脆弱性评估[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020,27(1):168-175. |
| [13] | 中国科学院自然区划工作委员会. 中国气候区划(初稿)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1959. |
| [14] | 许冬梅, 赵丽莉, 谢应忠. 盐池县草地沙漠化过程中植物群落的动态变化[J]. 西北植物学报, 2011,31(10):2084-2089. |
| [15] | 陈玉福, 董鸣. 毛乌素沙地景观的植被与土壤特征空间格局及其相关分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2001,25(3):265-269. |
| [16] | 邱开阳, 谢应忠, 许冬梅, 等. 毛乌素沙地南缘沙漠化临界区域土壤水分和植被空间格局[J]. 生态学报, 2011,31(10):2697-2707. |
| [17] | Chen Yufu, Yu Feihai, Dong Ming. Scale-dependent spatial heterogeneity of vegetation in Mu Us sandy land,a semi-arid area of China[J]. Plant Ecology, 2002,162(1):135-142. |
| [18] | Ferreira J N, Bustamante M, Garcia-Montiel D C, et al. Spatial variation in vegetation structure coupled to plant available water determined by two-dimensional soil resistivity profiling in a Brazilian savanna[J]. Oecologia, 2007,153(2):417-430. |
| [19] | 胡相明, 程积民, 万惠娥, 等. 黄土丘陵区地形、土壤水分与草地的景观格局[J]. 生态学报, 2006,26(10):3276-3285. |
| [20] | 唐庄生, 安慧, 邓蕾, 等. 荒漠草原沙漠化植物群落及土壤物理变化[J]. 生态学报, 2016,36(4):991-1000. |
| [21] | 左小安, 赵学勇, 赵哈林, 等. 科尔沁沙地草地退化过程中的物种组成及功能多样性变化特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2006,20(1):181-185. |
| [22] | 李小双, 彭明春, 党承林. 植物自然更新研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2007,26(12):2081-2088. |
| [23] | 王跃辉, 张林波, 郭杨, 等. 中国六省土地沙漠化敏感性时空格局与趋势分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2014,21(5):132-137. |
| [24] | 徐广才, 康慕谊, Marc Metzger, 等. 锡林郭勒盟生态脆弱性[J]. 生态学报, 2012,32(5):1643-1653. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |