欢迎访问林草资源研究
Scientific Research

Relationship between Neighborhood Comparison and Diameter Growth of Secondary Poplar-birch Forest in the Mountains of North Hebei

  • HUANG Longsheng ,
  • HUO Yanling ,
  • JIN Hui ,
  • LI Yongning
Expand
  • 1. School of Forestry,Agricultural University of Hebei,Baoding,Hebei 071000,China;
    2. Forestry Bureau of Fengxiang County,Fengxiang,Shaanxi 721400,China

Received date: 2014-03-24

  Revised date: 2014-06-30

  Online published: 2020-12-09

Abstract

Taking the secondary poplar-birch forest in the mountains of north Hebei as test objects,the reference tree and 4 closest neighboring trees as the spatial structure unit,the width of the tree ring is used for determining the diameter growth to study the relationship between neighborhood comparison and diameter growth.The results show that the most competitive time of the forest trees is 10~20a,which is the best time to manage the forest stand and readjust the density.The reason for formation of Betula platyphylla neighborhood comparison mainly depends on the conditions of the forest growth at its early stage and their competitive ability.Compared with the three neighborhood comparisons,the dominant trees grow better,the middle trees have no obvious growth advantage to the bad state trees.The lower the advantage of the trees is,the lower the relationship between diameter growth and external environment condition is.

Cite this article

HUANG Longsheng , HUO Yanling , JIN Hui , LI Yongning . Relationship between Neighborhood Comparison and Diameter Growth of Secondary Poplar-birch Forest in the Mountains of North Hebei[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2014 , 0(3) : 71 -76 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2014.03.016

References

[1]Pommerening A.Approaches to quantifying forest structures[J].Forestry,2002,75(3):305-324.
[2]Wenk G,Antanaitis V,Smelko S.Waldertragslehre[M].Berlin:Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag,1990.448.
[3]Pommerening A.Evaluating structural indices by reversing forest structural analysis[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2006,224:266-277.
[4]惠刚盈,胡艳波.混交林树种空间隔离程度表达方式的研究[J].林业科学研究,2001,14(1):177-181.
[5]惠刚盈,Von Gadow K,Albert M.尺度:一个描述林木个体分布格局的结构参数[J].林业科学,1999,35(1):37-42.
[6]Von Gadow K,Füldner K.Bestandes be schreibung in der Forsteinrichtung[C].Dessau:Tagungsbericht der Arbeitsgruppe Forsteinrichtung Kliekenb,1992.
[7]惠刚盈,Von Gadow K,Albert M.一个新的林分空间结构参数——大小比数[J].林业科学研究,1999,12(1):1-6.
[8]胡艳波,惠刚盈,戚继忠,等.吉林蛟河天然红松阔叶林的空间结构分析[J].林业科学研究,2003,16(5):523-530.
[9]胡艳波,惠刚盈.优化林分空间结构的森林经营方法探讨[J].林业科学研究,2006,19(1):l-8.
[10]郝云庆,王金锡,王启和,等.柳杉纯林改造后林分空间结构变化预测[J].林业科学,2006,42(8):8-13.
[11]夏富才,赵秀海,潘春芳,等.长白山阔叶红松林林分空间结构[J].应用与环境生物学报,2010,16(4):529-534.
[12]贾秀红,郑小贤.长白山过伐林区云冷杉针阔混交林空间结构分析[J].华中农业大学学报,2006,25(4):435-440.
[13]徐海,惠刚盈,胡艳波.天然红松阔叶林不同径阶林木的空间分布特征分析[J].林业科学研究,2006,19(6):687-691.
[14]梁文俊,丁国栋,包岩峰,等.冀北山地山杨白桦混交林林分空间结构研究[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2012,47(3):85-89.
[15]张思玉,郑世群.笔架山常绿阔叶林优势种群种内种间竞争的数量研究[J].林业科学,2001,37(1):185-188.
[16]DoleNal J,Ishii H,Vetrova V Petal.Tree growth andcompetition in Betula platyphylla-Larix cajanderipost-fire forest in central Kamchatka[J].Annals of Botany,2004,94,333-343.
[17]林勇明,洪滔,吴承祯,等.桂花次生林群落主要树种种间关联及其对混交度的响应[J].应用与环境生物学报,2007,13(3).327-332.
[18]闫家锋,邓送求,周伟,等.空间结构单元的侧柏林群落特征分析[J].东北林业大学学报,2010,38(3):2-7.
[19]武纪成,张会儒,陈新美.金沟岭林场天然混交林空间结构分析[J].西北林学院学报,2008,23(5):178-181.
[20]赵洋毅,王克勤,陈奇伯,等.重庆缙云山自然保护区马尾松阔叶树混交林的空间结构特征[J].林业资源管理,2012(1):49-53.
[21]闫东锋,吴明作,杨喜田.宝天曼国家级自然保护区栎类天然林林分空间结构特征[J].东北林业大学学报,2011,39(9):52-53.
[22]柴一新.天然白桦林的特点与经营[J].东北林业大学学报,2000,28(5):31-34.
Outlines

/