Characteristics of leaf,berry and Photosynthetierate of 5 Different Cultivars of Seabuckthorn in Ulan Buh Desert were analyzed in order to study the adaptability.The results were summarized as follows,the yield of Wulanshalin,Zhongguoshaji and Shenqiuhong is higher than that of other 3 seabuckthorn varieties.With lower stomatal conductance and higher water use efficiency,they have the advantages of big fruit and strong stress resistance,which can be used as the eco economic types for local promotion.
CHENG Hailing
,
LIU Fang
,
Luo Hongmei
,
HAO Yuguang
,
XU Jun
,
DUAN Na
. Study on Characteristics of Leaf and Berry of Different Cultivars of Seabuckthorn in Ulan Buh Desert[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2014
, 0(3)
: 122
-125
.
DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2014.03.027
[1]张建国,黄铨.沙棘生态经济型优良杂种选育[J].林业科学研究,2005,18(4):381-86.
[2]李多伟,王义潮,晋坤贞.中国沙棘营养器官结构特征及其与生境关系的研究[J].西北大学学报:自然科学版,1996,26(3):247-250.
[3]吴林,霍焰,李亚东,等.沙棘叶片组织结构观察与抗旱性的关系研究[J].吉林农业大学学报,2003,25(4):259-263.
[4]何士敏,汪建华,秦家顺.几种沙棘叶片组织结构特点和抗旱性比较[J].林业科技开发,2009,23(1):16-19.
[5]Bierhuizen J F,Slatyer R O.Effect of atmospheric concentration of water vapor and CO2 in determining transpiration-photosynthesis relationship s of cotton leavfes[J].Agricultural Eteorology,1965(2):259-270.
[6]凌侠,武志博,蓝登明,等.中国沙棘与俄罗斯沙棘杂交子代优良单株的早期选育[J].内蒙古农业大学,2007,28(1):66-70.
[7]王国富,李连国,晓燕,等.沙棘叶片表面形态特征与抗旱性的关系[J].园艺学报,2006,33(6):1310-1312.
[8]李代琼,梁一民,黄瑾.半干旱黄土区沙棘形态解剖学特性研究[J].沙棘,2004,3(17):8-13.
[9]赵延霞,骆有庆,宗世祥,等.不同沙棘品种雌雄株叶片解剖结构及抗旱性比较[J].北京林业大学学报,2012,36(4):34-41.
[10]韩刚,李少雄,徐鹏,等.6种灌木叶片解剖结构的抗旱性分析[J].西北林学院学报,2006,21(4):43-46.
[11]李晓燕,王林和,李连国,等.沙棘叶片组织解剖结构与其生态适应性研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(5):209-212.
[12]李代琼,梁一民,黄瑾,等.沙棘的形态解剖学特性研究[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(7):1224-1230.
[13]段宝利.不同种源栓皮栎水分生理生态特性及其对干旱胁迫的适应[D].咸阳:西北农林科技大学,2003.
[14]刘金祥,麦嘉玲,刘家琼.CO2浓度增强对沿阶草光合特性的影响[J].中国草地,2004,26(3):13-18.
[15]郝建辉,石凤翎.不同扁蓿豆材料抗旱性比较研究[J].中国草地学报,2006,28(3):39-42.
