欢迎访问林草资源研究

Forest and Grassland Resources Research >

2018 , Vol. 0 >Issue 2: 24 - 28

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2018.02.005

Integrated Management and Administration

Current Status and Research Progress of Coastal Tidal Flat Wetlands in China

  • Jing LI ,
  • Yinru LEI ,
  • Lijuan CUI ,
  • Xu PAN ,
  • Xiaodong ZHANG ,
  • Manyin ZHANG ,
  • Wei LI
Expand
  • 1. The Institute of Wetland Research,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Beijing 100091,China
    2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecological Function and Restoration,Beijing 100091,China
    3. Beijing Hanshiqiao National Wetland Ecosystem Research Station,Beijing 101399,China

Received date: 2018-01-22

  Revised date: 2018-04-08

  Online published: 2020-09-22

Fold

Abstract

As an essential ecological barrier for the eastern cities,tidal flat wetlands provide a series of ecological services for coastal households,including biodiversity maintenance,water purification,carbon sequestration,resource provision,tourism and culture.However,due to the increasingly intensive human impacts,tidal flat wetlands are exposed to bottleneck problems such as resource constraint,environment pollution,and ecological function degradation.This paper firstly analyzes the current status of tidal flat wetlands in China,and then reviews the relative research progress from the following aspects:(1) the impacts of human activities on the key processes and functions of coastal tidal flat wetlands;(2) the technologies of ecological function restoration and promotion for coastal tidal flat wetlands;and (3) the resource industrialization and ecological management of coastal tidal flat wetlands.The paper finally identifies the gaps for future research on the degradation mechanism,technology development and resource utilization of coastal wetlands.

Key words： tidal flat wetlands; key processes and functions; technologies of ecological function restoration and promotion; resource industrialization; ecological management

Cite this article

Jing LI , Yinru LEI , Lijuan CUI , Xu PAN , Xiaodong ZHANG , Manyin ZHANG , Wei LI . Current Status and Research Progress of Coastal Tidal Flat Wetlands in China[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2018 , 0(2) : 24 -28 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2018.02.005

References

[1] 牟晓杰, 刘兴土, 阎百兴, 等. 中国滨海湿地分类系统[J]. 湿地科学. 2015,13(1):19~ 26.
[2] 李伟, 崔丽娟, 赵欣胜, 等. 中国滨海湿地及其生态系统服务功能研究概述[J]. 林业调查规划. 2014,39(4):24-30.
[3] Liu Jin’e, Zhou Hongxia, Qin Pei, et al. Comparisons of ecosystem services among three conversion systems in Yancheng National Nature Reserve. Ecological Engineering, 2009,35(5):609-629.
[4] Beaumont N J, Jones L, Garbutt A, et al. The value of carbon sequestration and storage in coastal habitats[J]. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 2014,137(1):32-40.
[5] 张晓龙, 李培英, 李萍, 等. 中国滨海湿地研究现状与展望[J]. 海洋科学进展. 2005,23(1):87-95.
[6] 徐东霞, 章光新. 人类活动对中国滨海湿地的影响及其保护对策[J]. 湿地科学. 2007,5(3):282-288.
[7] Davis T J. The Ramsar Convention manual:a guide to the convention on wetlands of international importance especially as waterfowl habitat[Z].Gland (Switzerland) Ramsar Convention Bureau, 1994.
[8] Lowry G V, Espinasse B P, Badireddy A R, et al. Long-term transformation and fate of manufactured Ag nanoparticles in a simulated large scale freshwater emergent wetland[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2012,46(13):7027-7036.
[9] Winton RS, Richardson CJ. Top-down control of methane emission and nitrogen cycling by waterfowl[J]. Ecology, 2017,98:265-277.
[10] Sthilaire F, Wu J, Roulet N T, et al. McGill wetland model:evaluation of a peatland carbon simulator developed for global assessments[J]. Biogeosciences, 2010,7:3517-3530.
[11] Wu J, Roulet N T, Sagerfors J, et al. Simulation of six years of carbon fluxes for a sedge-dominated oligotrophic minerogenic peatland in Northern Sweden using the McGill Wetland Model (MWM)[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Biogeosciences, 2013,118(2):795-807.
[12] 李凯, 崔丽娟, 李伟, 等. 辽宁双台河口湿地能值评价[J]. 湿地科学与管理. 2015,11(4):9-12.
[13] 赵欣胜, 崔丽娟, 康晓明, 等. 基于能值分析的辽宁双台河口湿地产品供给价值评价研究[J]. 湿地科学与管理, 2015,11(4):13-15.
[14] 潘旭, 岳兴亮, 崔丽娟, 等. 辽宁双台河口湿地营养物质循环功能价值评价[J]. 湿地科学与管理. 2015,11(4):20-22.
[15] 康晓明, 崔丽娟, 岳兴亮, 等. 黄河三角洲芦苇湿地大气调节价值评价研究[J]. 湿地科学与管理. 2015,11(4), 23-25.
[16] 康晓明, 崔丽娟, 赵欣胜, 等. 辽宁双台河口芦苇湿地固碳价值评价研究[J]. 湿地科学与管理, 2016,12(2):15-18.
[17] 韩大勇, 杨永兴, 杨杨, 等. 湿地退化研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2012,32(4):1293-1307.
[18] 张长宽, 陈欣迪. 海岸带滩涂资源的开发利用与保护研究进展[J].河海大学学报:自然科学版, 2016(1):25-33.
[19] Li Jianguo, Pu Lijie, Zhu Ming, et al.Evolution of soil properties following reclamation in coastal areas:A review[J].Geoderma, 2014,226/227:130-139.
[20] Fang S B, Jia X B, Yang X Y, et al.A method of identifying priority spatial patterns for the management of potential ecological risks posed by heavy metals[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2012,237/238:290-298.
[21] Oleszczuk P, Baran S. Leaching of individual PAHs in soil varies with the amounts of sewage sludge applied and total organic carbon content[J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2005,14(4):491-500.
[22] 巩晋楠, 王开运, 张超, 等. 围垦滩涂湿地旱生耐盐植物的入侵和影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009,20(1):33-39.
[23] 黄翀, 刘高焕, 张海龙, 等. 黄河河口湿地景观变化影响丹顶鹤生境的评价分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2009,11(4):491-497.
[24] Brooks RT. Potential impacts of global climate change on the hydrology and ecology of ephemeral freshwater systems of the forests of the northeastern United States[J]. Climatic Change, 2009,95(3/4):469-483.
[25] 刘志杰, 李培英, 张晓龙, 等. 黄河三角洲滨海湿地表层沉积物重金属区域分布及生态风险评价[J]. 环境科学. 2012,33(4):1182-1188.
[26] 于君宝, 阚兴艳, 王雪宏, 等. 黄河三角洲石油污染对湿地芦苇和碱蓬幼苗生长影响的模拟研究[J]. 地理科学, 2012,32(10):1254-1261.
[27] 李文华, 邵学新, 吴明, 等. 杭州湾潮滩湿地土壤碱性磷酸酶活性分布及其与磷形态的关系[J]. 环境科学学报, 2013,33(12), 3341-3349.
[28] 梁威, 邵学新, 吴明, 等. 杭州湾滨海湿地不同植被类型沉积物磷形态变化特征[J]. 生态学报, 2012,32(16):5025-5033.
[29] Fink D F, Mitsch W J. Hydrology and nutrient biogeochemistry in a created river diversion oxbow wetland[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2007,30(2):93-102.
[30] 李俊生, 赵彩云. “主要入侵生物生态危害评估与防制修复技术示范研究” 项目介绍[J]. 生物多样性, 2016,24(10):1200-1200.
[31] 张功宝, 蔡体久, 徐飞. 小兴安岭退化沼泽湿地植被恢复技术[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2014,36(6):112-118.
[32] Cherry J A, Gough L. Trade-offs in plant responses to herbivory influence trophic routes of production in a freshwater wetland[J]. Oecologia, 2009,161(3):549-557.
[33] 赵彩云, 柳晓燕, 白加德, 等. 广西北海西村港互花米草对红树林湿地大型底栖动物群落的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2014,22(5):630-639.
[34] Megonigal J P, Neubauer S C. Biogeochemistry of tidal freshwater wetlands.Coastal wetlands:an integrated ecosystem approach[M]. Elsevier,Amsterdam, 2009: 535-562.
[35] Zedler J B. Progress in wetland restoration ecology[J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2000,15(10):402-407.
[36] 彭少麟, 任海, 张倩媚. 退化湿地生态系统恢复的一些理论问题[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003,14(11):2026-2030.
[37] 崔丽娟, 张岩, 张曼胤, 等. 湿地水文过程效应及其调控技术[J]. 世界林业研究, 2011,24(2):10-14.
[38] 郭岳, 徐清馨, 佟守正, 等. 黄河三角洲滨海湿地退化原因分析及生态修复[J]. 吉林林业科技, 2017,46(5):40-44.
[39] 任葳. 基于微地形营造的黄河三角洲退化滨海湿地修复模式研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古大学, 2017.
[40] Mitsch W J, Li Z, Fink D F, et al. Ecological engineering of floodplains[J]. Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology, 2008,8(2):139-147.
[41] 于丽丽, 牟长城, 顾韩, 等. 火干扰对小兴安岭落叶松-苔草沼泽温室气体排放的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2011,31(18):5180-5191.
[42] 张宏斌, 孟好军, 刘贤德, 等. 甘肃省张掖市黑河流域中游典型退化湿地植被特征及生态恢复技术[J]. 湿地科学, 2012,10(2):194-199.
[43] 徐华林, 彭逸生, 葛仙梅, 等. 基于红树林种植的滨海湿地恢复效果研究[J]. 湿地科学与管理, 2012,8(3):36-39.
[44] Tam N F Y, Guo C L, Yau W Y, et al. Preliminary study on biodegradation of phenanthrene by bacteria isolated from mangrove sediments in Hong Kong[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2002,45(1):316-324.
[45] Fediuc E, Erdei L. Physiological and biochemical aspects of cadmium toxicity and protective mechanisms induced in Phragmites australis and Typha latifolia[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2002,159(3):265-271.
[46] 陈才俊. 围垦对潮滩动物资源环境的影响[J]. 海洋科学, 1990,14(6):48-50.
[47] 宋达泉. 我国海岸带土地、生物资源的开发利用[J]. 自然资源学报, 1988,3(2):114-120.
[48] 陈金干, 韩迪生. 产业化是滩涂资源深度开发的必由之路——大丰市苇鱼养殖场推进产业化的实践和思考[J].盐城师范学院学报:人文社会科学版, 1998(2):127-129.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉