欢迎访问林草资源研究
科学研究

窄冠福建柏与福建柏不同生长阶段构型差异分析

  • 黄云鹏 ,
  • 范繁荣 ,
  • 苏松锦 ,
  • 王邦富 ,
  • 周东雄 ,
  • 吴建林
展开
  • 1.福建三明林业学校,福建 三明 365001;
    2.泉州师范学院 资源与环境学院,福建 泉州 362000;
    3.三明市林业科技推广中心,福建 三明 365000;
    4.三明市三元区林业局,福建 三明 365000
黄云鹏(1964-),男,福建邵武人,教授级高工,主要从事森林培育学的研究工作。Email:hyp1234888@126.com

网络出版日期: 2020-11-20

基金资助

福建省科技厅重点项目(2013N0009);福建三明林业学校科研项目(SMLX2013-10)

Architectural Analysis of Fokienia hodginsii and Its Variant Types at Different Growth Stages

  • HUANG Yunpeng ,
  • FAN Fanrong ,
  • SU Songjin ,
  • WANG Bangfu ,
  • ZHOU Dongxiong ,
  • WU Jianlin
Expand
  • 1.Fujian Sanming Forest School,Sanming Fujian 365001,China;
    2.College of Resources and Environmental Science,Quanzhou Normal University,Quanzhou,Fujian 362000,China;
    3.Sanming Forestry Science and Technology Promotion Center,Sanming,Fujian 365000,China;
    4.Forestry Bureau of Sanyuan District Sanming,Fujian 365000,China)

Online published: 2020-11-20

摘要

对窄冠福建柏和福建柏的冠型结构、枝系特征和叶片形态特征进行分析,结果表明,在年龄和环境条件基本一致的情况下,二者对环境条件变化的适应策略不同:1)窄冠福建柏的冠长、冠幅和树冠率均小于福建柏,而树高和胸径则显著大于福建柏。2)福建柏各生长阶段的总体分枝率、逐步分枝率、一级枝长度、枝径比及枝倾角均大于窄冠福建柏。3)二者总体分枝率在幼苗、幼树阶段差异不显著,在成树阶段达到显著水平;逐步分枝率除幼苗和成树阶段SBR1:2差异显著,其它生长阶段的逐步分枝率差异都不显著;一级枝长度、枝径比及枝倾角差异均达到极显著水平。4)从叶片特征看,二者叶片长度在幼苗阶段差异显著,叶片宽度和长宽比在幼树、成树阶段差异显著,叶面积在各生长阶段差异均达到显著水平。

本文引用格式

黄云鹏 , 范繁荣 , 苏松锦 , 王邦富 , 周东雄 , 吴建林 . 窄冠福建柏与福建柏不同生长阶段构型差异分析[J]. 林草资源研究, 2015 , 0(5) : 67 -69 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2015.05.012

Abstract

The crown structure,branching characteristics and leaf characteristics of Fokienia hodginsii and its variant types at different growth stages were studied in this paper.The results showed that their adaptation strategy to the environmental conditions was different.The crown length,crown width and crown ratio of F.hodginsii variant types were all smaller than F.hodginsii;while the tree height and diameter at breast height were all significantly larger than F.hodginsii.The overall bifurcation ratio,stepwise bifurcation ratio,length of the first order branch,ratio of branch diameter and leaf angle to horizon of F.hodginsii were all larger than its variant types.As for the F.hodginsii and its variant types,the difference of overall bifurcation ratio was non-significant at the seedling stage and sapling stage,and significant at thetree spanning stage;the difference of stepwise bifurcation ratio SBR2:1 was significant at the seedling stage and tree spanning stage,and the stepwise bifurcation ratio of other growth stage were non-significant;the difference of length of the first order branch,ratio of branch diameter and leaf angle to horizon were all significant at the seedling stage,sapling stage and tree spanning stage.The leaf length of the F.hodginsii and its variant types was significantly different at the seedling stage;the leaf width and leaf length to width ratio of the F.hodginsii and its variant types were significantly different at the sapling stage and spanning tree stage;and the leaf area was significantly different at the seedling stage,sapling stage and tree spanning stage.

参考文献

[1]胡晓静,张文辉,何景峰,等.不同生境栓皮栎天然更新幼苗植冠构型分析[J].生态学报,2015,35(3):788-795.
[2]Borchert B,Slade N A.Bifuration ratios and the adaptive geometry of trees [J].BotGaz,1981,142:394-401.
[3]林勇明,洪滔,吴承祯,等.不同起源与方位下桂花的构型差异[J].福建林学院学报,2009,29(2):97-102.
[4]Oliver C D,Larson B C.Forest Stand Dynamics [M].New York:Mc-Graw-Hil,Inc,1990:41-88.
[5]李兆丰,周东雄,安平.福建柏变异类型的核型研究[J].林业科学,1995,31(3):215-219.
[6]黄云鹏,范繁荣,周东雄.窄冠福建柏人工林生长过程分析[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(4):12-16.
[7]胡喜生,洪伟,吴承祯,等.不同光环境下木荷幼苗树冠结构的可塑性响应[J].植物资源与环境学报,2006,15(2):55-59.
[8]王希群,马履一,张永福.北京地区油松、侧柏人工林叶面积指数变化规律[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(12):1486-1489.
[9]许强,杨自辉,郭树江.梭梭不同生长阶段的枝系构型特征[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(4):50-54.
[10]李兆丰,周东雄,安平.福建柏变异类型的核型研究[J].林业科学,1995,31(3):215-219.
文章导航

/