欢迎访问林草资源研究
Scientific Research

Simulation of Soil Moisture Evaporation for Different Types of Bushes in Guizhou Karst Plateau

  • TANG Yupin ,
  • YANG Rui ,
  • DAI Quanhou ,
  • YU Lifei
Expand
  • 1. College of Forestry,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China;
    2. Forestry Policies and Resources Management Station of Bijie,Guizhou 551700,China;
    3. College of Life Science,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China

Received date: 2014-04-25

  Revised date: 2014-05-20

  Online published: 2020-12-09

Abstract

To probe the effect of different plant roots on dynamic change of soil moisture and its evaporation process,soil moisture evaporation under several thickets was compared in Guizhou karst plateau.The results showed that as for the change of soil water holding capacity,roots had no significant difference between Berberis aggregate and Cotoneaster horizontalis var.perpusillus,and the maximum soil water holding capacity was Berberis aggregate=Cotoneaster horizontalis var.perpusillus>Cotoneaster dammerii>no bushes;Soil water holding capacity was reduced with the passage of time gradually but its moisture effect was not consistent for different plant roots.With the change of soil moisture cumulative evaporation,it increased with passage of time gradually but its change was different for different plant roots.10 days of the total soil water evaporation in several bushes had the same change trend with the soil maximum moisture capacity.Based on the exponential function model for soil water characteristic curve in several bushes,there was a good correlation between soil water content and soil moisture evaporation time,and the degree of fitting was higher.

Cite this article

TANG Yupin , YANG Rui , DAI Quanhou , YU Lifei . Simulation of Soil Moisture Evaporation for Different Types of Bushes in Guizhou Karst Plateau[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2014 , 0(3) : 97 -100 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2014.03.021

References

[1]朱守谦.喀斯特森林生态研究(Ⅲ)[M].贵阳:贵州科技出版社,2003:3-10.
[2]熊伟,王彦辉,程积民,等.不同植被覆盖条件下土壤水分蒸发的比较[J].中国水土保持科学,2005,3(3):65-68.
[3]王进鑫,黄宝龙,罗伟祥.局部覆盖条件下干旱过程对土壤水分蒸发的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2004,32(9):106-110.
[4]王慧杰,冯瑞云,张志军,等.不同有机覆盖物对土壤水分蒸发的影响[J].山西农业科学,2009,37(6):42-44.
[5]李新举,张志国.秸秆覆盖对土壤水分蒸发及土壤盐分的影响[J].土壤通报,1999,30(6):257-258.
[6]叶飞飞,孙海龙,李绍才,等.秸秆网厚度及用量对土壤水分蒸发的影响[J].中国水土保持,2011(6):60-63.
[7]邵晓贵,杨瑞.喀斯特地区不同覆盖下土壤水分变化模拟研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(5):250-253.
[8]王宇,叶建仁.保水剂种类及含量对土壤水分蒸发的影响[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2008,32(4):95-97.
[9]邢玉芬,帅修富,李长荣.高吸水性树脂单施及与肥料混施对土壤水分蒸发及团聚作用的影响[J].北京农业大学学报,1993,19(4):52-55.
[10]李宁云,田昆,肖德荣,等.草海保护区功能分区与生态环境变化的关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(3):67-69.
[11]周国富.草海自然保护区土地利用调整之生态经济对策[J].贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版,2001,19(1):1-5.
[12]吴华,张建利,范怡雯,等.草海流域植物群落结构数量分类与排序[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2013,37(3):47-52.
[13]吕殿青,邵明安,潘云.容重变化与土壤水分特征的依赖关系研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(3):209-212.
Outlines

/