Research on Forest Loss Assessment Based on Multi-Source Datasets

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2024.06.004

Abstract

Abstract:

Accurate assessment of forest loss is essential to effectively curb forest area loss and guaranteeing the provision of forest ecosystem services.This research systematizes the research progress of forest loss assessment and categorizes principal datasets into forest inventory datasets and satellite remote sensing image datasets.A comprehensive analysis of these datasets reveals the advantages and disadvantages and evaluates the assessment efficacy of different datasets by comparing their limitations as indicated in current studies.Based on these findings,three optimization strategies are proposed.1)Endogenous optimization of the dataset to improve its assessment accuracy.2)Employing dataset fusion techniques to integrate the strengths of multiple datasets for complementary benefits.3)Incorporating geographic information data to enhance the comprehensiveness and accuracy of forest loss assessment.A comprehensive review of datasets for forest loss assessment not only augments the theoretical framework of this research domain but also lays the scientific foundation for efficient conservation and management of forest resources.

Key words: forest loss, forest resource assessment, forest inventory, satellite remote sensing, forest protection

CLC Number:

S718.55

CAI Yingli, ZHU Hongge. Research on Forest Loss Assessment Based on Multi-Source Datasets[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024, (6): 27-34.

Figures/Tables 2

Tab.1

Tab.2

References 48

[1]	HANSEN M C, POTAPOV P V, MOORE R, et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6160):850-853. doi: 10.1126/science.1244693 pmid: 24233722
[2]	王淑静, 赖佩玉, 郝斌飞, 等. 西南地区2001—2019年森林损失特征遥感监测与时空分析[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2021, 36(3):552-563. doi: 10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2021.3.0552
[3]	GAVEAU D L A, SANTOS L, LOCATELLI B, et al. Forest loss in Indonesian New Guinea(2001-2019):Trends,drivers and outlook[J]. Biological Conservation, 2021, 261:109225.
[4]	POTAPOV P V, HANSEN M C, STEHMAN S V, et al. Combining MODIS and Landsat imagery to estimate and map boreal forest cover loss[J]. Remote sensing of environment, 2008, 112(9):3708-3719.
[5]	BARLOW J, LENNOX G, FERREIRA J, et al. Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation[J]. Nature, 2016,535:144-147.
[6]	VAN WEES D, WAN DER WERF G R, RANDERSON J T, et al. The role of fire in global forest loss dynamics[J]. Global change biology, 2021, 27(11):2377-2391. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15591 pmid: 33694227
[7]	FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020[M]. Rome: FAO, 2020.
[8]	ALKAMA R, CESCATTI A. Climate change:Biophysical climate impacts of recent changes in global forest cover[J]. Science, 2016, 351(6273),600-604. doi: 10.1126/science.aac8083 pmid: 26912702
[9]	SWANN A L S, LAGUÊ M M, GARCIA E S, et al. Continental-scale consequences of tree die-offs in North America:Identifying where forest loss matters most[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2018, 13(5),5014.
[10]	DRAKE T W, VAN OOST K, BARTHEL M, et al. Mobilization of aged and biolabile soil carbon by tropical deforestation[J]. Nature geoscience, 2019, 12(7):541-546. doi: 10.1038/s41561-019-0384-9 pmid: 31338120
[11]	PRAVALIE R. Major perturbations in the Earth's forest ecosystems.Possible implications for global warming[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2018,185,544-571.
[12]	LIU Y, PAROLARI A J, KUMAR M, et al. Increasing atmospheric humidity and CO₂ concentration alleviate forest mortality risk[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2017, 114(37):9918-9923.
[13]	LAMBIN E F, GIBBS H K, HEILMAYR R, et al. The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8(2):109-116.
[14]	华文剑, 陈海山, 李兴. 中国土地利用/覆盖变化及其气候效应的研究综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(9):1025-1036. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2014.09.1025
[15]	CHEN W, YIN H, MORIYA K, et al. Retrieval and comparison of forest leaf area index based on remote sensing data from AVNIR-2,Landsat-5 TM,MODIS,and PALSAR sensors[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-information, 2017, 6(6):179.
[16]	张煜星, 王雪军, 黄国胜, 等. 森林面积多阶遥感监测方法[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(7):94-104.
[17]	于兴修, 杨桂山. 中国土地利用/覆被变化研究的现状与问题[J]. 地理科学进展, 2002(1):51-57.
[18]	韩云环, 郑子彦, 肖宇, 等. 基于统计年鉴和MODIS的中国区域土地利用/覆盖变化特征研究[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2017, 22(6):733-746.
[19]	BURIVALOVA Z, BAUERT M R, HASSOLD S, et al. Relevance of global forest change data set to local conservation:Case study of forest degradation in Masoala National Park,Madagascar[J]. Biotropica, 2015, 47(2):267-274.
[20]	邓成, 梁志斌. 国内外森林资源调查对比分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2012(5):12-17.
[21]	ROMIJN E, HEROLD M, KOOISTRA L, et al. Assessing capacities of non-Annex I countries for national forest monitoring in the context of REDD+[J]. Environmental science & policy, 2012,19:33-48.
[22]	李春干, 代华兵. 中国森林资源调查:历史、现状与趋势[J]. 世界林业研究, 2021, 34(6):72-80.
[23]	ILVESSALO Y. The forests of suomi(Finland).Results of general survey of the forests of the country carried out during the years 1921—1924[M]. Helsinki: Communicationes Ex Instituto Quaestionum Forestalium Finlandiae, 1927.
[24]	吴春争, 冯益明, 舒清态, 等. 基于高空间分辨率影像的林业小班遥感区划系统设计与实现[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(1):40-45.
[25]	LISTER A J, ANDERSEN H, FRESCINO T, et al. Use of remote sensing data to improve the efficiency of national forest inventories:A case study from the United States national forest inventory[J]. Forests, 2020, 11(12):1364.
[26]	BINDEWALD A, MIOCIC S, WEDLER A, et al. Forest inventory-based assessments of the invasion risk of Pseudotsuga menziesii(Mirb.)Franco and Quercus rubra L.in Germany[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2021, 140(4):883-899.
[27]	王雪军, 张煜星, 黄国胜, 等. 全国森林面积和森林蓄积年度出数方法探讨[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2016, 38(1):9-18.
[28]	MACDICKEN K G. Global forest resources assessment 2015:What,why and how?[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2015,352:3-8.
[29]	王昊, 吕植, 顾垒, 等. 基于Global Forest Watch观察2000-2013年间中国森林变化[J]. 生物多样性, 2015, 23(5):575-582. doi: 10.17520/biods.2015122
[30]	WHEELER D, GUZDER-WILLIAMS B, PETERSEN R, et al. Rapid MODIS-based detection of tree cover loss[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2018,69:78-87.
[31]	DRUSCH M, DEL BELLO U, CARLIER S, et al. Sentinel-2:ESA's optical high-resolution mission for GMES operational services[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2012,120:25-36.
[32]	LEFSKY M A, COHEN W B, PARKER G G, et al. Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies:Lidar,an emerging remote sensing technology that directly measures the three-dimensional distribution of plant canopies,can accurately estimate vegetation structural attributes and should be of particular interest to forest,landscape,and global ecologists[J]. BioScience, 2002, 52(1):19-30.
[33]	FANKHAUSER K E, STRIGUL N S, GATZIOLIS D. Augmentation of traditional forest inventory and airborne laser scanning with unmanned aerial systems and photogrammetry for forest monitoring[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018,10:1562.
[34]	TINKHAM W T, MAHONEY P R, HUDAK A T, et al. Applications of the United States forest inventory and analysis dataset:A review and future directions[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2018, 48(11):1251-1268.
[35]	朱玮晗, 林金煌, 杨舒棋, 等. 福建省县域森林损失时空演变特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2024, 40(4):499-512.
[36]	SAATCHI S S, HARRIS N L, BROWN S, et al. Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011, 108(24):9899-9904.
[37]	ZENG Z, GOWER D B, WOOD E F. Accelerating forest loss in Southeast Asian Massif in the 21st century:A case study in Nan Province,Thailand[J]. Global change biology, 2018, 24(10):4682-4695.
[38]	ANDREACCI F, MARENZI R C. Accounting for twenty-first-century annual forest loss in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil using high-resolution global maps[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2020, 41(11):4408-4420.
[39]	VELASCO-ACEVES P A, XU C Y, GINZBURG R. Chaco region:Forest loss and fragmentation in the context of the territorial planning law.Remote sensing assessment in Formosa,Argentina application case[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2021,31:e01846.
[40]	TYUKAVINA A, BACCINI A, HANSEN M C, et al. Aboveground carbon loss in natural and managed tropical forests from 2000 to 2012[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2015, 10(7): 074002.
[41]	MILODOWSKI D, MITCHARD E, WILLIAMS M. Forest loss maps from regional satellite monitoring systematically underestimate deforestation in two rapidly changing parts of the Amazon[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2017, 12(9):4003.
[42]	胡杨, 彭道黎, 徐雪蕾. 基于3阶段抽样方法的森林面积估测:以北京市延庆县为例[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2016, 44(9):5-8.
[43]	TROPEK R, SEDLÁCEK O, JAN BECK, et al. Comment on “High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change”[J]. Science, 2014, 344(6187):981-981.
[44]	ALLAN J R, VENTER O, MAXWELL S, et al. Recent increases in human pressure and forest loss threaten many Natural World Heritage Sites[J]. Biological conservation, 2017,206:47-55.
[45]	GRAESSER J, RAMANKUTTY N, COOMES O T. Increasing expansion of large-scale crop production onto deforested land in sub-Andean South America[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2018, 13(8):4021.
[46]	KEENAN R J, REAMS G A, ACHARD F, et al. Dynamics of global forest area:Results from the FAO global forest resources assessment 2015[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2015,352:9-20.
[47]	雷相东, 洪玲霞, 陆元昌, 等. 国家级森林资源清查地面样地设计[J]. 世界林业研究, 2008(4):35-40.
[48]	PARADIS E. Forest gains and losses in Southeast Asia over 27 years:The slow convergence towards reforestation[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2021,122:102332.

数据集类型	代表数据集	优点	缺点
森林资源清查数据集	FRA、各国森林资源清查数据集	1)数据详细具体 2)信息易获得,公开透明 3)数据标准和方法统一,便于比较	1)时间滞后,更新周期较长 2)数据精度相对较低,难以捕捉小规模变化 3)成本较高
卫星遥感影像数据集	GFC数据集、MODIS数据集、Sentinel系列数据	1)覆盖广泛,提供广泛的地理空间信息 2)高分辨率,能捕捉细致变化 3)时间序列数据,可用于长期监测 4)部分数据可免费获取,成本较低	1)受天气因素影响,可能导致数据缺失 2)自动分类算法在复杂地区易误分类 3)需要专业知识进行图像处理和解释

研究尺度	研究区域	数据来源	研究结论	相关文献
宏观	非洲、拉丁美洲、南亚和东南亚	Landsat和MODIS数据	非洲、东南亚和中美洲等地区的森林损失动态比巴西和东南亚岛屿更精细,基于样本的森林损失估计高于基于地图的估计	Tyukavina等^[40]
	中国	森林资源清查和MODIS 的数据	统计年鉴和MODIS森林覆盖率的空间分布具有较高的一致性,但个别省(区、市)年鉴数据森林面积增加量明显高于MODIS的变化	韩云环等^[18]
	巴西	SOSMA和GFC数据	GFC数据反映的森林损失面积明显高于巴西官方绘制的SOSMA地图,且GFC数据存在植树造林、森林更新和草地的分类错误	Andreacci等^[38]
微观	巴西的阿克里省和朗多尼亚省	GFC、PRODES和FORMA数据	政府统计的森林损失数据要显著低于GFC数据,但GFC数据对小范围(<2 hm²)森林损失也会产生严重低估	Milodowski等^[41]
微观	中国西南地区	GFC、数字高程模型(Digital Elevation Model,DEM)、航天飞机雷达地形测绘任务数据(Shuttle Radar Topography Mission,SRTM)和更精细的全球土地覆盖观测和监测数据(Finer Resolution Observation and Monitoring of Global Land Cover,FROM-GLC)	国家森林资源清查的时效性不强,森林损失现象逐渐向海拔较低、坡度较缓的地方转移	王淑静等^[2]