欢迎访问林草资源研究

Forest and Grassland Resources Research >

2018 , Vol. 0 >Issue 2: 48 - 57

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2018.02.010

Scientific Research

Classification and Quality Evaluation of Forest Site Types by Using Compartments as the Research Scale

  • Lihua LU ,
  • Yiming FENG ,
  • You NONG ,
  • Hua LI ,
  • Liangshu NONG ,
  • Dongjing SUN ,
  • Dewei HUANG ,
  • Angang MING
Expand
  • 1. Experimental Center of Tropical Forestry,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Pingxiang 532600,Guangxi,China,
    2. Guangxi Youyiguan Forest Ecosystem Research Station,Pingxiang 532600,Guangxi,China
    3. Institute of Desertification Studies,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Beijing 100091,China

Received date: 2017-12-18

  Revised date: 2018-04-20

  Online published: 2020-09-22

Fold

Abstract

Sampling plots with a density of 7hm 2/plot were distributed and set up based on the results of National Forest Resource Inventory in the Shaoping Experimental Station of Experimental Center of Tropical Forestry,Chinese Academy of Forestry in Guangxi,China.After previous site selection on the forest map,site investigations and plot setting were conducted for acquisition of site properties.the site types classification guiding factors were found out through the Principal Components Analysis method.According to the “Six-level classification system” from “Forest site classification in China”,the data from field study were overlaid in the ArcGIS software to obtain forest site types and related figures,and the site quality was evaluated through comprehensive evaluation method.Results showed that there were 88 site types which were included in 2 blocks and 3 groups in the study area,being pertained to 5 levels of site quality as follows Level I:none;Level II:4 site types with total area of 48.87 hm 2,accounting for 1.44%;Level III:11 site types with total area of 106.42 hm 2,accounting for 3.14%;level IV:52 site types with total area of 2799.21 hm 2,accounting for 82.65%;and level V:19 site types with total area of 432.36 hm 2,accounting for12.77%.There were 15 site types with the site quality level of middle or above,accounting for a total area of 155.29 hm 2or 4.58% in the whole study area,while the site type with the site quality level being low or lower was 73 with the area of 3 231.57 hm 2 accounting for 95.42%.

Key words： compartment scale; site type classification; site quality evaluation; site index; fertility index

Cite this article

Lihua LU , Yiming FENG , You NONG , Hua LI , Liangshu NONG , Dongjing SUN , Dewei HUANG , Angang MING . Classification and Quality Evaluation of Forest Site Types by Using Compartments as the Research Scale[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2018 , 0(2) : 48 -57 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2018.02.010

References

[1] 沈国舫. 森林培育学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2001.
[2] Skovsgarrd J P, Vanclay J K. Forest site productivity:a review of the evolution of dendrometric concepts for even-aged stands[J]. forestry, 2008,81(1):13-31.
[3] 李艳洁, 周来, 靳爱仙, 等. 东京城林业局落叶松人工林立地质量评价[J].林业资源管理, 2017(2):53-57.
[4] 徐罗, 亢新刚, 郭韦韦, 等. 天然云冷杉针阔混交林立地质量评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016,38(5):11-22.
[5] Charles J E, John H T. Site quality evaluation of loblolly pine on the South Carolina Lower Coastal Plain,USA[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2008,19(3):187-192.
[6] Curt T, Bouchard M, Agrech G. Predicting site index of Douglas-fir plantations from ecological variables in the Massif Central area of France[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2001,149(1/2/3):61-74.
[7] 范金顺, 高兆蔚, 蔡元晃, 等. 福建省森林立地分类与质量评价[J].林业勘察设计, 2012(1):1-5.
[8] 杜健, 梁坤南, 周再知, 等. 云南西双版纳柚木人工林立地类型划分及评价[J]. 林业科学, 2016,52(9):1-10.
[9] 张复礼. 宿松县森林立地类型的划分和评价[J].安徽林业科技, 2004(2):10-11.
[10] 余其芬, 唐德瑞, 董有福. 基于遥感与地理信息系统的森林立地分类研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2003,18(2):87-90.
[11] 孟宪宇. 测树学[M].3版. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2006: 98-112.
[12] 顾云春, 李永武, 杨承栋. 森林立地分类与评价的立地要素原理与方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1993.
[13] 杨文姬, 王秀茹. 国内立地质量评价研究浅析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2004,11(3):289-292.
[14] 丰绪霞, 刘兆刚, 张海玉, 等. 基于RS和GIS帽儿山林场森林立地分类及质量评价[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010,38(8):27-30.
[15] 王永昌, 张金池. 基于遥感技术的云台山立地分类及质量评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2007,31(1):85-89.
[16] 汪炳根, 卢立华. 广西大青山实验基地森林立地评价与适地适树研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 1998,1(4):78-85.
[17] 李志先, 邓绍林. 林朵林场杉木立地分类及质量评价研究[J]. 广西农业大学学报, 1995,14(3):230-234.
[18] 黄国胜, 马炜, 王雪军, 等. 基于一类清查数据的福建省立地质量评价技术[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2014,36(3):1-8.
[19] 何瑞珍, 孟庆法, 刘志术, 等. 基于RS和GIS技术的森林立地类型分类研究——以河南省商城县国营黄柏山林场为例[J]. 河南科学, 2010,28(7):799-803.
[20] 巩垠熙, 高原, 仇琪, 等. 基于遥感影像的神经网络立地质量评价研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2013,33(10):42-47.
[21] 张晓丽, 游先祥. 应用“3S”技术进行北京市森林立地分类和立地质量评价的研究[J]. 遥感学报, 1998,2(4):292-295.
[22] 卢立华, 何日明, 农瑞红, 等. 灰木莲生长对土壤养分和气候因子的响应. 应用生态学报, 2014,25(4):961-966.
[23] 詹昭宁, 王国祥, 李芬兰, 等. 中国森林立地分类.北京: 中国林业出版社, 1995.
[24] Meng Shawnx, Huang Shongming, Yang Yuqing, et al. Evalution of population-averaged and subject-specific approaches for modeling the dominant or co-dominant height of lodgepole pine trees[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2009,39(6):1148-1158.
[25] 骆伯胜, 钟继洪, 陈俊坚. 土壤肥力数值化综合评价研究. 土壤, 2004,36(1):104-106.
[26] 阚文杰, 吴启堂. 一个定量综合评价土壤肥力的方法初探. 土壤通报, 1994,25(6):245-247.
[27] 吴玉红, 田霄鸿, 同延安 .等. 基于主成分分析的土壤肥力综合指数评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2010,29(1):173-180.
[28] 刘世平, 陈后庆, 聂新涛, 等. 稻麦两熟制不同耕作方式与秸秆还田土壤肥力的综合评价. 农业工程学报, 2008,24(5):51-56.
[29] 王建国, 杨林章. 模糊数学在土壤质量评价中的应用研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2001,38(2):176-183.
[30] 高慧璇. 应用多元统计分析[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2005.
[31] 秦国峰. 马尾松地理种源[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2003.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉