欢迎访问林草资源研究

Forest and Grassland Resources Research >

2017 , Vol. 0 >Issue 3: 86 - 90

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.03.017

Scientific Research

Aesthetic Quality Evaluation of Background Forest of Hilly Villages in Fujian Province under Medium Visual Distance

  • Minhua WANG ,
  • Weicong FU ,
  • Ziru CHEN ,
  • Zhipeng ZHU ,
  • Shuping HUANG ,
  • Ruoke LAN ,
  • Jianwen DONG
Expand
  • 1. College of Arts & Landscape Architecture,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350002,China
    2. State Forestry Administration National Forest Park Engineering Research Center,Fuzhou 350002,China

Received date: 2017-03-20

  Revised date: 2017-05-01

  Online published: 2020-09-24

Fold

Abstract

This paper aims at comprehensively and systematically evaluating the aesthetic quality of rural areas background forest,providing guidance for promotion of countryside landscape and the construction of “ Beautiful Country”.It comprehensively evaluated and analyzed the countryside background forest in hilly areas of Fujian province,utilizing the medium sight distance as research scale in comprehensive and innovative methods of SBE,SD and AHP,combining with visitors’ visual and psychological assessment.The results showed that:1.Almost all respondents(97.7%)yearned to rural tourism,and most of them(67.4%)had finished a rural tour while 83.5% of them thought mountain landscape as an important part consisting of rural overall landscape.2.Architectural uniformity,architecture mode,horizon color number and other 8 elements were the main leading factors which had great impact on the aesthetic quality of countryside background forest.3.Comprehensive evaluation model of aesthetics on background forest in Fujian province hilly village was built.We can conclude that when researching the rural landscape evaluation with SBE,SD and AHP methods,we acquired the comprehensive evaluation model of visual and psychological as well as operable assessment method with great significance of generalizing.Establishing the comprehensive evaluation model of aesthetics also provided great guidance for constructing the “Beautiful Country”.

Key words： mountainous and hilly district; landscape; emotion; SBE; SD

Cite this article

Minhua WANG , Weicong FU , Ziru CHEN , Zhipeng ZHU , Shuping HUANG , Ruoke LAN , Jianwen DONG . Aesthetic Quality Evaluation of Background Forest of Hilly Villages in Fujian Province under Medium Visual Distance[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2017 , 0(3) : 86 -90 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.03.017

References

[1] 福建省2010年第六次全国人口普查主要数据公报[[1]EB/OL]. (2011-05-25)[2017-04-29]. http://www.stats-fj.gov.cn/xxgk/tjgb/201105/t20110525_29535.htm.
[2] Fleischer A, Tchetchik A. Does rural tourism benefit from agriculture?[J]. Tourism Management, 2005,26(4):493-501.
[3] 郭焕成, 韩非. 中国乡村旅游发展综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010,29(12):1597-1605.
[4] Chen W Y, Jim C Y. Cost-benefit analysis of the leisure value of urban greening in the new Chinese city of Zhuhai[J]. Cities, 2008,25(5):298-309.
[5] 张彪, 谢高地, 薛康, 等. 北京城市绿地调蓄雨水径流功能及其价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2011,31(13):3839-3845.
[6] 王超, 翟明普, 金莹杉, 等. 森林景观质量评价研究现状及趋势[J]. 世界林业研究, 2006,19(6):18-22.
[7] Val G F, Jose A, Atruri, et al. Relationship between landscape visual attributes and spatial pattern indices:A test study in Mediterranean-climate landscapes[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006,77:393-407.
[8] Dramstad W E, Tveit M S, Fjellstad W J, et al. Relationships between visual landscape preferences and mapbased indicators of landscape structure[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006,78:465-474.
[9] Palmer J F. Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape:Dennis,Massachusetts[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004,69:201-208.
[10] 刘翠玲, 潘存德, 寇福堂, 等. 新疆喀纳斯旅游区森林景观美学质量与自然火干扰的关系. 林业科学, 2010,, 46(1):9-14.
[11] 周年兴, 黄震方, 蒋铭萍, 等. 庐山森林景观美学质量与景观格局指数的关系[J]. 地理研究, 2012,, 31(7):1224-1232.
[12] 董建文, 廖艳梅, 许贤书, 等. 秋季观赏植物单株美景度评价[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010,38(3):42-46.
[13] 董建文, 章志都, 许贤书, 等. 福建省山地坡面风景游憩林美景度综合评价及构建技术[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010,38(4):45-48.
[14] 董冬, 周志翔, 何云核, 等. 安徽省九华山风景区古树群落景观美学评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2011,30(8):1786-1792.
[15] 毛炯玮, 朱飞捷, 车生泉. 城市自然遗留地景观美学评价的方法研究——心理物理学方法的理论与应用[J]. 中国园林, 2010(3):51-54.
[16] 王亚娟. 基于SBE和SD法的北京市郊野公园视觉景观质量研究[D]. 北京:首都师范大学, 2013.
[17] 陈鑫峰, 贾黎明. 京西山区森林林内景观评价研究[J]. 林业科学, 2003,39(4):59-66.
[18] 章俊华. 规划设计学中的调查分析法16——SD法[J]. 中国园林, 2004(10):54-58.
[19] 俞孔坚, 吉庆萍. 专家与公众景观审美差异研究及对策[J]. 中国园林, 1990,6(2):19-23.
[20] 朱解放. 基于SD法的北京市森林游憩空间质量研宄[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2012.
[21] 齐津达, 傅伟聪, 李炜, 等. 基于GIS与SBE法的旗山国家森林公园景观视觉评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2015,, 30(2):245-250.
[22] 傅伟聪, 董嘉莹, 王茜, 等. 福州市冬季若干典型游憩地大气颗粒物浓度日变化规律研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2014,35(2):348-354.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉