欢迎访问林草资源研究
Scientific Research

Carbon Sequestration Rate and Dynamic Analysis of Main Arbor Forest Types in Sichuan Province

  • Heng WU ,
  • Hui XU
Expand
  • 1. Southwest Forestry University,Kunming 650224,China
    2. Kunming Survey & Design Institute of National Forestry and Grassland Administration,Kunming 650216,China

Received date: 2021-07-16

  Revised date: 2021-09-08

  Online published: 2021-11-29

Abstract

Forest biomass is the basic information for studying energy flow and material cycle in forest ecosystem.Forest carbon sink analysis is of significance to achieve carbon neutrality before 2060.Based on the data of four continuous forest inventories in Sichuan Province,this paper systematically compared the differences in biomass and carbon storage estimation between the single-tree model summation method and the expansion factor method,established the carbon sequestration rate models of 19 major arboreal stands,and analyzed its carbon sequestration potential and distribution of carbon storage density.The results showed that there was no statistical difference in biomass and carbon storage estimation between the single-tree model summation method and the expansion factor method.The differences in biomass and carbon storage density of forest vegetation mainly came from the estimation differences of arbor stands.The fitting determination coefficients of carbon sequestration rate models of major arbor stands were all greater than 0.7.The carbon sequestration potential of poplar stand,birch stand,broad-leaved mixed stand,softwood broad-leaved stand,and hardwood broad-leaved stand increased rapidly during young age.The carbon sequestration potential of the coniferous and broad-leaved mixed stand,fir stand,Chinese pine stand,cypress stand,coniferous mixed stand,and spruce stand was greater during mature age.The forest vegetation biomass and carbon storage density increased gradually in Sichuan from 2002 to 2017,showing a trend of transfer from low density to high density.

Cite this article

Heng WU , Hui XU . Carbon Sequestration Rate and Dynamic Analysis of Main Arbor Forest Types in Sichuan Province[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2021 , 0(5) : 47 -55 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2021.05.007

References

[1] 吴恒, 胥辉. 抽样技术在森林生物量调查中的应用综述[J]. 西南林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2021, 41(3):183-188.
[2] 闫睿. 重庆市乔木林碳储量动态分析及潜力预测[J]. 林业经济, 2019, 41(7):70-77.
[3] 戴巍. 浙江省森林生态系统碳密度及储量空间变异特征研究[D]. 杭州:浙江农林大学, 2018.
[4] 黄从德, 张健, 杨万勤, 等. 四川省及重庆地区森林植被碳储量动态[J]. 生态学报, 2008(3):966-975.
[5] 张赫林. 区域森林覆盖变化与生物量估算方法研究[D]. 重庆:重庆交通大学, 2018.
[6] 曹恭祥, 郭中, 王云霓, 等. 呼伦贝尔沙地樟子松人工林乔木层固碳速率及其对气象因子的响应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(4):1082-1090.
[7] 陈科宇, 字洪标, 阿的鲁骥, 等. 青海省森林乔木层碳储量现状及固碳潜力[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(8):831-840.
[8] 徐凤银, 王勃, 赵欣, 等. “双碳”目标下推进中国煤层气业务高质量发展的思考与建议[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(3):9-18.
[9] Liu Qiannan, Ouyang Zhiyun, Li Ainong, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of biomass and carbon storage in forest vegetation in chongqing based on RS and GIS[J]. Nature Environment & Polution Technology, 2016, 15(4):1381-1388
[10] 国家林业和草原局. 中国森林资源报告(2014—2018)[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2019:218-221.
[11] GB/T 38590-2020,森林资源连续清查技术规程[S].
[12] 金艳强, 包维楷. 四川柏木人工林林下植被生物量与林分结构的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(20):5849-5859.
[13] 施鹏程, 彭道黎, 黄国胜, 等. 三峡库区乔木林生物量和碳储量的估算[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(6):1052-1059.
[14] 张文, 赖长鸿, 张诚, 等. 森林资源调查与林业碳汇计量耦合性的探讨[J]. 四川林业科技, 2013, 34(2):85-90.
[15] 李广宇, 陈爽, 张慧, 等. 2000—2010年长三角地区植被生物量及其空间分布特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(5):708-715.
[16] 胡峻嶍, 黄访, 铁烈华, 等. 四川省森林植被固碳经济价值动态[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(1):158-163.
[17] 孟祥江, 周恺. 基于森林资源二类调查数据的重庆市森林碳储量估算研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(27):11038-11040.
[18] 燕腾, 彭一航, 王效科, 等. 西南5省市区森林植被碳储量及碳密度估算[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2016, 31(4):39-43.
[19] 曾伟生, 陈新云, 蒲莹, 等. 基于国家森林资源清查数据的不同生物量和碳储量估计方法的对比分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31(1):66-71.
Outlines

/