Forest and Grassland Resources Research >
Study on Countermeasures for Prevention and Control of Illegal Logging Crimes from the Perspective of Ecological Security—An Empirical Analysis Based on 302 Court Verdicts
Received date: 2019-07-13
Revised date: 2019-08-29
Online published: 2020-09-18
In order to effectively curb the continuous high incidence of illegal logging crimes and build prevention and control measures conducive to the construction of ecological civilization,302 cases of illegal logging crime of first instance were studied by empirical analysis method.The main body of crime is mainly young and middle-aged male farmers,most of whom have a junior middle school education.The subjective aspect of crime is to make profits and meet the needs of production and life.The objective aspect of the crime is that there are few cases of illegal cutting of young trees,the average amount of illegal cutting of trees is "huge",but the phenomenon of " light-penalization" is prominent.It is suggested to change the forest value of "emphasizing economic value but ignoring ecological value" from the perspective of understanding,promote forestry ecological poverty alleviation from the perspective of policy,establish the ecological legal interest of criminal law from the perspective of legislation,protect ecological security through multidimensional prevention and control measures,and build a beautiful China.
Zhi WANG , Hongguang LIU . Study on Countermeasures for Prevention and Control of Illegal Logging Crimes from the Perspective of Ecological Security—An Empirical Analysis Based on 302 Court Verdicts[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2019 , 0(5) : 28 -32 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.05.006
| [1] | Fischer J, Lindenmayer D B, Manning A D. Biodiversity,ecosystem function,and resilience:ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2006,4(2):80-86. |
| [2] | Patterson T M, Coelho D L. Ecosystem services:Foundations,opportunities,and challenges for the forest products sector[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009,257(8):1637-1646. |
| [3] | 张高文. 破坏森林资源犯罪案件证据调查规范[M]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 2012. |
| [4] | 张明楷. 刑法学(下)[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2016. |
| [5] | 张树梓, 李梅, 张树彬, 等. 塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林天然更新影响因子[J]. 生态学报, 2015(16):5403-5411. |
| [6] | 黄霞, 唐双娥, 董邦俊. 试析我国林木资源之刑法保护——盗伐林木罪的社会危害性之思考[J]. 现代法学, 2003(8):119-122. |
| [7] | 张华卿. 美化法参与法平民法——论广告中常用的几种宣传方法[J]. 新闻爱好者, 2008(4):50. |
| [8] | 沈茂英, 杨萍. 生态扶贫内涵及其运行模式研究[J]. 农业经济, 2016(7):3-8. |
| [9] | 肖磊. 绿色发展理念下生态扶贫法治保障研究[J]. 法学杂志, 2019(5):39-47. |
| [10] | 安柯颖. 生态刑法的基本问题[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2014. |
| [11] | 简基松. 论生态法益在刑法法益中的独立地位[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2006(5):20-24. |
| [12] | 黄锡生, 张磊. 生态法益与我国传统刑法的现代化[J]. 河北法学, 2009(11):54-58. |
| [13] | 郭会玲. 生态法益视角下破坏森林资源犯罪立法之完善[J]. 林业经济, 2012(8):112-115. |
| [14] | 贝卡利亚. 论犯罪与刑罚[M].黄风,译. 北京: 中国大百科全书出版社, 1993. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |