欢迎访问林草资源研究

Forest and Grassland Resources Research >

2019 , Vol. 0 >Issue 2: 30 - 38

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.02.005

Integrated Management and Administration

A 5-year Cross-section Health-data Based Ecological Restoration Assessment of Huangshui National Wetland Park in Xining City,Qinghai Province

  • Zhifa ZHANG ,
  • Xiaojun LIU ,
  • Xufeng MAO ,
  • Xiaoyan WEI
Expand
  • 1. Huangshui National Wetland Park Management Center,Xining 810000,Qinghai,P.R.China
    2. Qinghai Key Laboratory of Natural Geography and Environmental Process,School of Geography Science,Qinghai Normal University,Xining 810000,Qinghai,P.R.China
    3. Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability
    4. School of Economics and Management,Qinghai Normal University,Xining 810000,Qinghai,P.R.China

Received date: 2019-01-29

  Revised date: 2019-04-07

  Online published: 2020-09-22

Fold

Abstract

Wetland health is an important indicator reflecting the overall state of the wetland ecosystem,which provides an important basis for wetland restoration and scientific management.Taking the Qinghai Xining Huangshui National Wetland Park (HNWP) in western China as the research object,this paper constructs a Comprehensive Health Index (CHI) that consists of 20 indicators from ecological environment,service function and social environment,and evaluates the health status after the implementation of the wetland restoration and restoration project after 5 years.Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Expert Consultation Method (ECM) were utilized to determine the weight of each index.Based on field data,experimental data and questionnaire data collected from wetland areas of HNWP in 2013 and 2018,Net Variation Value (NVV) was applied to evaluate the ecological restoration effect of the sampling area.Results showed an obvious improvement from Normal status (0.45) in 2013 to Good status (0.76) in 2018.The CHIs for Haihu Wetland,Xigang Wetland,Ning Lake and Huoshaogou Wetland are 0.76 (Good),0.68 (Good),0.63 (Good) and 0.56 (Normal),respectively.The largest improvement appeared in functional indicators (NVV=0.17) and the least improvement appeared in eco-environmental indicators (NVV=0.07). The above research provides an important basis for the future differentiation and precise management of the wetland park.

Key words： restoration assessment; comprehensive health index; Huangshui National Wetland Park

Cite this article

Zhifa ZHANG , Xiaojun LIU , Xufeng MAO , Xiaoyan WEI . A 5-year Cross-section Health-data Based Ecological Restoration Assessment of Huangshui National Wetland Park in Xining City,Qinghai Province[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2019 , 0(2) : 30 -38 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.02.005

References

[1] 周华荣. 干旱区湿地多功能景观研究的意义与前景分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2005,28(11):6-20.
[2] 张庆辉, 赵捷, 朱晋, 等. 中国湿地公园研究现状[J]. 湿地科学, 2013,11(1):129-135.
[3] 国家林业局. 中国湿地保护行动计划[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2000.
[4] 崔保山, 杨志峰. 湿地生态系统健康研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2001,20(3):31-36.
[5] 马梓文, 张明祥. 从《湿地公约》第12次缔约方大会看国际湿地保护与管理的发展趋势[J]. 湿地科学, 2015,13(5):523-527.
[6] Rapport D J. What Constitutes Ecosystem Health?[J]. Perspectives in Biology & Medicine, 1989,33(1):120-132.
[7] Rapport D J, Costanza R, Mcmichael A J. Assessing ecosystem health[J]. Trends in Ecology&Evolution, 1998,13(10):397-402.
[8] 赵士洞, 张永民. 生态系统评估的概念、内涵及挑战——介绍《生态系统与人类福利:评估框架》[J]. 地球科学进展, 2004,19(4):650-657.
[9] Allen E. Forest health assessment in Canada[J]. Ecosystem Health, 2001,7(1):28-34.
[10] Stolte K W. 1996 National Technical report on forest health[R]. Washington DC:USDA Forest Service, 1997.
[11] Tait J T P, Cresswell I D, Lawson R, et al. Auditing the health of Australia’s ecosystems[J]. Ecosystem Health, 2006,6(2):149-163.
[12] Wrona F J, Cash K J. The ecosystem approach to environmental assessment:moving from theory to practice[J]. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health, 1996,5(2):89-97.
[13] 尚忆初. 美国环境科学研究展望(1977—1981)第二节研究规划一、健康和生态影响规划[J]. 环境科学研究, 1978 (2):8-26.
[14] 席北斗, 霍守亮, 陈奇, 等. 美国水质标准体系及其对我国水环境保护的启示[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2011,34(5):100-120.
[15] Goforth R R. Local and landscape-scale relations between stream communities,stream habitat,and terrestrial land cover properties[D].Lthaca, New York:Cornel University, 1999.
[16] Sonstegard R A, Leatherland J F. Great lakes coho salmon as an indicator organism for ecosystem health[J]. Marine Environmental Research, 1984,14(1-4):480-480.
[17] 欧阳志云, 王如松. 生态系统服务与功能、生态价值与可持续发展[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2000,22(5):45-50.
[18] 尹华君, 刘庆. 森林生态系统健康诊断研究进展及亚高山针叶林健康诊断的思考[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2003,25(5):56-61.
[19] 杨永兴. 国际湿地科学研究的特点、进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2002,21(2):111-120.
[20] 齐丹坤, 李晓, 张怀, 等. 基于古林法的伊春林区不同等级森林生态区位测度研究[J]. 林业经济问题, 2014,34(2):145-148.
[21] 徐蔼婷. 德尔菲法的应用及其难点[J]. 中国统计, 2006 (9):57-59.
[22] 邓雪, 李家铭, 曾浩健, 等. 层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2012,42(7):93-100.
[23] 国家林业局. 中国湿地资源·青海卷[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2015.
[24] 马广仁, 鲍达明, 曹春香, 等. 中国国际重要湿地生态系统评价[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.
[25] 毛旭锋, 崔丽娟, 张曼胤. 基于PSR模型的乌梁素海生态系统健康分区评价[J]. 湖泊科学, 2013,2(6):950-958.
[26] 钱逸凡, 楼毅, 初映雪, 等. 洞庭湖国际重要湿地生态系统健康和价值评价[J]. 湿地科学, 2016,14(4):516-523.
[27] 任宪友, 吴胜军. 洪湖湿地综合评价研究[J]. 国土资源科技管理, 2007,24(5):95-99.
[28] 环境保护部科技标准司. GB 3838-2002,地标水环境质量标准 [S].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
[29] Hakanson L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control:a sedimentological approach[J]. Water Research, 1980,14(8):975-1001.
[30] 徐争启. 潜在生态危害指数法评价中重金属毒性系数计算[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2008,31(2):112-115.
[31] 戴万宏, 黄耀, 武丽, 等. 中国土壤地带性有机质含量与酸碱度的关系[J]. 土壤学报, 2009,5(1):851-860.
[32] 樊燕, 武伟, 刘洪斌. 土壤重金属与土壤理化性质的空间变异及研究[J]. 西南师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2007,32(4):58-63.
[33] 杜岩功, 崔骁勇, 许庆民, 等. 青海省三江源地区草地土壤有机质与砷含量空间分别特征[J]. 中国草地科学, 2012,34(5):24-29.
[34] 吕宪国. 湿地生态系统观测方法[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2004.
[35] 中国环境保护部. HJ 623-2011,区域生物多样性评价标准[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2011.
[36] 薛亮, 赵振斌, 延军平. 西安市灞河湿地鸟类生境构成与保护价值评价研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2008,22(8):116-119.
[37] 全国土壤普查办公室. 中国土壤普查技术[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1992.
[38] 郭凤鸣, 成金华. 层次分析法判断矩阵一致性检验及偏差修正方法研究[J].中国国土资源经济, 1997(7):19-24.
[39] 麦少芝, 徐颂军, 潘颖君. PSR模型在湿地生态系统健康评价中的应用[J]. 热带雨林, 2005,25(4):317-321.
[40] 陈俐交, 宗勇军, 邵秘华, 等. 双台子河口湿地植被修复生境健康评价方法研究[J]. 环境工程, 2017,35(2):158-162.
[41] 张巍. 湿地公园生态恢复方法探讨——以湖北浮桥河国家级湿地公园为例[J].林业资源管理, 2018(3):35-39.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉