欢迎访问林草资源研究

Forest and Grassland Resources Research >

2017 , Vol. 0 >Issue 3: 41 - 45

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.03.009

Scientific Research

Decision Making of Forest Management under Carbon Sink—a Case Study of Chinese Fir Forest in Jiangxi

  • Weiqiang ZHU ,
  • Lei GU
Expand
  • 1. School of Economics and Management,Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University,Lin'an,Zhejiang 31300,China
    2. Zhejiang Province Farmer Development Research Center,Lin'an,Zhejiang 311300,China
    3. Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Carbon Cycling in Forest Ecosystem Carbon Sequestration,Lin'an,Zhejiang 311300,China

Received date: 2017-03-08

  Revised date: 2017-04-19

  Online published: 2020-09-24

Fold

Abstract

Based on Chinese Fir Growth Model and the improved model of Faustmann-Hartman,Chinese fir in Jiangxi Province was taken for the research object to compare LEV and optimal rotation period of Chinese fir under different sites,different carbon prices and different interest rates.The results show that due to the current wood prices far higher than the price of carbon sinks,composite target under the carbon sink forest management does not change the Chinese fir optimal rotation period and the carbon price does not affect Chinese fir optimal rotation obviously,and the interest rates and Cunninghamialanceolata optimal rotation turn into negative correlation.At the same time,the expected value of Chinese fir forest based on carbon sink management is larger than that of single objective,and the expected value of forest land is increasing rapidly,which means that the investment management of carbon sink forest can be considered in the process of forest management.

Key words： optimal rotation period; forestland expected value; forest carbon sinks; Chinese fir

Cite this article

Weiqiang ZHU , Lei GU . Decision Making of Forest Management under Carbon Sink—a Case Study of Chinese Fir Forest in Jiangxi[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2017 , 0(3) : 41 -45 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.03.009

References

[1] 国家林业局. 第八次全国林业资源清查数据[J]. 林业资源管理, 2014(1):1-2.
[2] Shimanoto C Y, Paulo C B, Marcia C M M. How much carbon is sequestered during the restoration of tropical forest? Estimates from tree species in the Brazilian Atlantic forest[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014,329:1-9.
[3] Skutsch M M. Reducing carbon transaction costs in community based forest management[J]. Climate Policy, 2005,5(4):433-443.
[4] Richard G. Newell.Clinate change and forest sinks factors affecting the cost of carbon sequestration[J]. Journal of Environmental Econamics and Management, 2000,40:211-235.
[5] Hoen H F, Solberg B. Potential and econmic efficiency of carbon sequestration in forest biomass through silvicultural management[J]. Forest Science, 1994,40(3):429-451.
[6] Kaipainen T, Lariki J, Pussinen A, et al. Managing carbon sinks by changing votation length in European forests[J]. Enviromental Science & Policy, 2004(7):205-219.
[7] Peckham S D, Gower S T, Perry C H, et al. Modeling harvest and biomass removal effects on the forest carbon balance of the midwest USA[J]. Enviromental Science & Policy, 2013(25):22-35.
[8] 朱臻, 沈月琴, 吴伟光, 等. 碳汇目标下农户森林经营最优决策及碳汇供给能力——基于浙江和江西两省调查[J]. 生态学报, 2013,33(8):2577-2585.
[9] 周伟, 高岚. 森林碳汇收益的实证分析——以广东省杉木林为例[J]. 科技管理研究, 2015(2):219-223.
[10] 黄宰胜, 陈钦. 基于造林成本法的林业碳汇成本收益影响因素分析[J]. 资源科学, 2016,38(3):485-492.
[11] 简盖元, 冯亮明, 刘伟平. 基于碳汇价值的森林最优轮伐期分析[J]. 林业经济问题, 2011,31(1):70-75.
[12] 周国模, 姜培坤. 毛竹林的碳密度和碳贮量及其空间分布. 林业科学, 2004,40(6):20-24.
[13] 陈则生. 杉木人工林经济成熟龄的研究[J]. 林业经济问题, 2010,30(1):22-26.
[14] 沈月琴, 张耀启, 王枫, 等. 中国南方杉木森林碳汇供给潜力的经济分析[J]. 林业科学, 2013,49(9):140-147.
[15] 余光英. 中国碳汇林业可持续发展及博弈机制研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2010.
[16] 朱瑧, 沈月琴, 吴伟光, 等. 碳汇目标下农户森林经营最优决策及碳汇供给能力研究[J]. 生态学报, 2013,33(8):2577-2585.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉