欢迎访问林草资源研究

Forest and Grassland Resources Research >

2019 , Vol. 0 >Issue 6: 97 - 100

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.06.017

Scientific Research

A Comparison of Fresh Leaves Combustibility of 12 Landscaping Tree Species in Kunming Area

  • Kunlun WANG ,
  • Xiaofei HOU ,
  • Ting JIANG ,
  • Ruijie MA ,
  • Qiuhua WANG ,
  • Shiyou LI
Expand
  • 1. Fire Research Institute,School of Civil Engineering,Southwest Forestry University,Kunming,Yunnan 650224
    2. Key Laboratory of Forest Disaster Warning and Control in Yunnan Province,Kunming,Yunnan 650224
    3. Shanxi Longcaoping Forestry and Grassland Bureau,Yangling,Shanxi 712100
    4. Forestry and Grassland Bureau of Jiangchuan county,Jiangchuan,Yunnan 652600

Received date: 2019-10-20

  Revised date: 2019-11-06

  Online published: 2020-05-09

Fold

Abstract

In order to compare the combustibility of fresh leaves of different landscaping tree species,the moisture content,calorific value,extract content and ash content of fresh leaves of 12 landscaping tree species in Kunming area were measured experimentally.The combusting properties of fresh leaves were evaluated by multivariate statistical method and systematic clustering method.The analysis showed that the combustibility of fresh leaves of 12 woody plants was in order from large to small: Osmanthus fragrans, Eucalyptus robusta,Machilus yunnanensis,Cyclobalanopsis glaucoides,Cinnamomum glanduliferum,Podocarpus nagi, Eucalyptus globulus,Photinia glomerata,Photinia fraseri,Cinnamomum burmanni,Eriobotrya japonica,Magnolia delavayi.There are 5 types of flammable,6 types of combustible and 1 type of difficult-flammable.This is conclusion that it can provide reference for urban forest fire prevention.

Key words： Kunming area; fresh leaves; physical and chemical factors; combustibility

Cite this article

Kunlun WANG , Xiaofei HOU , Ting JIANG , Ruijie MA , Qiuhua WANG , Shiyou LI . A Comparison of Fresh Leaves Combustibility of 12 Landscaping Tree Species in Kunming Area[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2019 , 0(6) : 97 -100 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.06.017

References

[1] 李世友, 赵家刚, 张雨瑶, 等. 滇中地区11种森林木本植物活叶片抗火性能[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2015,34(5):25-30.
[2] 刘菲, 胡海清. 森林可燃物理化性质与燃烧性的研究综述[J]. 森林防火, 2005(1):28-30.
[3] 张景群, 康永祥, 徐钊. 秦岭松科常绿种叶燃烧性排序[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2001,29(4):16-17.
[4] 单延龙, 李华, 其其格. 黑龙江大兴安岭主要树种燃烧性及理化性质的实验分析[J]. 火灾科学, 2003,12(2):74-78.
[5] 胡海清. 大兴安岭主要森林可燃物理化性质测定与分析[J]. 森林防火, 1995(1):27-31.
[6] 王晓丽, 牛树奎, 阚振国. 北京地区主要树种理化性质研究及易燃性初步分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2008(4):83-88.
[7] 包艳丽, 牛树奎, 孙国庆, 等. 阿尔泰山主要林型燃烧性研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2010,24(4):134-137.
[8] 梁瀛, 张思玉, 努尔古丽, 等. 天山中部林区主要树种理化性质及燃烧性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2011,47(12):101-105.
[9] Engstrom J D, Butler J K, Smith S G, et al. Ignition behavior of live California Chaparral leaves[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2004,176(9):1577-1591.
[10] Dibble A C, White R H, Lebow P K. Combustion characteristics of north-eastern USA vegetation tested in the cone calorimeter:invasive versus non-invasive plants[J]. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2007,16(4):426-443.
[11] Clarke P J, Prior L D, French B J, et al. Using a rainforest-flame forest mosaic to test the hypojournal that leaf and litter fuel flammability is under natural selection[J]. Oecologia, 2014,176(4):1123-1133.
[12] 李世友, 李小宁, 罗文彪. 等. 20种园林绿化树种活枝叶的燃烧性研究[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2008,35(4):490-493.
[13] 张雨瑶, 周劲峰, 李路良, 等. 昆明地区11种园林木本植物新叶片燃烧性分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2013(6):144-147.
[14] 钟安建, 邹璐, 叶清, 等. 南昌城区15种园林树种的抗火性研究[J]. 福建林业科技, 2010,3(4):62-64.
[15] 何忠华, 叶清, 钟安建, 等. 南昌郊区园林树种抗火性研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010,38(33):18976-18978.
[16] 戴开结, 何方, 沈有信, 等. 低磷胁迫下云南松幼苗的生物量及其分配[J]. 广西植物, 2006,26(2):183-186.
[17] 戴开结, 何方, 沈有信, 等. 不同磷源对云南松幼苗生长和磷吸收量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009,29(8):4078-4083.
[18] 宁海龙, 宋秀吉, 王雪依, 等. 氮磷钾肥对大豆脂肪含量的效应[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2007,29(3):302-307.
[19] 赵小铭, 宋秀吉, 王雪依, 等. 高油大豆东农46号脂肪含量的氮磷钾肥效应回归模型[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007(7):332-336.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉