欢迎访问林草资源研究

Forest and Grassland Resources Research >

2021 , Vol. 0 >Issue 4: 114 - 120

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2021.04.015

Scientific Research

Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil Nutrients in Semi-Arid Loess Hilly Area of Longzhong

  • Chunshan CHAI ,
  • Ziting WANG ,
  • Yangdong ZHANG ,
  • Jianli QI
Expand
  • Gansu Academy of Forestry Science,Lanzhou 730020,China

Received date: 2021-06-11

  Revised date: 2021-07-07

  Online published: 2021-09-26

Fold

Abstract

In order to provide scientific referencess for vegetation restoration and reconstruction in semi-arid loess area,the soil nutrients were measured and analyzed in 4 typical land use types(cropland,abandoned cropland,grassland,forestland) and 3 watersheds(Anjiagou,Longtan,Diaogou) in loess hilly area of Longzhong,Gansu Province.Variance analysis indicated that the soil nutrient content had no significant differences(P>0.05) among three watersheds except for total K,but had significant differences among different land use types(P<0.05);there were no significant differences(P>0.05) in soil nutrients between different slope aspects for cropland and abandoned cropland,also there were no significant differences(P>0.05) between different vegetations of forestland,but there were significant differences(P<0.05) between different vegetations of grassland.Variation analysis showed that there were small differences in nutrient variation among different watersheds,but great differences among different land use types.Correlation analysis showed that there was significant correlation among soil nutrients(P<0.05). The comprehensive analysis showed that in semi-arid loess hilly area,the geographical location of the watershed had no obvious influence on the content and distribution of soil nutrients,but the land use type had a great influence on the content and distribution of soil nutrients.Under the same land use type,slope aspect had no obvious influence on soil nutrient content and distribution,but the vegetation type had certain influence on soil nutrient content and distribution.The conversion of cropland to forestland and grassland was beneficial to the recovery of soil nutrients.

Key words： semi-arid loess area; land use type; vegetation type; soil nutrient; distribution of soil nutrient

Cite this article

Chunshan CHAI , Ziting WANG , Yangdong ZHANG , Jianli QI . Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil Nutrients in Semi-Arid Loess Hilly Area of Longzhong[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2021 , 0(4) : 114 -120 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2021.04.015

References

[1] 山仑, 徐炳成. 黄土高原半干旱地区建设稳定人工草地的探讨[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(2):1-2.
[2] 王子婷, 杨磊, 蔡国军, 等. 半干旱黄土区坡面尺度柠条生长状况及影响要素分析[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(23):7872-7881.
[3] 巩杰, 陈利顶, 傅伯杰, 等. 黄土丘陵区小流域植被恢复的土壤养分效应研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2005, 19(1):93-96.
[4] 李玉山. 黄土区土壤水分循环特征及其对陆地水分循环的影响[J]. 生态学报, 1983, 3(2):91-101.
[5] 徐志尧, 张钦弟, 杨磊. 半干旱黄土丘陵区土壤水分生长季动态分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018. 32(3):145-151.
[6] 杨磊, 卫伟, 莫保儒, 等. 半干旱黄土丘陵区不同人工植被恢复土壤水分的相对亏缺[J]. 生态学报2011, 31(11):3060-3068.
[7] 王子婷, 于洪波, 莫保儒, 等. 定西龙滩流域不同人工植被类型土壤水分动态研究[J]. 甘肃林业科技, 2009, 34(1):14-19.
[8] 侯庆春, 黄旭, 韩世峰, 等. 黄土高原地区小老树成因及其改造途径的研究Ⅱ:土壤水分和养分状况及其与小老树生长的关系[J]. 水土保持学报, 1991, 5(2):75-83.
[9] 侯庆春, 黄旭, 韩世峰, 等. 关于黄土高原地区小老树成因及其改造途径的研究Ⅲ:小老树的成因及其改造途径[J]. 水土保持学报, 1991, 5(4):80-86.
[10] 胡小燕, 段爱国, 张建国, 等. 南亚热带杉木人工成熟林密度对土壤养分效应研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31(3):15-23.
[11] 李裕元, 邵明安, 郑纪勇, 等. 黄土高原北部草地的恢复与重建对土壤有机碳的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(6):2279-2287.
[12] 焦峰, 温仲明, 焦菊英, 等. 黄丘区退耕地植被与土壤水分养分的互动效应[J]. 草业学报, 2006, 15(2):79-84.
[13] 傅伯杰, 王军, 马克明. 黄土丘陵区土地利用对土壤水分的影响[J]. 中国科学基金, 1999(4):225-227.
[14] 徐炳成, 山仑. 半干旱黄土丘陵区白羊草人工草地生产力和土壤水分特征研究[J]. 草业科学, 2004, 21(6):6-10.
[15] 莫保儒, 蔡国军, 赵廷宁, 等. 甘肃半干旱黄土丘陵沟壑区人工植被土壤水分研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2009, 16(6):126-128.
[16] 杨磊, 卫伟, 陈利顶, 等. 半干旱黄土丘陵区人工植被深层土壤干化效应[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(1):71-81.
[17] 卫伟, 陈利顶, 傅伯杰, 等. 半干旱黄土丘陵沟壑区降雨特征值和下垫面因子影响下的水土流失规律[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(11):3817-3853.
[18] 郝文芳, 杜峰, 陈小燕, 等. 黄土丘陵区天然群落的植物组成、植物多样性及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2012, 20(4):609-615.
[19] 刘海威, 张少康, 焦峰. 黄土丘陵区不同退耕年限草地群落特征及其土壤水分养分效应[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(10):31-39.
[20] 王春燕, 燕霞, 顾梦鹤. 黄土高原弃耕地植被演替及其对土壤养分动态的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(11):26-35.
[21] 韩国忠, 于博威, 刘高焕, 等. 晋西黄土区不同退耕年限刺槐林对土壤水分和养分的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018, 38(5):15-20.
[22] 王俊, 李凤民, 贾宇, 等. 半干旱黄土区苜蓿草地轮作农田土壤氮、磷和有机质变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(3):439-444.
[23] 王思成, 王月玲, 许浩, 等. 半干旱黄土丘陵区不同植被恢复方式下土壤理化特性及相关分析[J]. 西北农业学报, 2009, 18(1):295-299.
[24] 王国梁, 刘国彬, 许明祥, 等. 黄土丘陵区纸坊沟流域植被恢复的土壤养分效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2002, 22(1):1-5.
[25] 李嘉珏, 于洪波. 甘肃黄土高原立地分类与适地适树[M]. 北京: 北京科学技术出版社, 1990.
[26] 兰志龙, 赵英, 张建国, 等. 陕北黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式下土壤碳剖面分布特征[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(1):339-347.
[27] 王月玲, 马璠, 许浩, 等. 宁南山区不同年限撂荒梯田土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 26(6):25-31.
[28] 龚月月, 朱新萍, 李典鹏, 等. 不同土地利用方式下干旱区湿地土壤活性有机碳组分特征[J]. 草业科学, 2019, 36(8):1944-1952.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉