Natural resource evaluation,including forest,is very common now and is expected to be applied in administration management.Conceptual errors commonly exist in the process of forest assets evaluation application in China,which leads to inaccuracy of evaluation results.This paper discusses 5 aspects based on environmental economic accounting,Which include1)the difference between forest assets value and service value,2)forest assets evaluation & services that should conform to international environmental economic accounting,3)natural assets concept and classification,4)ecological system service and 5)differences between assets and services.
WANG Hongwei
,
HOU Yuanzhao
,
HUO Zhenbin
. Discussion on Related Concepts of China Forest Resources Evaluation[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2015
, 0(1)
: 17
-22
.
DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2015.01.003
[1]联合国、世界银行.环境经济综合核算 SEEA-2003[M].丁言强等译,北京:中国经济出版社,2005.
[2]Wu Shuirong,Hou Yuanzhao.Valuation of forest ecosystem goods and services and forest natural capital of the Beijing municipality China[J].FAO Unasylva,2010,234:1-2.
[3]侯元兆 吴水荣.生态系统价值评估理论方法的最新进展及对我国流行概念的斧正[J].世界林业研究,2008(5):7-16.
[4]张永民.生态系统与人类福祉:评估框架[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2006.
[5]Robert Costanza.The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387.
[6]联合国环境规划署.生态系统与生物多样性经济学-让自然资源经济学成为主流(TEEB)[M].Malta Progress Press,2010.
[7]侯元兆,张颖,曹克瑜,等.森林资源核算:理论方法[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2005.
[8]张志强,徐中民,程国栋.生态系统服务与自然资本价值评估[J].生态学报,2001,21(11):175-183.
[9]费里曼.环境与资源价值评估——理论与方法[M].曾贤刚,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
